18 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1955–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pennington v. Stategreen2 sentences2006See Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss.1983); Jordan v. State, 365 So.2d 1198 (Miss.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 885 , 100 S.Ct. 175 , 62 L.Ed.2d 114 (1979); Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. 544 , 128 So.2d 368 (1961). 1995Goodson v. State, 566 So.2d 1142, 1153 (Miss. 1990) ( citing Garrett v. State, 549 So.2d 1325, 1330 (Miss. 1989); Miskelley v. State, 480 So.2d 1104, 1108 (Miss. 1985); Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss. 1983). | 6 | 6 |
Conner v. Statered2 sentences2018Notably, Weatherspoon overruled Conner v. State, 632 So. 2d 1239 (Miss. 1993), to the extent it held that testimony concerning a lie-detector test was proper in order to rehabilitate an impeached witness. 2018Notably, Weatherspoon overruled Conner v. State , 632 So.2d 1239 (Miss. 1993), to the extent it held that testimony concerning a lie-detector test was proper in order to rehabilitate an impeached witness. | 3 | 9 |
Mattox v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. at 555-62 , 128 So.2d. at 368-74 (holding that "neither the taking of a lie detector test nor the result thereof should be admitted in evidence"); Thomas v. State, 426 So.2d *163 795, 795-96 (Miss.1983) (warning not to allow testimony that defendant took polygraph test on retrial); Harrison v. State, 307 So.2d 557, 562 (Miss.1975) (reaffirming holding that "neither the taking of a lie detector test nor the result thereof is admissible as evidence"). ¶ 15. 1996See Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. at 555-62 , 128 So. 2d. at 368-74 (holding that "neither the taking of a lie detector test nor the result thereof should be admitted in evidence"); Thomas v. State, 426 So. 2d 795, 795-96 (Miss. 1983) (warning not to allow testimony that defendant took polygraph test on retrial); Harrison v. State, 307 So. 2d 557, 562 (Miss. 1975) (reaffirming holding that "neither the taking of a lie detector test nor the result thereof is admissible as evidence"). ¶15. | 2 | 7 |
Harrison v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. at 555-62 , 128 So.2d. at 368-74 (holding that "neither the taking of a lie detector test nor the result thereof should be admitted in evidence"); Thomas v. State, 426 So.2d *163 795, 795-96 (Miss.1983) (warning not to allow testimony that defendant took polygraph test on retrial); Harrison v. State, 307 So.2d 557, 562 (Miss.1975) (reaffirming holding that "neither the taking of a lie detector test nor the result thereof is admissible as evidence"). ¶ 15. 1996See Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. at 555-62 , 128 So. 2d. at 368-74 (holding that "neither the taking of a lie detector test nor the result thereof should be admitted in evidence"); Thomas v. State, 426 So. 2d 795, 795-96 (Miss. 1983) (warning not to allow testimony that defendant took polygraph test on retrial); Harrison v. State, 307 So. 2d 557, 562 (Miss. 1975) (reaffirming holding that "neither the taking of a lie detector test nor the result thereof is admissible as evidence"). ¶15. | 2 | 2 |
Garrett v. Stategreen2 sentences1995Goodson v. State, 566 So.2d 1142, 1153 (Miss. 1990) ( citing Garrett v. State, 549 So.2d 1325, 1330 (Miss. 1989); Miskelley v. State, 480 So.2d 1104, 1108 (Miss. 1985); Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss. 1983). 1990Garrett v. State, 549 So.2d 1325, 1330 (Miss. 1989); Miskelley v. State, 480 So.2d 1104, 1108 (Miss. 1985); Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss. 1983); Jordan v. State, 365 So.2d 1198, 1204 (Miss. 1978). | 2 | 2 |
Miskelley v. Stategreen2 sentences1995Goodson v. State, 566 So.2d 1142, 1153 (Miss. 1990) ( citing Garrett v. State, 549 So.2d 1325, 1330 (Miss. 1989); Miskelley v. State, 480 So.2d 1104, 1108 (Miss. 1985); Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss. 1983). 1990Garrett v. State, 549 So.2d 1325, 1330 (Miss. 1989); Miskelley v. State, 480 So.2d 1104, 1108 (Miss. 1985); Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss. 1983); Jordan v. State, 365 So.2d 1198, 1204 (Miss. 1978). | 2 | 2 |
Jordan v. Stategreen2 sentences2006See Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss.1983); Jordan v. State, 365 So.2d 1198 (Miss.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 885 , 100 S.Ct. 175 , 62 L.Ed.2d 114 (1979); Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. 544 , 128 So.2d 368 (1961). 1994See Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss. 1983); Jordan v. State, 365 So.2d 1198 (Miss. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 885 , 100 S.Ct. 175 , 62 L.Ed.2d 114 (1979); Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. 544 , 128 So.2d 368 (1961). | 1 | 5 |
Goodson v. Stategreen2 sentences1995Goodson v. State, 566 So.2d 1142, 1153 (Miss. 1990) ( citing Garrett v. State, 549 So.2d 1325, 1330 (Miss. 1989); Miskelley v. State, 480 So.2d 1104, 1108 (Miss. 1985); Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss. 1983). 1992In Goodson v. State, 566 So.2d 1142 (Miss. 1990), we said there is no *1058 reason to believe an expert's opinion as to the truthfulness of a child is any more admissible than the results of a lie detector test, and noted that a majority of courts preclude such testimony. | 1 | 2 |
Manning v. Stategreen1 sentence2008Robert correctly states in his brief that “a witness’s unimpeached or unquestioned credibility may not be bolstered by any means[.]” Manning v. State, 929 So.2d 885, 895 (¶ 29) (Miss.2006) (quoting Conner v. State, 632 So.2d 1239, 1258 (Miss.1993) (overruled as to the admissibility of the willingness to take a lie detector test)). | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Stategreen1 sentence1996See Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. at 555-62 , 128 So. 2d. at 368-74 (holding that "neither the taking of a lie detector test nor the result thereof should be admitted in evidence"); Thomas v. State, 426 So. 2d 795, 795-96 (Miss. 1983) (warning not to allow testimony that defendant took polygraph test on retrial); Harrison v. State, 307 So. 2d 557, 562 (Miss. 1975) (reaffirming holding that "neither the taking of a lie detector test nor the result thereof is admissible as evidence"). ¶15. | 1 | 1 |
Carr v. Stategreen2 sentences1995Carr v. State, 655 So. 2d 824, 836 (Miss. 1995). 1995Carr, 655 So. 2d at 836 ; Conner, 632 So. 2d at 1257 . | 1 | 1 |
Junior Food Stores, Inc. v. Ricegreen1 sentence1995Junior Food Stores v. Rice, 671 So. 2d 67, 75 (Miss. 1996); Conner v. State, 632 So. 2d 1239, 1257 (Miss. 1993). | 1 | 1 |
House v. Stategreen1 sentence1992Id. at 1153 ; Compare, Griffith v. State, 584 So.2d 383, 386 (Miss. 1991); House v. State, 445 So.2d 815, 822 (Miss. 1984) (involved a hypnotist's opinion concerning the accused truthfulness). | 1 | 1 |
Griffith v. Stategreen1 sentence1992Id. at 1153 ; Compare, Griffith v. State, 584 So.2d 383, 386 (Miss. 1991); House v. State, 445 So.2d 815, 822 (Miss. 1984) (involved a hypnotist's opinion concerning the accused truthfulness). | 1 | 1 |
Hawkins v. Stategreen2 sentences1975See also, Hawkins v. State, 222 Miss. 753 , 77 So.2d 263 (1955). 1975See also, Hawkins v. State, 222 Miss. 753 , 77 So.2d 263 (1955). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences2006But see Jones v. State, 606 So.2d 1051, 1057-58 (Miss.1992) ("In Goodson v. State , 566 So.2d [at] 1142 ... we said there is no reason to believe an expert's opinion as to the truthfulness of a child is any more admissible than the results of a lie detector test, and noted that a majority of courts preclude such testimony.... 2003But see Jones v. State, 606 So. 2d 1051, 1057-58 (Miss. 1992) (“In Goodson v. State, 566 So. 2d [at] 1142 ... we said there is no reason to believe an expert’s opinion as to the truthfulness of a child is any more admissible than the results of a lie detector test, and noted that a majority of courts preclude such testimony.... | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Canadian Ace Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
green
2 sentences2006See Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss.1983); Jordan v. State, 365 So.2d 1198 (Miss.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 885 , 100 S.Ct. 175 , 62 L.Ed.2d 114 (1979); Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. 544 , 128 So.2d 368 (1961). 1994See Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss. 1983); Jordan v. State, 365 So.2d 1198 (Miss. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 885 , 100 S.Ct. 175 , 62 L.Ed.2d 114 (1979); Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. 544 , 128 So.2d 368 (1961). | 4 | 1994–2006 |
LeDuc v. Florida
green
2 sentences2006See Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss.1983); Jordan v. State, 365 So.2d 1198 (Miss.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 885 , 100 S.Ct. 175 , 62 L.Ed.2d 114 (1979); Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. 544 , 128 So.2d 368 (1961). 1994See Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss. 1983); Jordan v. State, 365 So.2d 1198 (Miss. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 885 , 100 S.Ct. 175 , 62 L.Ed.2d 114 (1979); Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. 544 , 128 So.2d 368 (1961). | 4 | 1994–2006 |
United States Gypsum Co. v. United States
green
2 sentences2006See Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss.1983); Jordan v. State, 365 So.2d 1198 (Miss.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 885 , 100 S.Ct. 175 , 62 L.Ed.2d 114 (1979); Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. 544 , 128 So.2d 368 (1961). 1994See Pennington v. State, 437 So.2d 37, 40 (Miss. 1983); Jordan v. State, 365 So.2d 1198 (Miss. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 885 , 100 S.Ct. 175 , 62 L.Ed.2d 114 (1979); Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. 544 , 128 So.2d 368 (1961). | 4 | 1994–2006 |
Weatherspoon v. State
green
2 sentences2018Weatherspoon, 732 So. 2d at 161-62 . 2018Weatherspoon , 732 So.2d at 161 -62 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Frye v. United States
red
2 sentences1961As the matter is stated in one of the earliest reported cases on the subject: ‘We think the systolic blood pressure deception test has not yet gained such standing and scientific recognition among physiological and psychological authorities as would justify the courts in admitting expert testimony deduced from the discovery, development, and experiments thus far made.’ Frye v. United States, 54 App. D.C. 46 , 293 F. 1013, 1014 , 34 A.L.R. 145 . 1961As the matter is stated in one of the earliest reported cases on the subject: ‘We think the systolic blood pressure deception test has not yet gained such standing and scientific recognition among physiological and psychological authorities as would justify the courts in admitting expert testimony deduced from the discovery, development, and experiments thus far made.’ Frye v. United States, 54 App. D.C. 46 , 293 F. 1013, 1014 , 34 A.L.R. 145 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Pittman v. State
green
2 sentences1961In Pittman v. State, 236 Miss. 592 , 111 So. 2d 415 , it was shown that the deputy sheriff had carried the defendant and another to Jackson to take a lie detector test. 1961In Pittman v. State, 236 Miss. 592 , 111 So. 2d 415 , it was shown that the deputy sheriff had carried the defendant and another to Jackson to take a lie detector test. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
State v. Wade
neutral
2 sentences1955The indictment, omitting the formal parts, is as follows: “. . . did unlawfully and designedly, with actual violence, make an assault upon the body of one Mrs. Elizabeth Louise Jones, a female, and the said Joseph Hawkins therein did then and there lay hold of the body of the said Mrs. Elisabeth Louise Jones upon the bed of the said Mrs. Elisabeth Louise Jones, then and there situate, with the felonious intent, design and endeavor, her, the said Mrs. Elizabeth Louise Jones, violently, knowingly, forcibly and against her will feloniously to ravish and carnally know.” (Emphasis ours.) The ground 1955The indictment, omitting the formal parts, is as follows: “. . . did unlawfully and designedly, with actual violence, make an assault upon the body of one Mrs. Elizabeth Louise Jones, a female, and the said Joseph Hawkins therein did then and there lay hold of the body of the said Mrs. Elisabeth Louise Jones upon the bed of the said Mrs. Elisabeth Louise Jones, then and there situate, with the felonious intent, design and endeavor, her, the said Mrs. Elizabeth Louise Jones, violently, knowingly, forcibly and against her will feloniously to ravish and carnally know.” (Emphasis ours.) The ground | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.