overarching principle (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

overarching principle in Ohio

10 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Lopez v. Quezadagreen
ohioctapp · 2014 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020"Pursuant to Civ.R. 8(D), an unresponsive defendant's failure to deny the specific allegations in a complaint results in the admission of those allegations." Lopez at ¶ 12 (citation omitted). {¶ 9} However, an overarching principle to guide a trial court in considering a default judgment application is that " '[a] plaintiff still needs to allege a valid claim in order to prevail, even against a neglectful defendant.' " Id. at ¶ 13 (citation omitted).

11
Keisling v. Keislinggreen
tenn · 2002 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 , 70 S.Ct. 652 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950) (citations omitted); see Keisling v. Keisling, 92 S.W.3d 374, 377 (Tenn. 2002) (citations omitted).

11
American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurantgreen
scotus · 2013 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, ___ U.S. ___, 133 S.Ct. 2304, 2309 (2013).

11
Ziang Sung Wan v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1924 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004See, e.g., Ziang Sung Wan v. United States (1924), 266 U.S. 1, 14-15 , 45 S.Ct. 1 , 69 L.Ed. 131 (“[A] confession obtained by compulsion must be excluded whatever may have been the character of the compulsion, and whether the compulsion was applied in a judicial proceeding or otherwise”).

2004See, e.g., Ziang Sung Wan v. United States (1924), 266 U.S. 1, 14-15 , 45 S.Ct. 1 , 69 L.Ed. 131 (“[A] confession obtained by compulsion must be excluded whatever may have been the character of the compulsion, and whether the compulsion was applied in a judicial proceeding or otherwise”).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Sage v. Gallagher neutral
ohioctapp · 2014
2 sentences

2021Richland No. 13 CA 64, 2014-Ohio-1598 . {¶24} Appellant specifically contends that while the trial court utilized the correct legal test to determine cohabitation, the trial court wrongly applied the facts to the test in this case.

2014We expressed our determination that " *** the overarching principle in such cases is that '[c]ohabitation contemplates a Coshocton County, Case No. 2013CA0030 10 relationship that approximates, or is the functional equivalent of, a marriage.' ” Id., citing Keeley v. Keeley, 12th Dist.

22014–2021
State v. Dehass green
ohio · 1967
2 sentences

2001Second, we are guided by the overarching principle that, whether the case is "civil or criminal, the weight to be given the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses are primarily for the trier of the facts." State v. DeHass (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 230 , 227 N.E.2d 212 , paragraph one of the syllabus.

2001Second, we are guided by the overarching principle that, whether the case is "civil or criminal, the weight to be given the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses are primarily for the trier of the facts." State v. DeHass (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 230 , 227 N.E.2d 212 , paragraph one of the syllabus.

21999–2001
State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State University green
ohio · 2000
1 sentence

2026Id. at 400 ; see R.C. 1333.61(D). {¶23} Mr. Gordon-Creed submitted answers to the trial court’s questions, which the trial court labeled a. through e. As to question a., Mr. Gordon-Creed submitted an answer with paragraphs numbered 1. through 7.

12026–2026
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. green
scotus · 1950
2 sentences

2017Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 , 70 S.Ct. 652 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950) (citations omitted); see Keisling v. Keisling, 92 S.W.3d 374, 377 (Tenn. 2002) (citations omitted).

2017Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 , 70 S.Ct. 652 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950) (citations omitted); see Keisling v. Keisling, 92 S.W.3d 374, 377 (Tenn. 2002) (citations omitted).

12017–2017
Hamad v. Hamad, 06ap-516 (5-10-2007) green
ohioctapp · 2007
1 sentence

2017No. 06AP-516, 2007-Ohio-2239 , 2007 WL 1377552 , ¶ 54. {¶ 17} Notwithstanding the overarching standard of review, previous decisions of this Court support the view that it is legitimate for an appellate court to review factual determinations of the trial court for manifest weight and sufficiency.

12017–2017
At&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion green
scotus · 2011
1 sentence

2016Regarding DRI’s third assignment of error, Appellees argue that if the arbitrability of DRI’s claims is an issue for the court, then the trial court properly found that DRI’s claims fall within the broad scope of the arbitration clause. {¶16} The FAA embodies a “liberal federal policy favoring arbitration,” and “reflects the overarching principle that arbitration is a matter of contract.” (Citation omitted.) AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 , 339 (2011); Am.

12016–2016
State v. Martin green
ohioctapp · 1983
2 sentences

2001Appellant has simply failed to meet his burden of establishing that the jury "lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that the conviction must be reversed and a new trial ordered. " State v. Martin , 20 Ohio App.3d at 172 , 485 N.E.2d at 717 .

2001Appellant has simply failed to meet his burden of establishing that the jury "lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that the conviction must be reversed and a new trial ordered. " State v. Martin , 20 Ohio App.3d at 172 , 485 N.E.2d at 717 .

12001–2001

Where else courts name it

CA 139 (1998–2026) TX 39 (1996–2026) NY 38 (1997–2026) MD 26 (1992–2026) NJ 25 (1983–2022) PA 20 (2003–2026) UT 19 (1951–2024) KS 19 (1998–2025) WA 17 (1997–2025) MO 17 (1985–2024) MI 16 (1997–2026) OR 15 (2003–2025) IA 13 (2003–2025) MA 13 (2001–2025) IL 12 (1993–2026) AZ 11 (2006–2015) LA 11 (1997–2024) OH 10 (1999–2026) NM 10 (2004–2025) DE 9 (2009–2022) NV 9 (2010–2022) WI 9 (2003–2022) IN 9 (2008–2019) CT 9 (1990–2019) FL 8 (1993–2019) OK 7 (1995–2016) NC 7 (2000–2020) VA 7 (2001–2021) WV 6 (1998–2022) GA 6 (2008–2017) KY 6 (2005–2025) MN 5 (1997–2017) CO 5 (2014–2025) MS 5 (2005–2018) TN 4 (2000–2019) RI 4 (2002–2022) SC 3 (2006–2022) ME 3 (1991–2023) AL 3 (2010–2017) AR 2 (2011–2019) NH 2 (2006–2020) AK 2 (2019–2025) HI 2 (2015–2015) DC 2 (2022–2022) NE 2 (2020–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check