lie detector test (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

lie detector test in Missouri

11 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (10)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Bibeegreen
moctapp · 1973 · cited in 2 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1977–1982
2 sentences

1982In State v. Bibee, 496 S.W.2d 305, 316 [21][22] (Mo.App.1973) the defendant contended he was entitled to show that he had offered to take a lie detector test because this would show his sincere feeling about his denial that he had committed the crime.

1977In State v. Bibee, 496 S.W.2d 305 (Mo.App.1973) this court held that the trial court did not err in rejecting evidence offered by the defendant to prove that prior to the trial he was willing to undergo a lie detector test concerning his guilt or innocence.

12
State v. Kenleygreen
mo · 1997 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
1 sentence

1999Rule 29.15(k); State v. Kenley, 952 S.W.2d 250, 266 (Mo. banc 1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 892 , 139 L.Ed.2d 878 (1998).

11
Campbell v. Personnel Board of Kansas Citygreen
moctapp · 1984 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990
1 sentence

1990Cf. Campbell v. Personnel Board of Kansas City, 666 S.W.2d 806, 810-11 (Mo. App.1984).

11
State v. Biddlegreen
mo · 1980 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990
1 sentence

1990In State v. Biddle, 599 S.W.2d 182, 185 [1] (Mo. banc 1980), our supreme court held that the results of lie detector tests are inadmissible as evidence in a criminal trial “because they lack sufficient support for their reliability.” The court also said: “Likewise, inadmissible in evidence are an accused’s offer or professed willingness to submit to a polygraph examination, ... and testimony or prosecutorial comment to the effect that the accused was unwilling to undergo a polygraph examination.” In the case at bar, Continental’s counsel, in his opening statement, said: “The question of puniti

11
State v. Stidhamgreen
mo · 1957 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
1 sentence

1977State v. Weindorf, 361 S.W.2d 806, 811 [17] (Mo.1962); State v. Stidham, 305 S.W.2d 7, 18 [20] (Mo.1957); State v. Cole, 354 Mo. 181 , 188 S.W.2d 43 [13] (1945).

11
State v. Changgreen
haw · 1962 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
2 sentences

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

11
People v. Parrellagreen
calctapp · 1958 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
2 sentences

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

11
State v. Mottramgreen
me · 1962 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
2 sentences

1977The state argues, however, that the statements attributed to the defendant by Ingram are admissible because they “show more than the defendant’s mere unwillingness to take the test, i. e., that his refusal or unwillingness was grounded on his belief that the machine was trustworthy and that it would therefore expose his deception.” The state relies upon this language in State v. Mottram, 158 Me. 325 , 184 A.2d 225, 230 (1962): “Consciousness of guilt could be shown by evidence that a witness refused to take a lie detector test on the ground that he believed the test was trustworthy or dependab

1977The state argues, however, that the statements attributed to the defendant by Ingram are admissible because they “show more than the defendant’s mere unwillingness to take the test, i. e., that his refusal or unwillingness was grounded on his belief that the machine was trustworthy and that it would therefore expose his deception.” The state relies upon this language in State v. Mottram, 158 Me. 325 , 184 A.2d 225, 230 (1962): “Consciousness of guilt could be shown by evidence that a witness refused to take a lie detector test on the ground that he believed the test was trustworthy or dependab

11
State v. BRITTgreen
sc · 1959 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
2 sentences

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

11
State v. Weindorfgreen
mo · 1962 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
1 sentence

1977State v. Weindorf, 361 S.W.2d 806, 811 [17] (Mo.1962); State v. Stidham, 305 S.W.2d 7, 18 [20] (Mo.1957); State v. Cole, 354 Mo. 181 , 188 S.W.2d 43 [13] (1945).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (23)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Faught green
moctapp · 1977
2 sentences

1978State v. Faught, 546 S.W.2d 515 [1] (Mo.App. 1977).

1977State v. Fields, 434 S.W.2d 507 (Mo.1968); State v. Faught, 546 S.W.2d 515 (Mo.App.1977) and cases cited therein.

21977–1978
State v. Fields green
mo · 1968
2 sentences

1977“A. His statement that he made to me was that Detective Lindsey had come out there to talk to him about to take a polygraph test about Butch’s disappearance and he said, ‘You know that I cannot do that,’ and he was upset and nervous, and he said, ‘Can they make me take a polygraph test?’ ” In Missouri, in the absence of a stipulation between the state and the defendant, State v. Fields, 434 S.W.2d 507 (Mo.1968), results of a lie detector test are not admissible in evidence.

1977State v. Fields, 434 S.W.2d 507 (Mo.1968); State v. Faught, 546 S.W.2d 515 (Mo.App.1977) and cases cited therein.

21977–1977
Blackburn v. Alabama green
scotus · 1960
2 sentences

1964He cites certain federal cases, such as Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 , 56 S.Ct. 461 , 80 L.Ed. 682 ; Blackburn v. Alabama, 361 U.S. 199 , 80 S.Ct. 274 , 4 L.Ed.2d 242 ; Reck v. Pate, 367 U.S. 433 , 81 S.Ct. 1541 , 6 L.Ed.2d 948 ; and Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293 , 83 S.Ct. 745 , holding generally that the admission of an involuntary confession is a fundamental error depriving a defendant of due process.

1964He cites certain federal cases, such as Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 , 56 S.Ct. 461 , 80 L.Ed. 682 ; Blackburn v. Alabama, 361 U.S. 199 , 80 S.Ct. 274 , 4 L.Ed.2d 242 ; Reck v. Pate, 367 U.S. 433 , 81 S.Ct. 1541 , 6 L.Ed.2d 948 ; and Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293 , 83 S.Ct. 745 , holding generally that the admission of an involuntary confession is a fundamental error depriving a defendant of due process.

21960–1964
State Ex Rel. Kemper v. Vincent green
mo · 2006
1 sentence

2016Id. at 49-50 .

12016–2016
Wellington v. Brodeur green
scotus · 1998
1 sentence

1999Rule 29.15(k); State v. Kenley, 952 S.W.2d 250, 266 (Mo. banc 1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 892 , 139 L.Ed.2d 878 (1998).

11999–1999
Triestman v. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility green
scotus · 1998
1 sentence

1999Rule 29.15(k); State v. Kenley, 952 S.W.2d 250, 266 (Mo. banc 1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 892 , 139 L.Ed.2d 878 (1998).

11999–1999
State v. Hoopes green
mo · 1976
1 sentence

1997Even if there had been a plea agreement, and the State breached it after obtaining a second confession, and Hall did pass a lie detector test, HalTs only relief would be the exclusion of the second confession. 3 Id.

11997–1997
Solem v. Stumes green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

1992Solem v. Stumes, 465 U.S. 638, 640 , 104 S.Ct. 1338, 1340 , 79 L.Ed.2d 579 (1984).

1992Solem v. Stumes, 465 U.S. 638, 640 , 104 S.Ct. 1338, 1340 , 79 L.Ed.2d 579 (1984).

11992–1992
State v. Driver green
nj · 1962
2 sentences

1977State v. Green, 254 Iowa 1379 , 121 N.W.2d 89 (1963); State v. Stafford, 213 Kan. 152 , 515 P.2d 769 (1973); State v. Driver, 38 N.J. 255 , 183 A.2d 655 (1962).

1977State v. Green, 254 Iowa 1379 , 121 N.W.2d 89 (1963); State v. Stafford, 213 Kan. 152 , 515 P.2d 769 (1973); State v. Driver, 38 N.J. 255 , 183 A.2d 655 (1962).

11977–1977
Commonwealth v. Williams green
pasuperct · 1973
2 sentences

1977In Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973) a witness for the state referred to defendant’s refusal to take a lie detector test.

1977In Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973) a witness for the state referred to defendant’s refusal to take a lie detector test.

11977–1977
State v. Emory green
kan · 1962
2 sentences

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

11977–1977
State v. Cole green
mo · 1945
2 sentences

1977State v. Weindorf, 361 S.W.2d 806, 811 [17] (Mo.1962); State v. Stidham, 305 S.W.2d 7, 18 [20] (Mo.1957); State v. Cole, 354 Mo. 181 , 188 S.W.2d 43 [13] (1945).

1977State v. Weindorf, 361 S.W.2d 806, 811 [17] (Mo.1962); State v. Stidham, 305 S.W.2d 7, 18 [20] (Mo.1957); State v. Cole, 354 Mo. 181 , 188 S.W.2d 43 [13] (1945).

11977–1977
Bowen v. Eyman green
azd · 1970
1 sentence

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

11977–1977
State v. Kolander green
minn · 1952
2 sentences

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

11977–1977
State v. Green green
iowa · 1963
2 sentences

1977State v. Green, 254 Iowa 1379 , 121 N.W.2d 89 (1963); State v. Stafford, 213 Kan. 152 , 515 P.2d 769 (1973); State v. Driver, 38 N.J. 255 , 183 A.2d 655 (1962).

1977State v. Green, 254 Iowa 1379 , 121 N.W.2d 89 (1963); State v. Stafford, 213 Kan. 152 , 515 P.2d 769 (1973); State v. Driver, 38 N.J. 255 , 183 A.2d 655 (1962).

11977–1977
Mills v. People green
colo · 1959
2 sentences

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

11977–1977
State v. Hegel green
ohioctapp · 1964
2 sentences

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

11977–1977
People v. Carter green
cal · 1957
2 sentences

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

1977Bowen v. Eyman, 324 F.Supp. 339 (D.Ariz.1970); People v. Carter, 48 Cal.2d 737 , 312 P.2d 665 (1957); People v. Parrella, 158 Cal.App.2d 140 , 322 P.2d 83, 87 (1958); Mills v. People, 139 Colo. 397 , 339 P.2d 998 (1959); State v. Chang, 46 Haw. 22 , 374 P.2d 5, 12 (1962); State v. Emory, 190 Kan. 406 , 375 P.2d 585 (1962); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N.W.2d 458 (1952); State v. Hegel, 9 Ohio App.2d 12 , 222 N.E.2d 666 (1964); Commonwealth v. Williams, 224 Pa.Super. 298 , 307 A.2d 289 (1973); State v. Britt, 235 S.C. 395 , 111 S.E.2d 669, 682 (1959).

11977–1977
State v. Stafford green
kan · 1973
2 sentences

1977State v. Green, 254 Iowa 1379 , 121 N.W.2d 89 (1963); State v. Stafford, 213 Kan. 152 , 515 P.2d 769 (1973); State v. Driver, 38 N.J. 255 , 183 A.2d 655 (1962).

1977State v. Green, 254 Iowa 1379 , 121 N.W.2d 89 (1963); State v. Stafford, 213 Kan. 152 , 515 P.2d 769 (1973); State v. Driver, 38 N.J. 255 , 183 A.2d 655 (1962).

11977–1977
Meyer v. Commonwealth green
kyctapphigh · 1971
2 sentences

1977In Hegel , the court, in holding that defendant’s refusal to take a lie detector test should not have been revealed to the jury, referred to “the manifest weight of the type of testimony erroneously admitted.” In one case, Meyer v. Commonwealth, 472 S.W.2d 479 (Ky.App.1971), the court held improper the admission of evidence of the defendant’s refusal to take a lie detector test but also held that there was other evidence of defendant’s guilt, including his own confession, which was so “overwhelming and conclusive” that reference to his refusal was harmless.

1977In Hegel , the court, in holding that defendant’s refusal to take a lie detector test should not have been revealed to the jury, referred to “the manifest weight of the type of testimony erroneously admitted.” In one case, Meyer v. Commonwealth, 472 S.W.2d 479 (Ky.App.1971), the court held improper the admission of evidence of the defendant’s refusal to take a lie detector test but also held that there was other evidence of defendant’s guilt, including his own confession, which was so “overwhelming and conclusive” that reference to his refusal was harmless.

11977–1977
Brown v. Mississippi green
scotus · 1936
11964–1964
Reck v. Pate green
scotus · 1961
11964–1964
Townsend v. Sain red
scotus · 1963
11964–1964

Where else courts name it

CA 63 (1950–2025) IL 55 (1948–2026) GA 50 (1975–2016) TX 43 (1952–2023) MD 39 (1958–2025) PA 37 (1970–2021) FL 31 (1953–2010) NY 29 (1961–2025) LA 23 (1972–2022) OH 21 (1960–2024) MI 20 (1949–2025) NJ 19 (1961–2007) MS 18 (1955–2018) IN 16 (1974–2023) KS 14 (1959–2014) MA 12 (1973–2026) CO 12 (1959–2015) MN 11 (1952–2017) MO 11 (1960–2016) TN 10 (1958–2000) DC 9 (1978–2016) WA 9 (1979–2026) AZ 9 (1962–2016) NM 9 (1961–2018) ME 9 (1962–2009) AR 9 (1977–2010) UT 8 (1991–2026) IA 8 (1960–2009) KY 7 (1957–2016) SD 7 (1973–2014) OK 7 (1951–2009) HI 6 (1962–2019) AL 6 (1972–2002) VA 6 (1965–2010) SC 6 (1959–2022) NE 5 (1949–2018) DE 5 (1981–2023) NC 4 (1975–2009) ND 4 (1950–1998) WY 4 (1986–2020) OR 4 (1981–2020) WI 3 (1964–1974) ID 3 (1982–1991) AK 3 (1979–1996) RI 3 (1971–1994) MT 2 (1964–1978) NH 2 (1965–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check