Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 North Carolina opinions name it 3 courts 2000–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. American Express Co.green1 sentence2017“The overarching standard is whether [D]efendant[’s] actions diminish overall competition, and hence consumer welfare.” Id. at 195. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Mareadygreen2 sentences2014“We reiterate that the overarching inquiry when assessing reasonable suspicion is always based on the totality of the circumstances.” State v. Maready, 362 N.C. 614, 619 , 669 S.E.2d 564, 567 (2008) (citation omitted). 2014“We reiterate that the overarching inquiry when assessing reasonable suspicion is always based on the totality of the circumstances.” State v. Maready, 362 N.C. 614, 619 , 669 S.E.2d 564, 567 (2008) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Church v. Hancockgreen2 sentences2006See, e.g., Church v. Hancock, 261 N.C. 764, 766 , 136 S.E.2d 81, 83 (1964). {27} Although the Court is free to look beyond the language of the agreement, the words chosen by the parties after careful negotiation are most helpful in ascertaining their intentions. 2006See, e.g., Church v. Hancock, 261 N.C. 764, 766 , 136 S.E.2d 81, 83 (1964). {27} Although the Court is free to look beyond the language of the agreement, the words chosen by the parties after careful negotiation are most helpful in ascertaining their intentions. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Villamonte-Marquezgreen2 sentences2000Furthermore, although not specifically listed in the Amendment, the United States Supreme Court has held that there can be some expectancy of privacy with regard to motor vehicles and vessels; however, “under the overarching principle of ‘reasonableness’ embodied in the Fourth Amendment, . . . the important factual differences between vessels located in waters offering ready access to the open sea and automobiles on principal thoroughfares . . . are sufficient to require a different result . . . .” United States v. Villamonte-Marquez, 462 U.S. 579, 588 , 77 L. 2000Furthermore, although not specifically listed in the Amendment, the United States Supreme Court has held that there can be some expectancy of privacy with regard to motor vehicles and vessels; however, “under the overarching principle of ‘reasonableness’ embodied in the Fourth Amendment, . . . the important factual differences between vessels located in waters offering ready access to the open sea and automobiles on principal thoroughfares . . . are sufficient to require a different result . . . .” United States v. Villamonte-Marquez, 462 U.S. 579, 588 , 77 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Miami University Ohio State University, the Chronicle of Higher Education, Intervening
green
1 sentence2020While conflict preemption exists where compliance with both state and federal law is impossible or where the state law stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress, conflict preemption does not exist in the present case because compliance with both the Public Records Act and FERPA is possible, and the Public Records Act does not stand as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress regarding the governance of education under Title 20 of the Unites States Code. -24- Lastly, defendants | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.