Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1883–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wollan v. United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Managementgreen1 sentence2009See id. at 1398 . | 1 | 1 |
Klinger v. Kightlygreen1 sentence1993See, e.g., Klinger v. Kightly, 791 P.2d 868 (Utah 1990) (surveyor negligence); Myers v. McDonald, 635 P.2d 84 (Utah 1981) (wrongful death action where plaintiffs did not know of their ward’s death until after the statute of limitation had run); Christiansen v. Rees, 20 Utah 2d 199 , 436 P.2d 435 (1968) (medical malpractice); Merkley v. Beaslin, 778 P.2d 16 (Utah App.1989) (legal malpractice). 5 . | 1 | 1 |
Telonis v. Staleygreen2 sentences1987A single tax assessment when the mineral and surface estates of a mining claim are held in common is appropriate, Telonis v. Staley, 104 Utah 537, 541-42 , 144 P.2d 513, 515 (1943), especially since mining claims presumptively include both the surface and mineral estates, unless a severance has occurred. 1987A single tax assessment when the mineral and surface estates of a mining claim are held in common is appropriate, Telonis v. Staley, 104 Utah 537, 541-42 , 144 P.2d 513, 515 (1943), especially since mining claims presumptively include both the surface and mineral estates, unless a severance has occurred. | 1 | 1 |
Mammoth Mining Co. v. Juab Countygreen2 sentences1987Mammoth Mining Co. v. Juab County, 10 Utah 232, 236 , 37 P. 348, 348 (1894). 1987Mammoth Mining Co. v. Juab County, 10 Utah 232, 236 , 37 P. 348, 348 (1894). | 1 | 1 |
Utah Copper Co. v. Chandlergreen2 sentences1987Utah Copper Co. v. Eckman, 47 Utah 165, 171 , 152 P. 178, 180 (1915); Utah Copper Co. v. Chandler, 45 Utah 85, 87 , 142 P. 1119, 1120 (1914). 1987Utah Copper Co. v. Eckman, 47 Utah 165, 171 , 152 P. 178, 180 (1915); Utah Copper Co. v. Chandler, 45 Utah 85, 87 , 142 P. 1119, 1120 (1914). | 1 | 1 |
Utah Copper Co. v. Eckmangreen2 sentences1987Utah Copper Co. v. Eckman, 47 Utah 165, 171 , 152 P. 178, 180 (1915); Utah Copper Co. v. Chandler, 45 Utah 85, 87 , 142 P. 1119, 1120 (1914). 1987Utah Copper Co. v. Eckman, 47 Utah 165, 171 , 152 P. 178, 180 (1915); Utah Copper Co. v. Chandler, 45 Utah 85, 87 , 142 P. 1119, 1120 (1914). | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Robygreen2 sentences1982Jackson v. Roby, 109 U.S. 440, 444 , 3 S.Ct. 301, 303 , 27 L.Ed. 990, 992 (1883), also addressed the nature of the annual labor requirement “where work or expenditure in one of several claims held in common is allowed, in place of the required expenditure on the claims separately.” In such circumstances, the Supreme Court stated, “the work or expenditure must be for the purpose of developing all the claims. 1982Jackson v. Roby, 109 U.S. 440, 444 , 3 S.Ct. 301, 303 , 27 L.Ed. 990, 992 (1883), also addressed the nature of the annual labor requirement “where work or expenditure in one of several claims held in common is allowed, in place of the required expenditure on the claims separately.” In such circumstances, the Supreme Court stated, “the work or expenditure must be for the purpose of developing all the claims. | 1 | 1 |
Smelting Co. v. Kempgreen2 sentences1982The Supreme Court of the United States described the nature of the assessment requirement in Smelting Co. v. Kemp, 104 U.S. 636, 655 , 26 L.Ed. 875, 882 (1881), as follows: Labor and improvements, within the meaning of the statute, are deemed to have been had on a mining claim, whether it consists of one location or several, when the labor is performed or the improvements are made for its development; that is, to facilitate the extraction of the metals it may contain; though in fact such labor and improvements may be on ground which originally constituted only one of the locations, . .. 1982The Supreme Court of the United States described the nature of the assessment requirement in Smelting Co. v. Kemp, 104 U.S. 636, 655 , 26 L.Ed. 875, 882 (1881), as follows: Labor and improvements, within the meaning of the statute, are deemed to have been had on a mining claim, whether it consists of one location or several, when the labor is performed or the improvements are made for its development; that is, to facilitate the extraction of the metals it may contain; though in fact such labor and improvements may be on ground which originally constituted only one of the locations, . .. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rice v. Granite School District
green
2 sentences1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or 1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or | 2 | 1981–1983 |
Vincent v. Salt Lake County
green
2 sentences1983E.g., Vincent v. Salt Lake County, Utah, 583 P.2d 105 (1978); Rice v. Granite School District, 23 Utah 2d 22 , 456 P.2d 159 (1969). 11 . 1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or | 2 | 1981–1983 |
Christiansen v. Rees
green
2 sentences1993See, e.g., Klinger v. Kightly, 791 P.2d 868 (Utah 1990) (surveyor negligence); Myers v. McDonald, 635 P.2d 84 (Utah 1981) (wrongful death action where plaintiffs did not know of their ward’s death until after the statute of limitation had run); Christiansen v. Rees, 20 Utah 2d 199 , 436 P.2d 435 (1968) (medical malpractice); Merkley v. Beaslin, 778 P.2d 16 (Utah App.1989) (legal malpractice). 5 . 1993See, e.g., Klinger v. Kightly, 791 P.2d 868 (Utah 1990) (surveyor negligence); Myers v. McDonald, 635 P.2d 84 (Utah 1981) (wrongful death action where plaintiffs did not know of their ward’s death until after the statute of limitation had run); Christiansen v. Rees, 20 Utah 2d 199 , 436 P.2d 435 (1968) (medical malpractice); Merkley v. Beaslin, 778 P.2d 16 (Utah App.1989) (legal malpractice). 5 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Myers v. McDonald
green
1 sentence1993See, e.g., Klinger v. Kightly, 791 P.2d 868 (Utah 1990) (surveyor negligence); Myers v. McDonald, 635 P.2d 84 (Utah 1981) (wrongful death action where plaintiffs did not know of their ward’s death until after the statute of limitation had run); Christiansen v. Rees, 20 Utah 2d 199 , 436 P.2d 435 (1968) (medical malpractice); Merkley v. Beaslin, 778 P.2d 16 (Utah App.1989) (legal malpractice). 5 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Merkley v. Beaslin
green
1 sentence1993See, e.g., Klinger v. Kightly, 791 P.2d 868 (Utah 1990) (surveyor negligence); Myers v. McDonald, 635 P.2d 84 (Utah 1981) (wrongful death action where plaintiffs did not know of their ward’s death until after the statute of limitation had run); Christiansen v. Rees, 20 Utah 2d 199 , 436 P.2d 435 (1968) (medical malpractice); Merkley v. Beaslin, 778 P.2d 16 (Utah App.1989) (legal malpractice). 5 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Foil v. Ballinger
green
2 sentences1981U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or directors); § 78-14-4 (health care malpractice), interpreted in Foil v. Ballinger, Utah, 601 P.2d 144 (1979). . 1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Family Savings and Loan, Inc. v. Ciccarello
green
2 sentences1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or 1981Va. 983 , 207 S.E.2d 157 (1974) (legal malpractice). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Thompson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
green
2 sentences1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or 1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
green
2 sentences1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or 1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Mumford v. Staton, Whaley & Price
green
2 sentences1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or 1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Denzer v. Rouse
green
2 sentences1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or 1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Peteler v. Robinson
green
2 sentences1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or 1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Med-Mar, Inc. v. DILWORTH
green
2 sentences1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or 1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Hart v. Hart
green
1 sentence1981App. 1970) (breach of contract); Denzer v. Rouse, 48 Wis.2d 528 , 180 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (legal malpractice). [4] Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 39 Cal. App.3d 315 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 171 (1974) (wrongful death); Peteler v. Robison, 81 Utah 535 , 17 P.2d 244 (1932) (medical malpractice prior to passage of § 78-14-4). [5] U.C.A., 1953, § 78-12-19 (recovery of any estate sold by an executor or administrator); § 78-12-26(1) (waste or trespass by underground works on a mining claim); § 78-12-26(2) (loss of branded livestock); § 78-12-26(3) (fraud); § 78-12-27 (actions against corporate stockholders or | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Moyle v. Bullene
neutral
1 sentence1959No rights are acquired by an entry within the surface lines of patented lands, or other lands which are -withdrawn from the body of the public domain.” Moyle v. Bullene, 7 Colo.App. 308 , 44 P. 69 ; Brewster v. Shoemaker, 28 Colo. 176 , 63 P. 309 , 310, S3 L.R.A. 793; Kirk v. Meldrum, 28 Colo. 453 , 65 P. 633 . 2 The same principle is stated in Morrison’s Mining Rights. 3 The Supreme Court of the State of Utah has long recognized the principle that the point of discovery must be located upon open public land. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co.
green
2 sentences1959In Clark-Montana Realty Co. v. Butte & Superior Copper Co., D.C., 233 F. 547, 555 , affirmed 249 U.S. 12 , 39 S.Ct. 231 , 63 L.Ed. 447 , it is said: “A location and its record are different things. 1959In Clark-Montana Realty Co. v. Butte & Superior Copper Co., D.C., 233 F. 547, 555 , affirmed 249 U.S. 12 , 39 S.Ct. 231 , 63 L.Ed. 447 , it is said: “A location and its record are different things. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Johnson v. Ryan
green
2 sentences1959Other cases holding that the right to a mining claim will not be forfeited by a failure to record a notice of location, in the absence of a state statute expressly providing for a forfeiture on that ground are Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co., C.C., 11 F. 666 ; Dripps v. Allison’s Mines Co., 45 Cal.App. 95 , 187 P. 448 ; Indiana Nevada Mining Co. v. Gold Hills Min. & Mill Co., 35 Nev. 158 , 126 P. 965 ; Johnson v. Ryan, 43 N.M. 127 , 86 P.2d 1040 . 1959Other cases holding that the right to a mining claim will not be forfeited by a failure to record a notice of location, in the absence of a state statute expressly providing for a forfeiture on that ground are Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co., C.C., 11 F. 666 ; Dripps v. Allison’s Mines Co., 45 Cal.App. 95 , 187 P. 448 ; Indiana Nevada Mining Co. v. Gold Hills Min. & Mill Co., 35 Nev. 158 , 126 P. 965 ; Johnson v. Ryan, 43 N.M. 127 , 86 P.2d 1040 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Clark-Montana Realty Co. v. Butte & Superior Copper Co.
green
1 sentence1959In Clark-Montana Realty Co. v. Butte & Superior Copper Co., D.C., 233 F. 547, 555 , affirmed 249 U.S. 12 , 39 S.Ct. 231 , 63 L.Ed. 447 , it is said: “A location and its record are different things. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
| Brewster v. Shoemaker neutral | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Kirk v. Meldrum
neutral
1 sentence1959No rights are acquired by an entry within the surface lines of patented lands, or other lands which are -withdrawn from the body of the public domain.” Moyle v. Bullene, 7 Colo.App. 308 , 44 P. 69 ; Brewster v. Shoemaker, 28 Colo. 176 , 63 P. 309 , 310, S3 L.R.A. 793; Kirk v. Meldrum, 28 Colo. 453 , 65 P. 633 . 2 The same principle is stated in Morrison’s Mining Rights. 3 The Supreme Court of the State of Utah has long recognized the principle that the point of discovery must be located upon open public land. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Indiana Nevada Mining Co. v. Gold Hills Mining & Milling Co.
neutral
1 sentence1959Other cases holding that the right to a mining claim will not be forfeited by a failure to record a notice of location, in the absence of a state statute expressly providing for a forfeiture on that ground are Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co., C.C., 11 F. 666 ; Dripps v. Allison’s Mines Co., 45 Cal.App. 95 , 187 P. 448 ; Indiana Nevada Mining Co. v. Gold Hills Min. & Mill Co., 35 Nev. 158 , 126 P. 965 ; Johnson v. Ryan, 43 N.M. 127 , 86 P.2d 1040 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Dripps v. the Allison's Mines Co.
green
2 sentences1959Other cases holding that the right to a mining claim will not be forfeited by a failure to record a notice of location, in the absence of a state statute expressly providing for a forfeiture on that ground are Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co., C.C., 11 F. 666 ; Dripps v. Allison’s Mines Co., 45 Cal.App. 95 , 187 P. 448 ; Indiana Nevada Mining Co. v. Gold Hills Min. & Mill Co., 35 Nev. 158 , 126 P. 965 ; Johnson v. Ryan, 43 N.M. 127 , 86 P.2d 1040 . 1959Other cases holding that the right to a mining claim will not be forfeited by a failure to record a notice of location, in the absence of a state statute expressly providing for a forfeiture on that ground are Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co., C.C., 11 F. 666 ; Dripps v. Allison’s Mines Co., 45 Cal.App. 95 , 187 P. 448 ; Indiana Nevada Mining Co. v. Gold Hills Min. & Mill Co., 35 Nev. 158 , 126 P. 965 ; Johnson v. Ryan, 43 N.M. 127 , 86 P.2d 1040 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.
green
1 sentence1959Other cases holding that the right to a mining claim will not be forfeited by a failure to record a notice of location, in the absence of a state statute expressly providing for a forfeiture on that ground are Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co., C.C., 11 F. 666 ; Dripps v. Allison’s Mines Co., 45 Cal.App. 95 , 187 P. 448 ; Indiana Nevada Mining Co. v. Gold Hills Min. & Mill Co., 35 Nev. 158 , 126 P. 965 ; Johnson v. Ryan, 43 N.M. 127 , 86 P.2d 1040 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
| Stevens v. Grand Central Min. Co. neutral | 1 | 1957–1957 |
| Royston v. Miller neutral | 1 | 1953–1953 |
| West Coast Power Co. v. Buttram neutral | 1 | 1943–1943 |
| Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. Salt Lake Investment Co. green | 1 | 1940–1940 |
| Miehlich v. Tintic Standard Mining Co. neutral | 1 | 1929–1929 |
| Patterson v. Hewitt green | 1 | 1920–1920 |
| Fredricks v. Klauser neutral | 1 | 1912–1912 |
| Dayton Gold & Silver Mining Co. v. Seawell green | 1 | 1904–1904 |
| Belk v. Meagher green | 1 | 1903–1903 |
| Erhardt v. Boaro green | 1 | 1901–1901 |
| Crescent Mining Co. v. Silver King Mining Co. neutral | 1 | 1900–1900 |
| Salmon v. Wilson green | 1 | 1883–1883 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.