128 Texas opinions name it 4 courts 1916–2024 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rachal v. Stategreen2 sentences2024Rachal v. State, 917 S.W.2d 799, 809 (Tex. Crim. 2021Rachal v. State, 917 S.W.2d 799, 809 (Tex. Crim. | 14 | 14 |
In Re Guardianship of Berrygreen2 sentences2024See Sink v. Sink, 364 S.W.3d 340, 347 (Tex. App.— Dallas 2012, no pet.) (“A trial court’s order pertaining to health insurance for the children will not be reversed on appeal unless the complaining party can show a clear abuse of discretion.”); In the Int. of A.C.J., 146 S.W.3d 323, 327 (Tex. App.— Beaumont 2004, no pet.) (“We will not reverse a trial court’s judgment on attorney’s fees in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion.”); In re the Guardianship of Berry, 105 S.W.3d 665, 667 (Tex. App.— Beaumont 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“Where no 2008See In re Berry, 105 S.W.3d at 667 . | 3 | 3 |
Villegas v. Cartergreen2 sentences2018See Villegas, 711 S.W.2d at 626 ; Ruiz, 2014 WL 4458952 , at *3; Qurashi, 2013 WL 2644182 , at *3. 3 Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Niranjan’s motion for continuance. 2005See id. ; Crank, 666 S.W.2d at 94 ; see also Tex. R. | 3 | 3 |
Quinn v. Stategreen2 sentences2002See Quinn v. State, 958 S.W.2d 395, 402 (Tex.Crim.App.1997). 2000Quinn v. State , 958 S.W.2d 395, 402 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
Hardesty v. Stategreen2 sentences1995Hardesty v. State, 667 S.W.2d 130, 133, n. 6 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (Generally this Court would look only to the evidence adduced at the hearing because the trial judge did not have the benefit of the testimony from trial when making his ruling. 1991The evidence adduced at the hearing on the motions, the only evidence considered, Hardesty v. State, 667 S.W.2d 130 , 133 n. 6 (Tex.Cr.App.1984), negates an abuse of discretion because it supports the court’s findings, thereby requiring that they be upheld. | 2 | 7 |
Bryan v. Resolution Trust Corp.green2 sentences2015See Bryan, 823 S.W.2d at 434-35 (court authorized to enter modified judgment to correctly reflect approved final judgment of parties); see also Lawrence v. Kohl, 853 S.W.2d 697, 701 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, no writ) (unpublished part of opinion available on Westlaw) (“[T]he court has no power to supply terms, provisions, or essential details not previously agreed to by the parties.” (citing Dodson v. Seymour, 664 S.W.2d 158, 161 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1983, no writ)). 2015See Bryan, 823 S.W.2d at 434–35 (court authorized to enter modified judgment to 1 AAS’s brief designates some of its responsive contentions as “cross points,” but it does not seek relief that would alter the trial court’s judgment. | 2 | 2 |
Robinson v. Robinsongreen2 sentences2015Rogers v. Rogers, 561 S.W.2d 172 , 173– 74 (Tex. 1978); Robinson v. Robinson, 487 S.W.2d 713, 715 (Tex. 1972). 1979Robinson v. Robinson, 487 S.W.2d 713, 715 (Tex.1972); Rogers v. Rogers, 561 S.W.2d 172, 173-4 (Tex.1978); Morgan Express, Inc. v. Elizabeth-Perkins, Inc., 525 S.W.2d 312, 314 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1975, writ ref’d). | 2 | 2 |
In Re the Marriage of Spiegelgreen2 sentences2003See Interest of L.C.H., 80 S.W.3d 689, 691 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2002, no pet.) ("Where a reporter's record is not requested, the trial court's findings of fact are conclusive, and we presume that sufficient evidence was introduced to support the findings and the judgment based on them."); In re Marriage of Spiegel, 6 S.W.3d 643, 646 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1999, no pet.)("Simply put, if the reporter's record is absent because the appellant did not satisfy [Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure] rule 35.3(b), we will not only continue to presume that the missing record supports the trial court's det 2003See Interest of L.C.H., 80 S.W.3d 689, 691 (Tex.App.Fort Worth 2002, no pet.) (“Where a reporter’s record is not requested, the trial court’s findings of fact are conclusive, and we presume that sufficient evidence was introduced to support the findings and the judgment based on them.”); In re Marriage of Spiegel, 6 S.W.3d 643, 646 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1999, no pet.)(“Simply put, if the reporter’s record is absent because the appellant did not satisfy [Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure] rule 35.3(b), we will not only continue to presume that the missing record supports the trial court’s determin | 2 | 2 |
In the Interest of L.C.H.green2 sentences2003See Interest of L.C.H., 80 S.W.3d 689, 691 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2002, no pet.) ("Where a reporter's record is not requested, the trial court's findings of fact are conclusive, and we presume that sufficient evidence was introduced to support the findings and the judgment based on them."); In re Marriage of Spiegel, 6 S.W.3d 643, 646 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1999, no pet.)("Simply put, if the reporter's record is absent because the appellant did not satisfy [Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure] rule 35.3(b), we will not only continue to presume that the missing record supports the trial court's det 2003See Interest of L.C.H., 80 S.W.3d 689, 691 (Tex.App.Fort Worth 2002, no pet.) (“Where a reporter’s record is not requested, the trial court’s findings of fact are conclusive, and we presume that sufficient evidence was introduced to support the findings and the judgment based on them.”); In re Marriage of Spiegel, 6 S.W.3d 643, 646 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1999, no pet.)(“Simply put, if the reporter’s record is absent because the appellant did not satisfy [Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure] rule 35.3(b), we will not only continue to presume that the missing record supports the trial court’s determin | 2 | 2 |
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences1998Jones v. State, 589 S.W.2d 419, 421 (Tex.Crim.App.1979). 1990Jones v. State , 589 S.W.2d 419, 421 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Rogers v. Rogersgreen2 sentences2015Rogers v. Rogers, 561 S.W.2d 172 , 173– 74 (Tex. 1978); Robinson v. Robinson, 487 S.W.2d 713, 715 (Tex. 1972). 1979Robinson v. Robinson, 487 S.W.2d 713, 715 (Tex.1972); Rogers v. Rogers, 561 S.W.2d 172, 173-4 (Tex.1978); Morgan Express, Inc. v. Elizabeth-Perkins, Inc., 525 S.W.2d 312, 314 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1975, writ ref’d). | 1 | 2 |
Dang v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Rachal v. State, 917 S.W.2d 799, 809 (Tex.Crim.App.1996); Dang v. State, 99 S.W.3d 172, 179 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, no pet.). 2003Rachal v. State, 917 S.W.2d 799, 809 (Tex.Crim.App.1996); Dang, 99 S.W.3d at 179 . | 1 | 2 |
Green v. Stategreen2 sentences1991Green v. State, 615 S.W.2d at 707 . 1983See also Green v. State, 615 S.W.2d 700, 707 (Tex.Cr.App.1980). | 1 | 2 |
Englander Co. v. Kennedygreen2 sentences1979“When the complaint is that the evidence is factually or legally insufficient to support vital findings of fact, or that the evidence conclusively refutes vital findings, this burden cannot be discharged in the absence of a complete or an agreed statement of facts.” Englander Co. v. Kennedy, 428 S.W.2d 806, 807 (Tex.Sup.1968). 1972Englander Co. Inc., v. Kennedy, Tex., 428 S.W.2d 806 ; Ehrhardt v. Ehrhardt, Tex.Civ.App., Err.Ref., 368 S.W.2d 37 ; Guthrie v. National Homes Corp., Tex., 394 S.W.2d 494 ; Empire Life and Hospital Ins. | 1 | 2 |
Sink v. Sinkgreen1 sentence2024See Sink v. Sink, 364 S.W.3d 340, 347 (Tex. App.— Dallas 2012, no pet.) (“A trial court’s order pertaining to health insurance for the children will not be reversed on appeal unless the complaining party can show a clear abuse of discretion.”); In the Int. of A.C.J., 146 S.W.3d 323, 327 (Tex. App.— Beaumont 2004, no pet.) (“We will not reverse a trial court’s judgment on attorney’s fees in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion.”); In re the Guardianship of Berry, 105 S.W.3d 665, 667 (Tex. App.— Beaumont 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“Where no | 1 | 1 |
In Re ACJgreen1 sentence2024See Sink v. Sink, 364 S.W.3d 340, 347 (Tex. App.— Dallas 2012, no pet.) (“A trial court’s order pertaining to health insurance for the children will not be reversed on appeal unless the complaining party can show a clear abuse of discretion.”); In the Int. of A.C.J., 146 S.W.3d 323, 327 (Tex. App.— Beaumont 2004, no pet.) (“We will not reverse a trial court’s judgment on attorney’s fees in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion.”); In re the Guardianship of Berry, 105 S.W.3d 665, 667 (Tex. App.— Beaumont 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“Where no | 1 | 1 |
State v. Connie Torrezgreen1 sentence2024See Torrez, 490 S.W.3d at 283 . | 1 | 1 |
Noell v. Air Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.green1 sentence2023See Noell, 246 S.W.3d at 834–36. | 1 | 1 |
GREENVILLE SURGERY CENTER, LTD. v. Beebegreen1 sentence2020Code Ann. § 15.50 (b)(2); see Greenville Surgery Ctr., Ltd. v. Beebe, 320 S.W.3d 850, 853 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.) (concluding physicians’ covenants not to compete were unenforceable because they did not contain a buyout clause). | 1 | 1 |
| In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P.green | 1 | 1 |
| Tucker, Thomas Paulgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Dodson v. Seymourgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Lawrence v. Kohlgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Walker v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Servicesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Lopez v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Arvizugreen | 1 | 1 |
| Oursbourn v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Herndongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Wood v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Rickels v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| B.C. v. Rhodes Ex Rel. T.L.R.green | 1 | 1 |
| Amador v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Salazar v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Mason v. Our Lady Star of the Sea Catholic Churchgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re CHgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Kernahan v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Bullock v. Hewlett-Packard Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| McCarty v. Texas Parks & Wildlife Departmentgreen | 1 | 1 |
| DeLeon v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Flowers v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gerst v. Nixon
green
2 sentences1978Section 2.08 of the Act provides “that the Commissioner shall not approve any charter application unless he shall have affirmatively found from the data furnished with the application, the evidence adduced at such hearing, and his official records that:” (1) the prerequisites, where applicable, set forth in Sections 2.02, 2.03, 2.04, 2.05, and 2.06 have been complied with and that the Articles of incorporation comply with all other provisions of this Act; (2) the character, responsibility and general fitness of the persons named in the Articles of incorporation are such as to command confidenc 1970For definition of “public need” see Gerst v. Nixon, 411 S.W.2d 350 , Tex.Sup. (1967). . | 3 | 1967–1978 |
State v. Moore
green
2 sentences2010Moore, 225 S.W.3d at 570 . 2009Moore , 225 S.W.3d at 570 . | 2 | 2009–2010 |
Illinois v. Gates
green
2 sentences2007As to the contention the affidavit does not specifically show the basis of knowledge of the identity of Bass or the basis of the informant's knowledge that the premises were under Bass's control, the case of Illinois v. Gates , 462 U.S. 213 , negates the necessity of a showing of the basis of knowledge and adopts a totality of the circumstances review. 2002As to the contention the affidavit does not specifically show the basis of knowledge of the identity of Bass or the basis of the informant's knowledge that the premises were under Bass's control, the case of Illinois v. Gates , 462 U.S. 213 , negates the necessity of a showing of the basis of knowledge and adopts a totality of the circumstances review. | 2 | 2002–2007 |
Ex Parte Rowe v. State
green
2 sentences2006The record shows that Avila could not post bond in any amount; accordingly, the trial court should have released Avila on a personal recognizance bond. 1 See Rowe, 853 S.W.2d at 582 ; Ex parte Kernahan, 657 S.W.2d 438, 434-35 (Tex.Crim.App.1983); McNeil, 772 S.W.2d at 490 . 2006The record shows that Avila could not post bond in any amount; accordingly, the trial court should have released Avila on a personal recognizance bond. [1] See Rowe, 853 S.W.2d at 582 ; Ex parte Kernahan, 657 S.W.2d 433, 434-35 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Crank
green
2 sentences2005See id. ; Crank, 666 S.W.2d at 94 ; see also Tex. R. 2005See id. ; Crank, 666 S.W.2d at 94 ; see also Tex. R. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Ellender
green
2 sentences2004As directed by the supreme court, the trial court credited each appellee “with the amount reflecting the benefit he or she received from the settlement proceeds.” Utts I, 81 S.W.3d at 830 (citing Ellender, 968 S.W.2d at 927 ) (emphasis added). 2004As directed by the supreme court, the trial court credited each appellee "with the amount reflecting the benefit he or she received from the settlement proceeds." Utts I , 81 S.W.3d at 830 (citing Ellender , 968 S.W.2d at 927 ) (emphasis added). | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Geyer v. Jones
green
2 sentences1981Vestal v. Jackson, 598 S.W.2d 724 (Tex.Civ.App.-Waco 1980, no writ); Rancho Camille, S. A. v. Beachum, 596 S.W.2d 632 (Tex.Civ.App.-Waco 1980, no writ); Geyer v. Jones, 93 S.W.2d 1192 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1936, writ dism’d). 1980Gooch v. Sandboe (Galveston CA 1934) 69 S.W.2d 215 , error dismissed; Geyer v. Jones (San Antonio CA 1936) 93 S.W.2d 1192 , error dismissed. | 2 | 1980–1981 |
Ex Parte Kollenborn
green
2 sentences1977Ex parte Kollenborn, 154 Tex. 223 , 276 S.W.2d 251 (1955). *850 The relator testified that since the date on which the child support payments were set both he and his wife had lost their jobs. 1977Ex parte Kollenborn, 154 Tex. 223 , 276 S.W.2d 251 (1955). *850 The relator testified that since the date on which the child support payments were set both he and his wife had lost their jobs. | 2 | 1967–1977 |
O'DELL v. State
green
2 sentences1974“The record reflects that after the verdict of guilty was returned by the jury, appellant pleaded ‘True’ to the enhancement paragraph of the indictment which states said offense to be ‘one of like character . . . ’ “In O’Dell v. State, 467 S.W.2d 444 , we held that the plea of ‘True’ was sufficient to show the prior conviction. 1973The record reflects that after the verdict of guilty was returned by the jury, appellant pleaded “True” to the enhancement paragraph of the indictment which states said offense to be “one of like character In O’Dell v. State, 467 S.W.2d 444 , we held that the plea of “True” was sufficient to show the prior conviction. | 2 | 1973–1974 |
Graves v. First National Bank of Bonham
neutral
2 sentences1926Graves v. Bank, 77 Texas 555, 556 , 14 S. W., 163 ; Robinson v. Chamberlain, 29 Texas Civ. 1926Graves v. Bank, 77 Texas 555, 556 , 14 S. W., 163 ; Robinson v. Chamberlain, 29 Texas Civ. | 2 | 1922–1926 |
Heiselbetz v. State
green
1 sentence2022However, a “trial court may deny bail and commit the defendant to custody if there then exists good cause to believe that the defendant would not appear when his conviction became final or is likely to commit another offense while on bail.” Id. art. 44.04(c). 4 While we are sympathetic to Diaz’s serious health issues, the evidence adduced at the hearing showed that Diaz had knowingly violated the sex offender registration requirements for a period of at least three years before his arrest—he admitted as much by pleading guilty to the offense. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
| Jackson v. State green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| Cantu v. State green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Freeman v. State green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Moore v. State green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| Cochran v. State green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| Cantu v. State green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| Director, State Employees Workers' Compensation Division v. Evans green | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| Ortiz v. State green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| Ex Parte McNeil green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| Utts v. Short green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Williams v. State green | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| Credit Bureau Services-New Orleans v. Hyde green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Boothe v. Hausler green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Oliver v. State green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Helms v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage, Commission green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Rector v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| McMahon v. State green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Writt v. State green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| O'BRYAN v. State green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Darrington v. State green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Green v. State green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Kindell v. State green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.