Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Santosgreen2 sentences1997See Santos, 104 Wash.2d at 146-50 , 702 P.2d 1179 . 1997See Santos, 104 Wn.2d at 146-50 . | 2 | 2 |
State v. Garzagreen2 sentences2014It "must be the overarching principle throughout the inquiry." Id. at 368 . 2014It “must be the overarching principle throughout the inquiry.” Id. at 368 . ¶16 Garza also determined that the trial court’s waiver determination is a factual issue to which the abuse of discretion standard applies on review. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Marriage of Landry
green
2 sentences2019E.g., In re Marriage of Landry, 103 Wn.2d 807, 809 , 699 P.2d 214 (1985). 2019E.g., In re Marriage of Landry, 103 Wn.2d 807, 809 , 699 P.2d 214 (1985). | 2 | 2017–2019 |
Alejandre v. Bull
green
2 sentences2010The overarching rule in Alejandre guides us here: Parties should be limited to contract remedies when a loss potentially implicates contract and tort relief. 159 Wash.2d at 681 , 153 P.3d 864 . 2010The overarching rule in Alejandre guides us here: Parties should be limited to contract remedies when a loss potentially implicates contract and tort relief. 159 Wn.2d at 681 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1
green
2 sentences2010LTK Consulting relies heavily on one of these cases, Berschauer/Phillips, 124 Wash.2d at 822 , 881 P.2d 986 , but Berschauer/Phillips does not support its argument that the economic loss rule applies here. 2010LTK Consulting relies heavily on one of these cases, Berschauer /Phillips, 124 Wn.2d at 822 , but Berschauer /Phillips does not support its argument that the economic loss rule applies here. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Taylor v. Stevens County
green
2 sentences2010Taylor, 111 Wash.2d at 163 , 759 P.2d 447 ; Osborn, 157 Wash.2d at 27-28 , 134 P.3d 197 . ¶ 24 Over time, our courts have identified four exceptions to the public duty doctrine—legislative intent, failure to enforce, rescue, and special relationship. 2010Taylor, 111 Wn.2d at 163 ; Osborn, 157 Wn.2d at 27-28 . ¶24 Over time, our courts have identified four “exceptions” to the public duty doctrine — legislative intent, failure to enforce, rescue, and special relationship. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Osborn v. Mason County
green
2 sentences2010Taylor, 111 Wash.2d at 163 , 759 P.2d 447 ; Osborn, 157 Wash.2d at 27-28 , 134 P.3d 197 . ¶ 24 Over time, our courts have identified four exceptions to the public duty doctrine—legislative intent, failure to enforce, rescue, and special relationship. 2010Taylor, 111 Wn.2d at 163 ; Osborn, 157 Wn.2d at 27-28 . ¶24 Over time, our courts have identified four “exceptions” to the public duty doctrine — legislative intent, failure to enforce, rescue, and special relationship. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Sheldon v. Fettig
green
2 sentences1998Sheldon v. Fettig, 129 Wn.2d 601, 609 , 919 P.2d 1209 (1996). 1998Sheldon v. Fettig, 129 Wn.2d 601, 609 , 919 P.2d 1209 (1996). | 2 | 1998–1998 |
R.B. v. C.W.
green
2 sentences2025In re Adoption of T.A.W., 186 Wn.2d 828, 840 , 383 P.3d 492 (2016); Abbess, 23 Wn. App. 2d at 484. 7 interpretation is to give effect to legislative intent. 2025In re Adoption of T.A.W., 186 Wn.2d 828, 840 , 383 P.3d 492 (2016); Abbess, 23 Wn. App. 2d at 484. 7 interpretation is to give effect to legislative intent. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Brown v. Voss
green
2 sentences2016App. 774, 779 , 217 P.3d 787 (2009) (citing Brown v. Voss, 105 Wn.2d 366, 371 , 715 P.2d 514 (1986)). 2016App. 774, 779 , 217 P.3d 787 (2009) (citing Brown v. Voss, 105 Wn.2d 366, 371 , 715 P.2d 514 (1986)). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Snyder v. Haynes
green
2 sentences2016App. 774, 779 , 217 P.3d 787 (2009) (citing Brown v. Voss, 105 Wn.2d 366, 371 , 715 P.2d 514 (1986)). 2016Although the grant language used in the easements before us is awkward and imprecise, we must be guided by the overarching rule for construing easements: “Courts interpret easement grants to give effect to the parties’ original intent.” Snyder v. Haynes, 152 Wn. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc.
green
2 sentences2013While the provision's language in Boguch may have been narrower, this difference in 133 170 Wn.2d 380 , 241 P.3d 1256 (2010)). 134 JcL 135 Jd at 401-02. 136 Jd 38 No. 68127-3-1 (Consolidated with No. 68522-8-l)/39 language does not negate the overarching rule.137 Aparty does not bring an action "on the contract" if the duty is "imposed by an external source, such as a statute or the common law."138 Thus, this argument is not helpful. 2013While the provision's language in Boguch may have been narrower, this difference in 133 170 Wn.2d 380 , 241 P.3d 1256 (2010)). 134 JcL 135 Jd at 401-02. 136 Jd 38 No. 68127-3-1 (Consolidated with No. 68522-8-l)/39 language does not negate the overarching rule.137 Aparty does not bring an action "on the contract" if the duty is "imposed by an external source, such as a statute or the common law."138 Thus, this argument is not helpful. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.