Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pinkney v. Stategreen2 sentences2019Buckley v. State, 797 N.E.2d 845, 849 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003) (citing Pinkney v. State, 742 N.E.2d 956, 959 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001), trans. denied). 2006Buckley v. State, 797 N.E.2d 845, 849 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (citing Pinkney v. State, 742 N.E.2d 956, 959 (Ind.Ct.App.2001), trans. denied). *651 When seeking to rely upon consent to justify a warrantless search, the State has the burden of proving that the consent was freely and voluntarily given. | 4 | 4 |
Buckley v. Stategreen2 sentences2019Buckley v. State, 797 N.E.2d 845, 849 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003) (citing Pinkney v. State, 742 N.E.2d 956, 959 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001), trans. denied). 2017Buckley v. State, 797 N.E.2d 845, 849 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). | 3 | 3 |
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences2000See Jones v. State, 655 N.E.2d 49, 54 (Ind.1995), reh’g. denied. 1999See Jones v. State, 655 N.E.2d 49, 54 (Ind.1995). | 3 | 3 |
Ammons v. Stategreen2 sentences2012“The theory underlying this exception is that, when an individual gives the State permission to search either his person or property, the governmental intrusion is presumably reasonable.” Id. 2012“The theory underlying this exception is that, when an individual gives the State permission to search either his person or property, the governmental intrusion is presumably reasonable.” Id. | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
California v. Carney
green
2 sentences2024“The theory underlying the exception for vehicles is that the vehicle is ‘being used for transportation.’” Id. at 1286 (quoting Carney, 471 U.S. at 394 , 105 S. Ct. 2066 ). 2024“The theory underlying the exception for vehicles is that the vehicle is ‘being used for transportation.’” Id. at 1286 (quoting Carney, 471 U.S. at 394 , 105 S. Ct. 2066 ). | 3 | 2010–2024 |
Melton v. State
green
2 sentences2001Melton, 705 N.E.2d at 566 . 1999Melton, 705 N.E.2d at 566 . | 2 | 1999–2001 |
State v. Hobbs
green
1 sentence2018Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02-1711-PC-2804 | October 30, 2018 Page 12 of 24 [21] In State v. Hobbs, the case cited by the State in support of admitting the evidence, officers positioned themselves across from a restaurant where officers were aware the defendant, who was wanted on an outstanding felony arrest warrant, was employed. 933 N.E.2d at 1284 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Navarro v. State
green
1 sentence2014Navarro, 855 N.E.2d at 675 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Callahan v. State
green
1 sentence2006Id. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Mitchell v. State
green
1 sentence2002Id. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.