18 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1897–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thomasgreen2 sentences2019See State v. Thomas , 275 Ga. 167 , 167-168, 562 S.E.2d 501 (2002) (concluding that trial court's finding that prosecutor intentionally provoked a mistrial was supported by evidence that the prosecutor had been a member of the bar for nine years and tried numerous felony cases, and that the prosecutor stood to gain by aborting the trial due to testimony favorable to the defense). 2019See State v. Thomas , 275 Ga. 167 , 167-168, 562 S.E.2d 501 (2002) (concluding that trial court's finding that prosecutor intentionally provoked a mistrial was supported by evidence that the prosecutor had been a member of the bar for nine years and tried numerous felony cases, and that the prosecutor stood to gain by aborting the trial due to testimony favorable to the defense). | 2 | 2 |
In Re KSLgreen2 sentences1999S. L., supra at 52 (2). 1999While D.K.M.'s claim of providing money and food to the poor is praiseworthy, it does not "demand a finding that he has been sufficiently rehabilitated and currently possesses the moral character and fitness necessary to become a member of the bar." In re K.S.L., supra at 52(2), 495 S.E.2d 276 . | 1 | 2 |
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecumgreen2 sentences2025Jan. 3, 2011) (noting that “the reasonable belief exception is well established,” and that “[a] number of courts have sustained invocation of the privilege even when the communications were not made with a member of the bar, if the client reasonably believed that it was communicating with an attorney”); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F3d 910, 924 (8th Cir. 1997) (discussing approaches of other courts in applying the reasonable-belief standard where an attorney–client relationship did not exist, but where there were reasonable mistakes of fact by clients that the relationship did ex 2025Jan. 3, 2011) (noting that “the reasonable belief exception is well established,” and that “[a] number of courts have sustained invocation of the privilege even when the communications were not made with a member of the bar, if the client reasonably believed that it was communicating with an attorney”); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F3d 910, 924 (8th Cir. 1997) (discussing approaches of other courts in applying the reasonable-belief standard where an attorney–client relationship did not exist, but where there were reasonable mistakes of fact by clients that the relationship did ex | 1 | 1 |
In the Matter of Leighton Reid Berry, Jrgreen2 sentences2024But we need not answer these questions to resolve this matter. 7 various violations of GRPC, including in connection with settling client’s personal injury case and failing to pay medical providers funds they were entitled to, where there were substantial mitigating circumstances and where reinstatement was conditioned on participation in Law Practice Management Program); In the Matter of Veach, 310 Ga. 470, 471-473 (851 SE2d 590) (2020) (imposing an 18-month suspension where attorney with no prior disciplinary history filed petition for voluntary discipline, admitting violations of Rules 1.15 2024But we need not answer these questions to resolve this matter. 7 various violations of GRPC, including in connection with settling client’s personal injury case and failing to pay medical providers funds they were entitled to, where there were substantial mitigating circumstances and where reinstatement was conditioned on participation in Law Practice Management Program); In the Matter of Veach, 310 Ga. 470, 471-473 (851 SE2d 590) (2020) (imposing an 18-month suspension where attorney with no prior disciplinary history filed petition for voluntary discipline, admitting violations of Rules 1.15 | 1 | 1 |
In re Nicholsongreen2 sentences2024But we need not answer these questions to resolve this matter. 7 various violations of GRPC, including in connection with settling client’s personal injury case and failing to pay medical providers funds they were entitled to, where there were substantial mitigating circumstances and where reinstatement was conditioned on participation in Law Practice Management Program); In the Matter of Veach, 310 Ga. 470, 471-473 (851 SE2d 590) (2020) (imposing an 18-month suspension where attorney with no prior disciplinary history filed petition for voluntary discipline, admitting violations of Rules 1.15 2024But we need not answer these questions to resolve this matter. 7 various violations of GRPC, including in connection with settling client’s personal injury case and failing to pay medical providers funds they were entitled to, where there were substantial mitigating circumstances and where reinstatement was conditioned on participation in Law Practice Management Program); In the Matter of Veach, 310 Ga. 470, 471-473 (851 SE2d 590) (2020) (imposing an 18-month suspension where attorney with no prior disciplinary history filed petition for voluntary discipline, admitting violations of Rules 1.15 | 1 | 1 |
In the Matter of Anthony O. Van Johnsongreen2 sentences2024See, e.g., In the Matter of Van Johnson, 313 Ga. 151, 152-154 ( 868 SE2d 794 ) (2022) (imposing six-month suspension where attorney with no prior disciplinary history filed petition for voluntary discipline, admitting various violations of GRPC, including in connection with settling client’s personal injury case and failing to pay medical providers funds they were entitled to, where there were substantial mitigating (“Except as provided by Subsection (b), a person may not practice law in this state unless the person is a member of the state bar.”). 2024See, e.g., In the Matter of Van Johnson, 313 Ga. 151, 152-154 ( 868 SE2d 794 ) (2022) (imposing six-month suspension where attorney with no prior disciplinary history filed petition for voluntary discipline, admitting various violations of GRPC, including in connection with settling client’s personal injury case and failing to pay medical providers funds they were entitled to, where there were substantial mitigating (“Except as provided by Subsection (b), a person may not practice law in this state unless the person is a member of the state bar.”). | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Wittesgreen2 sentences1997See OCGA § 19-10-1. [6] University of Iowa Press v. Urrea, 211 Ga.App. 564 , 440 S.E.2d 203 (1993). [7] 266 Ga. 132 , 464 S.E.2d 816 (1996). [8] Id. at 133, n. 4 , 464 S.E.2d 816 . [9] See ABA Standard 9.32(h). [10] In the Matter of Wittes, 267 Ga. 52 , 472 S.E.2d 429 (1996); In the Matter of Bailey, 267 Ga. 370 , 478 S.E.2d 131 (1996). [11] See Nasco, Inc. v. Gimbert, 239 Ga. 675 , 238 S.E.2d 368 (1977); Ulman Woolen Co. v. Magill, 155 Ga. 555 , 117 S.E. 657 (1923). [12] Nonsupport is, of course, punishable by contempt in this state, as is any other violation of a court order. 1997See OCGA § 19-10-1. [6] University of Iowa Press v. Urrea, 211 Ga.App. 564 , 440 S.E.2d 203 (1993). [7] 266 Ga. 132 , 464 S.E.2d 816 (1996). [8] Id. at 133, n. 4 , 464 S.E.2d 816 . [9] See ABA Standard 9.32(h). [10] In the Matter of Wittes, 267 Ga. 52 , 472 S.E.2d 429 (1996); In the Matter of Bailey, 267 Ga. 370 , 478 S.E.2d 131 (1996). [11] See Nasco, Inc. v. Gimbert, 239 Ga. 675 , 238 S.E.2d 368 (1977); Ulman Woolen Co. v. Magill, 155 Ga. 555 , 117 S.E. 657 (1923). [12] Nonsupport is, of course, punishable by contempt in this state, as is any other violation of a court order. | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Williamsgreen2 sentences1997Rule 1-209 provides that when a court of competent jurisdiction makes a finding under the Code section that a member of the bar has wilfully failed to timely pay a child support obligation and such refusal continues for 30 days after the determination becomes final, the bar member "shall be deemed not to be in good standing and shall remain in such status until such time as the noncompliance is corrected." [4] In the Matter of David Wayne Williams, 266 Ga. 132, 133, n. 1, n. 4 , 464 S.E.2d 816 (1996). [5] Georgia has no crime of flagrant nonsupport, and the most comparable Georgia crime, aband 1997Rule 1-209 provides that when a court of competent jurisdiction makes a finding under the Code section that a member of the bar has wilfully failed to timely pay a child support obligation and such refusal continues for 30 days after the determination becomes final, the bar member "shall be deemed not to be in good standing and shall remain in such status until such time as the noncompliance is corrected." [4] In the Matter of David Wayne Williams, 266 Ga. 132, 133, n. 1, n. 4 , 464 S.E.2d 816 (1996). [5] Georgia has no crime of flagrant nonsupport, and the most comparable Georgia crime, aband | 1 | 1 |
University of Iowa Press v. Urreagreen2 sentences1997See OCGA § 19-10-1. [6] University of Iowa Press v. Urrea, 211 Ga.App. 564 , 440 S.E.2d 203 (1993). [7] 266 Ga. 132 , 464 S.E.2d 816 (1996). [8] Id. at 133, n. 4 , 464 S.E.2d 816 . [9] See ABA Standard 9.32(h). [10] In the Matter of Wittes, 267 Ga. 52 , 472 S.E.2d 429 (1996); In the Matter of Bailey, 267 Ga. 370 , 478 S.E.2d 131 (1996). [11] See Nasco, Inc. v. Gimbert, 239 Ga. 675 , 238 S.E.2d 368 (1977); Ulman Woolen Co. v. Magill, 155 Ga. 555 , 117 S.E. 657 (1923). [12] Nonsupport is, of course, punishable by contempt in this state, as is any other violation of a court order. 1997See OCGA § 19-10-1. [6] University of Iowa Press v. Urrea, 211 Ga.App. 564 , 440 S.E.2d 203 (1993). [7] 266 Ga. 132 , 464 S.E.2d 816 (1996). [8] Id. at 133, n. 4 , 464 S.E.2d 816 . [9] See ABA Standard 9.32(h). [10] In the Matter of Wittes, 267 Ga. 52 , 472 S.E.2d 429 (1996); In the Matter of Bailey, 267 Ga. 370 , 478 S.E.2d 131 (1996). [11] See Nasco, Inc. v. Gimbert, 239 Ga. 675 , 238 S.E.2d 368 (1977); Ulman Woolen Co. v. Magill, 155 Ga. 555 , 117 S.E. 657 (1923). [12] Nonsupport is, of course, punishable by contempt in this state, as is any other violation of a court order. | 1 | 1 |
Hart v. Stategreen2 sentences1972See also Hart v. State, 227 Ga. 171, 176 ( 179 SE2d 346 ) and Heard v. State, 126 Ga. App. 62 ( 189 SE2d 895 ). 3. 1972See also Hart v. State, 227 Ga. 171, 176 ( 179 SE2d 346 ) and Heard v. State, 126 Ga. App. 62 ( 189 SE2d 895 ). 3. | 1 | 1 |
Heard v. Stategreen2 sentences1972See also Hart v. State, 227 Ga. 171, 176 ( 179 SE2d 346 ) and Heard v. State, 126 Ga. App. 62 ( 189 SE2d 895 ). 3. 1972See also Hart v. State, 227 Ga. 171, 176 ( 179 SE2d 346 ) and Heard v. State, 126 Ga. App. 62 ( 189 SE2d 895 ). 3. | 1 | 1 |
Butler v. Cartergreen2 sentences1966See Scott v. Hall, supra, (2); Butler v. Carter, 198 Ga. 754, 758 (2) ( 32 SE2d 808 ). 1966See Scott v. Hall, supra, (2); Butler v. Carter, 198 Ga. 754, 758 (2) ( 32 SE2d 808 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Jennings v. Striplinggreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ulman, Magill & Jordan Woolen Co. v. Magill
green
2 sentences1997See OCGA § 19-10-1. [6] University of Iowa Press v. Urrea, 211 Ga.App. 564 , 440 S.E.2d 203 (1993). [7] 266 Ga. 132 , 464 S.E.2d 816 (1996). [8] Id. at 133, n. 4 , 464 S.E.2d 816 . [9] See ABA Standard 9.32(h). [10] In the Matter of Wittes, 267 Ga. 52 , 472 S.E.2d 429 (1996); In the Matter of Bailey, 267 Ga. 370 , 478 S.E.2d 131 (1996). [11] See Nasco, Inc. v. Gimbert, 239 Ga. 675 , 238 S.E.2d 368 (1977); Ulman Woolen Co. v. Magill, 155 Ga. 555 , 117 S.E. 657 (1923). [12] Nonsupport is, of course, punishable by contempt in this state, as is any other violation of a court order. 1997See OCGA § 19-10-1. [6] University of Iowa Press v. Urrea, 211 Ga.App. 564 , 440 S.E.2d 203 (1993). [7] 266 Ga. 132 , 464 S.E.2d 816 (1996). [8] Id. at 133, n. 4 , 464 S.E.2d 816 . [9] See ABA Standard 9.32(h). [10] In the Matter of Wittes, 267 Ga. 52 , 472 S.E.2d 429 (1996); In the Matter of Bailey, 267 Ga. 370 , 478 S.E.2d 131 (1996). [11] See Nasco, Inc. v. Gimbert, 239 Ga. 675 , 238 S.E.2d 368 (1977); Ulman Woolen Co. v. Magill, 155 Ga. 555 , 117 S.E. 657 (1923). [12] Nonsupport is, of course, punishable by contempt in this state, as is any other violation of a court order. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Nasco, Inc. v. Gimbert
green
2 sentences1997See OCGA § 19-10-1. [6] University of Iowa Press v. Urrea, 211 Ga.App. 564 , 440 S.E.2d 203 (1993). [7] 266 Ga. 132 , 464 S.E.2d 816 (1996). [8] Id. at 133, n. 4 , 464 S.E.2d 816 . [9] See ABA Standard 9.32(h). [10] In the Matter of Wittes, 267 Ga. 52 , 472 S.E.2d 429 (1996); In the Matter of Bailey, 267 Ga. 370 , 478 S.E.2d 131 (1996). [11] See Nasco, Inc. v. Gimbert, 239 Ga. 675 , 238 S.E.2d 368 (1977); Ulman Woolen Co. v. Magill, 155 Ga. 555 , 117 S.E. 657 (1923). [12] Nonsupport is, of course, punishable by contempt in this state, as is any other violation of a court order. 1997See OCGA § 19-10-1. [6] University of Iowa Press v. Urrea, 211 Ga.App. 564 , 440 S.E.2d 203 (1993). [7] 266 Ga. 132 , 464 S.E.2d 816 (1996). [8] Id. at 133, n. 4 , 464 S.E.2d 816 . [9] See ABA Standard 9.32(h). [10] In the Matter of Wittes, 267 Ga. 52 , 472 S.E.2d 429 (1996); In the Matter of Bailey, 267 Ga. 370 , 478 S.E.2d 131 (1996). [11] See Nasco, Inc. v. Gimbert, 239 Ga. 675 , 238 S.E.2d 368 (1977); Ulman Woolen Co. v. Magill, 155 Ga. 555 , 117 S.E. 657 (1923). [12] Nonsupport is, of course, punishable by contempt in this state, as is any other violation of a court order. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Matter of Bailey
green
2 sentences1997See OCGA § 19-10-1. [6] University of Iowa Press v. Urrea, 211 Ga.App. 564 , 440 S.E.2d 203 (1993). [7] 266 Ga. 132 , 464 S.E.2d 816 (1996). [8] Id. at 133, n. 4 , 464 S.E.2d 816 . [9] See ABA Standard 9.32(h). [10] In the Matter of Wittes, 267 Ga. 52 , 472 S.E.2d 429 (1996); In the Matter of Bailey, 267 Ga. 370 , 478 S.E.2d 131 (1996). [11] See Nasco, Inc. v. Gimbert, 239 Ga. 675 , 238 S.E.2d 368 (1977); Ulman Woolen Co. v. Magill, 155 Ga. 555 , 117 S.E. 657 (1923). [12] Nonsupport is, of course, punishable by contempt in this state, as is any other violation of a court order. 1997See OCGA § 19-10-1. [6] University of Iowa Press v. Urrea, 211 Ga.App. 564 , 440 S.E.2d 203 (1993). [7] 266 Ga. 132 , 464 S.E.2d 816 (1996). [8] Id. at 133, n. 4 , 464 S.E.2d 816 . [9] See ABA Standard 9.32(h). [10] In the Matter of Wittes, 267 Ga. 52 , 472 S.E.2d 429 (1996); In the Matter of Bailey, 267 Ga. 370 , 478 S.E.2d 131 (1996). [11] See Nasco, Inc. v. Gimbert, 239 Ga. 675 , 238 S.E.2d 368 (1977); Ulman Woolen Co. v. Magill, 155 Ga. 555 , 117 S.E. 657 (1923). [12] Nonsupport is, of course, punishable by contempt in this state, as is any other violation of a court order. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
In the Matter of Nicholson
green
1 sentence1994As this court stated in Nicholson, “[t]he confidence of the public cannot be maintained if a member of the bar is allowed to practice after having been convicted of a wilful failure to obey the law in such a sensitive area.” Id. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Williams v. State
green
2 sentences1988Williams v. State, 157 Ga. App. 494 (2) ( 277 SE2d 781 ) (1981). 1988Williams v. State, 157 Ga. App. 494 (2) ( 277 SE2d 781 ) (1981). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Gideon v. Wainwright
green
1 sentence1980Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335 (83 SC 792, 9 LE2d 799), exposited the constitutional right of a defendant to the services of an attorney at every stage of a criminal trial. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
In re Metzenbaum
neutral
2 sentences1975It follows, as an incident of the constitutional separation of powers, that the courts are not to interfere with the free exercise of the discretionary powers of the attorneys of the United States in their control over criminal prosecutions." Under this line of reasoning it has been held that a trial judge may not investigate a crime and recommend prosecution (In Re Metzenbaum, 26 Ohio Misc. 47 ( 265 NE2d 345 ) (1970)); may not compel a prosecutor to investigate and prosecute alleged crimes (Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller, 477 F2d 375 *271 (1973)); may not determine whi 1975It follows, as an incident of the constitutional separation of powers, that the courts are not to interfere with the free exercise of the discretionary powers of the attorneys of the United States in their control over criminal prosecutions." Under this line of reasoning it has been held that a trial judge may not investigate a crime and recommend prosecution (In Re Metzenbaum, 26 Ohio Misc. 47 ( 265 NE2d 345 ) (1970)); may not compel a prosecutor to investigate and prosecute alleged crimes (Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller, 477 F2d 375 *271 (1973)); may not determine whi | 1 | 1975–1975 |
People v. Potts
green
2 sentences1975It follows, as an incident of the constitutional separation of powers, that the courts are not to interfere with the free exercise of the discretionary powers of the attorneys of the United States in their control over criminal prosecutions." Under this line of reasoning it has been held that a trial judge may not investigate a crime and recommend prosecution (In Re Metzenbaum, 26 Ohio Misc. 47 ( 265 NE2d 345 ) (1970)); may not compel a prosecutor to investigate and prosecute alleged crimes (Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller, 477 F2d 375 *271 (1973)); may not determine whi 1975It follows, as an incident of the constitutional separation of powers, that the courts are not to interfere with the free exercise of the discretionary powers of the attorneys of the United States in their control over criminal prosecutions." Under this line of reasoning it has been held that a trial judge may not investigate a crime and recommend prosecution (In Re Metzenbaum, 26 Ohio Misc. 47 ( 265 NE2d 345 ) (1970)); may not compel a prosecutor to investigate and prosecute alleged crimes (Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller, 477 F2d 375 *271 (1973)); may not determine whi | 1 | 1975–1975 |
People v. Municipal Court
green
2 sentences1975It follows, as an incident of the constitutional separation of powers, that the courts are not to interfere with the free exercise of the discretionary powers of the attorneys of the United States in their control over criminal prosecutions." Under this line of reasoning it has been held that a trial judge may not investigate a crime and recommend prosecution (In Re Metzenbaum, 26 Ohio Misc. 47 ( 265 NE2d 345 ) (1970)); may not compel a prosecutor to investigate and prosecute alleged crimes (Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller, 477 F2d 375 *271 (1973)); may not determine whi 1975It follows, as an incident of the constitutional separation of powers, that the courts are not to interfere with the free exercise of the discretionary powers of the attorneys of the United States in their control over criminal prosecutions." Under this line of reasoning it has been held that a trial judge may not investigate a crime and recommend prosecution (In Re Metzenbaum, 26 Ohio Misc. 47 ( 265 NE2d 345 ) (1970)); may not compel a prosecutor to investigate and prosecute alleged crimes (Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller, 477 F2d 375 *271 (1973)); may not determine whi | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Hill v. Balkcom
green
2 sentences1972"Where counsel, representing a defendant in a criminal case, is a member of the bar in good standing, and, in representing his client in the trial of his case, gives his complete loyalty to his client, serves him in good faith to the best of his ability, and his service is of such a character as to preserve the essential integrity of the proceedings in a court of justice, the requirements of due process within the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution and Art. 1, Sec. 1, Par. 3 of the Constitution of Georgia are met." Hill v. Balkcom, 213 Ga. 58 (1) ( 96 SE2d 589 ). 1972"Where counsel, representing a defendant in a criminal case, is a member of the bar in good standing, and, in representing his client in the trial of his case, gives his complete loyalty to his client, serves him in good faith to the best of his ability, and his service is of such a character as to preserve the essential integrity of the proceedings in a court of justice, the requirements of due process within the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution and Art. 1, Sec. 1, Par. 3 of the Constitution of Georgia are met." Hill v. Balkcom, 213 Ga. 58 (1) ( 96 SE2d 589 ). | 1 | 1972–1972 |
In Re Meraux
green
2 sentences1960They include In Re Proposed Disciplinary Action, 103 So.2d 632 (Florida), In Re Colorado Bar Asociation, 137 Colo. 357 ( 325 P. 2d 932 ), In Re Meraux, 202 La. 736 ( 12 So. 2d 798 ), and perhaps a few others. 1960They include In Re Proposed Disciplinary Action, 103 So.2d 632 (Florida), In Re Colorado Bar Asociation, 137 Colo. 357 ( 325 P. 2d 932 ), In Re Meraux, 202 La. 736 ( 12 So. 2d 798 ), and perhaps a few others. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
In Re Proposed Disciplinary Action by Florida Bar Against Circuit Judge
green
1 sentence1960They include In Re Proposed Disciplinary Action, 103 So.2d 632 (Florida), In Re Colorado Bar Asociation, 137 Colo. 357 ( 325 P. 2d 932 ), In Re Meraux, 202 La. 736 ( 12 So. 2d 798 ), and perhaps a few others. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Petition of Colorado Bar Association
green
2 sentences1960They include In Re Proposed Disciplinary Action, 103 So.2d 632 (Florida), In Re Colorado Bar Asociation, 137 Colo. 357 ( 325 P. 2d 932 ), In Re Meraux, 202 La. 736 ( 12 So. 2d 798 ), and perhaps a few others. 1960They include In Re Proposed Disciplinary Action, 103 So.2d 632 (Florida), In Re Colorado Bar Asociation, 137 Colo. 357 ( 325 P. 2d 932 ), In Re Meraux, 202 La. 736 ( 12 So. 2d 798 ), and perhaps a few others. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Ex parte Cohen
neutral
2 sentences1936E. 1062); and this would be true although his conviction was pending on motion for new trial, or on appeal to this court (Ex parte Cohen, 72 Or. 570 , 144 Pac. 79 ), and because of his actions before that court, which are set out in the order of suspension already quoted in this opinion, which they adjudged to be a contempt of the court, a serious “dereliction of duty due by a member of the bar to the court,” of deceit and wilful misconduct in his profession, and “indecent behavior in the courthouse, whereby he became a nuisance to the court and to his brother members of the bar and to the pub 1936E. 1062); and this would be true although his conviction was pending on motion for new trial, or on appeal to this court (Ex parte Cohen, 72 Or. 570 , 144 Pac. 79 ), and because of his actions before that court, which are set out in the order of suspension already quoted in this opinion, which they adjudged to be a contempt of the court, a serious “dereliction of duty due by a member of the bar to the court,” of deceit and wilful misconduct in his profession, and “indecent behavior in the courthouse, whereby he became a nuisance to the court and to his brother members of the bar and to the pub | 1 | 1936–1936 |
In re Disbarment of Macy
neutral
2 sentences1932In re Macy, 109 Kan. 1 ( 196 Pac. 1095 , 14 A. L. 1932In re Macy, 109 Kan. 1 ( 196 Pac. 1095 , 14 A. L. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Baker v. Richmond City Mill Works
green
2 sentences1912Baker v. Richmond City Mill Works, 105 Ga. 225 ( 31 S. E. 426 ); Jennings v. Stripling, 127 Ga. 778, 785 ( 56 S. E. 1026 ); Proctor v. Crooker, 129 Ga. 732 ( 59 S. E. 781 ); McCarthy v. Lazarus, 137 Ga. 282 ( 72 S. E. 493 ). 3. 1912Baker v. Richmond City Mill Works, 105 Ga. 225 ( 31 S. E. 426 ); Jennings v. Stripling, 127 Ga. 778, 785 ( 56 S. E. 1026 ); Proctor v. Crooker, 129 Ga. 732 ( 59 S. E. 781 ); McCarthy v. Lazarus, 137 Ga. 282 ( 72 S. E. 493 ). 3. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
| Proctor v. Crooker neutral | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Goodin v. Mills
green
1 sentence1912Baker v. Richmond City Mill Works, 105 Ga. 225 ( 31 S. E. 426 ); Jennings v. Stripling, 127 Ga. 778, 785 ( 56 S. E. 1026 ); Proctor v. Crooker, 129 Ga. 732 ( 59 S. E. 781 ); McCarthy v. Lazarus, 137 Ga. 282 ( 72 S. E. 493 ). 3. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Austin v. J. W. Lewis & Co.
neutral
1 sentence1912Baker v. Richmond City Mill Works, 105 Ga. 225 ( 31 S. E. 426 ); Jennings v. Stripling, 127 Ga. 778, 785 ( 56 S. E. 1026 ); Proctor v. Crooker, 129 Ga. 732 ( 59 S. E. 781 ); McCarthy v. Lazarus, 137 Ga. 282 ( 72 S. E. 493 ). 3. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
| Blalock v. Pillsbury neutral | 1 | 1897–1897 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.