record shows challenge (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

record shows challenge in North Carolina

16 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1884–2024 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Gibbsgreen
nc · 1993 · cited in 7 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1994–2024
2 sentences

2024Further, “where the record shows the challenge is supported by the prospective juror’s answers to the prosecutor’s and court’s questions, absent a showing that further questioning would have elicited different answers, the court does not err by refusing to permit the defendant to propound questions about the same matter.” State v. Gibbs, 335 N.C. 1, 35 (1993) (cleaned up).

2023Gibbs, 335 N.C. at 26 . “[W]here the record shows the challenge is supported by the prospective juror’s answers to the prosecutor’s and court’s questions, absent a showing that further questioning would have elicited different answers, the court does not err by refusing to permit the defendant to propound questions about the same matter.” Id. at 35 .

57
State v. Bardengreen
nc · 2002 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
2 sentences

2021See State v. Barden, 356 N.C. 316 , 381–82, 572 S.E.2d 108, 149 (2002) (declining to hold a delayed, incomplete, and ambiguous instruction was ineffective “because a jury is presumed to follow a court’s STATE V.

2021See State v. Barden, 356 N.C. 316 , 381–82, 572 S.E.2d 108, 149 (2002) (declining to hold a delayed, incomplete, and ambiguous instruction was ineffective “because a jury is presumed to follow a court’s STATE V.

22
State v. Hillgreen
nc · 1992 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1993–1996
2 sentences

1996State v. Hill, 331 N.C. 387, 403 , 417 S.E.2d 765, 772 (1992)[, cert. denied, 507 U.S. 924 , 113 S.Ct. 1293 , 122 L.Ed.2d 684 (1993)].

1996State v. Hill, 331 N.C. 387, 403 , 417 S.E.2d 765, 772 (1992)[, cert. denied, 507 U.S. 924 , 113 S.Ct. 1293 , 122 L.Ed.2d 684 (1993)].

22
State v. McPhailgreen
nc · 1991 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996“A criminal defendant will not be heard to complain of a jury instruction given in response to his own request.” State v. McPhail, 329 N.C. 636, 643 , 406 S.E.2d 591, 596 (1991); see also State v. Cook, 263 N.C. 730 , 140 S.E.2d 305 (1965); State v. Plowden, 65 N.C.

1996“A criminal defendant will not be heard to complain of a jury instruction given in response to his own request.” State v. McPhail, 329 N.C. 636, 643 , 406 S.E.2d 591, 596 (1991); see also State v. Cook, 263 N.C. 730 , 140 S.E.2d 305 (1965); State v. Plowden, 65 N.C.

11
State v. Cookgreen
nc · 1965 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996“A criminal defendant will not be heard to complain of a jury instruction given in response to his own request.” State v. McPhail, 329 N.C. 636, 643 , 406 S.E.2d 591, 596 (1991); see also State v. Cook, 263 N.C. 730 , 140 S.E.2d 305 (1965); State v. Plowden, 65 N.C.

1996“A criminal defendant will not be heard to complain of a jury instruction given in response to his own request.” State v. McPhail, 329 N.C. 636, 643 , 406 S.E.2d 591, 596 (1991); see also State v. Cook, 263 N.C. 730 , 140 S.E.2d 305 (1965); State v. Plowden, 65 N.C.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Benfield green
nc · 1965
2 sentences

2003In State v. Benfield, 264 N.C. 75 , 140 S.E.2d 706 (1965), the defendant was being retried for armed robbery.

2003In State v. Benfield, 264 N.C. 75 , 140 S.E.2d 706 (1965), the defendant was being retried for armed robbery.

12003–2003
Roe v. Louisiana Supreme Court green
scotus · 1994
1 sentence

1999However, “where the record shows the challenge is supported by the prospective juror’s *654 answers to the prosecutor’s and court’s questions, absent a showing that further questioning would have elicited different answers, the court does not err by refusing to permit the defendant to propound questions about the same matter.” State v. Gibbs, 335 N.C. 1, 35 , 436 S.E.2d 321, 340 (1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1246 , 129 L.

11999–1999
State v. Plowden green
ncctapp · 1983
1 sentence

1996“A criminal defendant will not be heard to complain of a jury instruction given in response to his own request.” State v. McPhail, 329 N.C. 636, 643 , 406 S.E.2d 591, 596 (1991); see also State v. Cook, 263 N.C. 730 , 140 S.E.2d 305 (1965); State v. Plowden, 65 N.C.

11996–1996
Hill v. North Carolina green
scotus · 1993
1 sentence

1996State v. Hill, 331 N.C. 387, 403 , 417 S.E.2d 765, 772 (1992)[, cert. denied, 507 U.S. 924 , 113 S.Ct. 1293 , 122 L.Ed.2d 684 (1993)].

11996–1996
Tran Van Khiem v. United States green
scotus · 1993
2 sentences

1996State v. Hill, 331 N.C. 387, 403 , 417 S.E.2d 765, 772 (1992)[, cert. denied, 507 U.S. 924 , 113 S.Ct. 1293 , 122 L.Ed.2d 684 (1993)].

1996State v. Hill, 331 N.C. 387, 403 , 417 S.E.2d 765, 772 (1992)[, cert. denied, 507 U.S. 924 , 122 L.

11996–1996
Kesner v. United States green
scotus · 1993
2 sentences

1996State v. Hill, 331 N.C. 387, 403 , 417 S.E.2d 765, 772 (1992)[, cert. denied, 507 U.S. 924 , 113 S.Ct. 1293 , 122 L.Ed.2d 684 (1993)].

1996State v. Hill, 331 N.C. 387, 403 , 417 S.E.2d 765, 772 (1992)[, cert. denied, 507 U.S. 924 , 122 L.

11996–1996
State v. Ward. neutral
nc · 1823
1 sentence

1987The court held the defendant waived his right to question the composition of the jury, by failing to object at the time of the court’s action: While the record shows an exception by the defendant to each of these actions of the court, it does not show any objection thereto interposed at the time. . . . ⅜ * * * [I]t has been settled in this State since as long ago as State v. Ward, 9 N.C. 443, that an irregularity in forming a jury is waived by silence of a party at the time of the court’s action. [[Image here]] * * * * ...

11987–1987
Witherspoon v. Illinois green
scotus · 1968
2 sentences

1975Both of the foregoing challenges for cause were properly sustained under the ruling of the Supreme'Court of the United States in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , 88 S.Ct. 1770 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 776 .

1975Both of the foregoing challenges for cause were properly sustained under the ruling of the Supreme'Court of the United States in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , 88 S.Ct. 1770 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 776 .

11975–1975
Weaver v. . Jones neutral
nc · 1880
1 sentence

1884Weaver v. Jones, 82 N. C., 440 .

11884–1884

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-2000 (9) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 8C-1 (7) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-17 (6) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1443 (6) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1212 (3) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-27 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 176 (1909–2026) CA 85 (1893–2026) IL 74 (1869–2026) NY 51 (1891–2022) MT 39 (1911–2023) GA 30 (1947–2025) FL 24 (1928–2020) PA 16 (1893–2020) MS 16 (1998–2024) NC 16 (1884–2024) WA 15 (1910–2022) AL 14 (1914–2025) LA 14 (1921–2017) CO 13 (1912–2025) MI 13 (1914–2021) OH 13 (1996–2025) OK 12 (1933–2023) MO 11 (1894–2013) MA 10 (1925–2018) IN 10 (1883–2012) WV 9 (1904–2014) KS 7 (1888–2021) MD 7 (1914–2026) ID 7 (1887–2020) NM 6 (1950–2023) CT 5 (1942–2015) SC 5 (1994–2012) NE 5 (1894–2021) WY 5 (2006–2025) MN 4 (1938–2012) TN 4 (2002–2024) AZ 3 (1998–2023) WI 3 (1967–2015) DE 3 (1986–2024) NJ 3 (1986–2021) ME 2 (2017–2017) AR 2 (1906–1919) VA 2 (1873–1993) IA 2 (2018–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check