record shows defense in Pennsylvania

1966The fact that he had never before represented a defendant in a murder trial does not justify a conclusion of incompetency: United States v. Helwig, 159 F. 2d 616 (1947).

1964The fact that he had never before represented a defendant in a murder trial does not justify a conclusion of incompetency: United States v. Helwig, 159 F. 2d 616 (1947).

2020Appellant’s Supplemental Brief at 30 (citing Commonwealth v. Foster, 17 A.3d 332 (Pa. 2011), for the proposition that “a plurality of [our] Supreme Court [] held that the defendant did not waive a challenge to his sentence based on an interpretation of a mandatory minimum statute”).

2019Court erred in denying Defendant's pre-trial motions to suppress defendant's statements made to police outside Defendant's residence on October 29, 2015 1: TheUnited States Supreme Court ruling in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), I requires that a person must make a knowing and intelligent waiver of his privilege against self- I! incrimination and right to counsei after being provided an adequate warning as to these rights · \ ) before he is subjected to custodial interrogation.

1984The record shows that the waiver colloquy was in accord with the standards set *28 forth in Commonwealth v. Williams, 454 Pa. 368 , 312 A.2d 597 (1973).

1984The record shows that the waiver colloquy was in accord with the standards set *28 forth in Commonwealth v. Williams, 454 Pa. 368 , 312 A.2d 597 (1973).

1983Thus, the record shows that defense counsel contended that there were "three continuances at which the Commonwealth was unprepared." Id.

1983Thus, the record shows that defense counsel contended that there were “three continuances at which the Commonwealth was unprepared.” Id.

1978The trial judge is granted broad discretion concerning decisions on the scope of cross-examination (Commonwealth v. Bailey, 450 Pa. 201 , 299 A.2d 298 (1973)) and no abuse of that discretion is apparent here.

1978The trial judge is granted broad discretion concerning decisions on the scope of cross-examination (Commonwealth v. Bailey, 450 Pa. 201 , 299 A.2d 298 (1973)) and no abuse of that discretion is apparent here.

1978Collateral estoppel is an integral part of the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 , 90 S.Ct. 1189 , 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970), and this appellant, by raising the issue of double jeopardy, necessarily raises the collateral estoppel aspects of the double jeopardy clause.

1978Collateral estoppel is an integral part of the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 , 90 S.Ct. 1189 , 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970), and this appellant, by raising the issue of double jeopardy, necessarily raises the collateral estoppel aspects of the double jeopardy clause.

1974Commonwealth v. Johnson, supra, Commonwealth v. Snyder, 427 Pa. 83, 102 , 233 A. 2d 530 (1967); Commonwealth v. Kravitz, 441 Pa. 79 , 269 A. 2d 912 (1970).

1974Commonwealth v. Johnson, supra, Commonwealth v. Snyder, 427 Pa. 83, 102 , 233 A. 2d 530 (1967); Commonwealth v. Kravitz, 441 Pa. 79 , 269 A. 2d 912 (1970).

1974Commonwealth v. Johnson, supra, Commonwealth v. Snyder, 427 Pa. 83, 102 , 233 A. 2d 530 (1967); Commonwealth v. Kravitz, 441 Pa. 79 , 269 A. 2d 912 (1970).

1974Commonwealth v. Johnson, supra, Commonwealth v. Snyder, 427 Pa. 83, 102 , 233 A. 2d 530 (1967); Commonwealth v. Kravitz, 441 Pa. 79 , 269 A. 2d 912 (1970).

1969As we have often said, that failure will not alone vitiate a plea, particularly in cases where pleas were taken before “judges and lawyers were made aware of the importance of the on-the-record colloquy.” See n.4, Commonwealth v. Johnson, supra, pp. 529-530; Commonwealth v. Walker, 433 Pa. 124 , 249 A. 2d 283 (1969); Commonwealth v. Cushnie, 433 Pa. 131 , 249 A. 2d 290 (1969).

1969As we have often said, that failure will not alone vitiate a plea, particularly in cases where pleas were taken before “judges and lawyers were made aware of the importance of the on-the-record colloquy.” See n.4, Commonwealth v. Johnson, supra, pp. 529-530; Commonwealth v. Walker, 433 Pa. 124 , 249 A. 2d 283 (1969); Commonwealth v. Cushnie, 433 Pa. 131 , 249 A. 2d 290 (1969).

1969As we have often said, that failure will not alone vitiate a plea, particularly in cases where pleas were taken before “judges and lawyers were made aware of the importance of the on-the-record colloquy.” See n.4, Commonwealth v. Johnson, supra, pp. 529-530; Commonwealth v. Walker, 433 Pa. 124 , 249 A. 2d 283 (1969); Commonwealth v. Cushnie, 433 Pa. 131 , 249 A. 2d 290 (1969).

1969As we have often said, that failure will not alone vitiate a plea, particularly in cases where pleas were taken before “judges and lawyers were made aware of the importance of the on-the-record colloquy.” See n.4, Commonwealth v. Johnson, supra, pp. 529-530; Commonwealth v. Walker, 433 Pa. 124 , 249 A. 2d 283 (1969); Commonwealth v. Cushnie, 433 Pa. 131 , 249 A. 2d 290 (1969).

1937See also, as to acquiescence by the parties: Curran’s Estate, 312 Pa. 416 ; Macfarlane’s Estate, 317 Pa. 377 .

1937See also, as to acquiescence by the parties: Curran’s Estate, 312 Pa. 416 ; Macfarlane’s Estate, 317 Pa. 377 .

1905These decisions do not apply to a case where the record shows error of law, as for example an apportionment of the costs between the parties in a case where by law the costs follow the verdict and judgment: Black’s Appeal, 106 Pa. 344 ; or where the bill as taxed contains items not authorized by law : Barnet v. Ihrie, 1 Rawle, 44 ; or where there is no law authorizing the imposition of costs upon either the successful or the unsuccessful parties to the litigation: Wayne Borough Incorporation, 12 Pa. Superior Ct. 372 ; see also, Grubbs’ Appeal, 82 Pa. 23, at p. 31 .

1905These decisions do not apply to a case where the record shows error of law, as for example an apportionment of the costs between the parties in a case where by law the costs follow the verdict and judgment: Black’s Appeal, 106 Pa. 344 ; or where the bill as taxed contains items not authorized by law : Barnet v. Ihrie, 1 Rawle, 44 ; or where there is no law authorizing the imposition of costs upon either the successful or the unsuccessful parties to the litigation: Wayne Borough Incorporation, 12 Pa. Superior Ct. 372 ; see also, Grubbs’ Appeal, 82 Pa. 23, at p. 31 .

1905These decisions do not apply to a case where the record shows error of law, as for example an apportionment of the costs between the parties in a case where by law the costs follow the verdict and judgment: Black’s Appeal, 106 Pa. 344 ; or where the bill as taxed contains items not authorized by law : Barnet v. Ihrie, 1 Rawle, 44 ; or where there is no law authorizing the imposition of costs upon either the successful or the unsuccessful parties to the litigation: Wayne Borough Incorporation, 12 Pa. Superior Ct. 372 ; see also, Grubbs’ Appeal, 82 Pa. 23, at p. 31 .

1893As was said in Building and Loan Association v. McCombs, 92 Pa. 364 , “ this court is bound to disregard an assignment of error under the act of April 18,1874, unless the record shows an exception was taken.” The act provides that “ plaintiff may except to such decision and take a writ of error to the Supreme Court.” When a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence is discharged in open court, in presence of the plaintiff’s counsel, then is the proper time to except and request the court to seal a bill.