15 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1965–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hollisgreen2 sentences2021The proper inquiry is not whether a guilty verdict would surely have been rendered in a trial without the error, but instead whether the guilty verdict rendered in the trial “was surely unattributable to error.” State v. Hollis, 342 S.W.3d 43, 52 (Tenn. Crim. 2014Consequently, the proper inquiry is not whether a guilty verdict surely would have been rendered in a trial without the error but “‘whether the guilty verdict actually rendered in this trial was surely unattributable to error.’” Hollis, 342 S.W.3d at 52 (quoting Dinwiddie, 2010 WL 2889098 , at *11). | 3 | 4 |
State v. Binettegreen2 sentences2002State v. Binette, 33 S.W.3d 215, 217 (Tenn. 2000). 2002State v. Binette, 33 S.W.3d 215, 217 (Tenn. 2000). | 2 | 2 |
Gordon v. Greenview Hospital, Inc.green1 sentence2021Turner v. Turner, 473 S.W.3d 257, 268 (Tenn. 2015) (citing Gordon v. Greenview Hosp., Inc., 300 S.W.3d 635, 645 (Tenn. 2009)); see also Amresco Independence Funding, LLC v. Renegade Mountain Golf Club, LLC, No. E2014-01160-COA-R3-CV, 2015 WL 1517921 , at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2015) (noting that “sufficiency of service of process, is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo by this Court without a presumption of correctness.”) (citing State ex rel. | 1 | 1 |
State ex rel. Barger v. City of Huntsvillegreen1 sentence2021Barger v. City of Huntsville, 63 S.W.3d 397, 398-99 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001)). | 1 | 1 |
Kevin Turner v. Stephanie D. Turnergreen1 sentence2021Turner v. Turner, 473 S.W.3d 257, 268 (Tenn. 2015) (citing Gordon v. Greenview Hosp., Inc., 300 S.W.3d 635, 645 (Tenn. 2009)); see also Amresco Independence Funding, LLC v. Renegade Mountain Golf Club, LLC, No. E2014-01160-COA-R3-CV, 2015 WL 1517921 , at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2015) (noting that “sufficiency of service of process, is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo by this Court without a presumption of correctness.”) (citing State ex rel. | 1 | 1 |
Hedgpeth v. Pulidogreen1 sentence2014The court ultimately concluded, “[T]he proof of premeditation, although sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict, was not overwhelming, and we are simply unable to conclude that the erroneous jury instruction did not have a ‘substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict.’” Id. at 52 (quoting Hedgepeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. 57, 58 (2008)). | 1 | 1 |
Sullivan v. Louisianagreen2 sentences2014Consequently, this court held that the appropriate inquiry was not whether a guilty verdict surely would have been rendered in a trial without the error but “‘whether the guilty verdict actually rendered in this trial was surely unattributable to error.’” Id. at 52 (quoting Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 279 (1993)). 2014The court ultimately concluded, “[T]he proof of premeditation, although sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict, was not overwhelming, and we are simply unable to conclude that the erroneous jury instruction did not have a ‘substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict.’” Id. at 52 (quoting Hedgepeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. 57, 58 (2008)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rainesgreen1 sentence2008See id. at app. 521. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Manngreen2 sentences2008In State v. Mann, 959 S.W.2d 503 (Tenn.1997), this Court adopted without analysis the Court of Criminal Appeals’ holding to that effect. 2008See id. at 521 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Union Carbide Corp. v. Huddleston
green
2 sentences2001Union Carbide Corp. v. Huddleston, 854 S.W.2d 87 (Tenn. 1993). 2001Union Carbide Corp. v. Huddleston, 854 S.W.2d 87 (Tenn.1993). | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Fletcher v. State
green
1 sentence2006Fletcher, 951 S.W.2d at 380-81 ; see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-117 (a)(1-4). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Realty Shop, Inc. v. RR Westminster Holding, Inc.
green
1 sentence2000The meaning of a contract is a question of law, Realty Shop, Inc. v. RR Westminister Holding, Inc., 7 S.W.3d 581 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999), and a trial court’s interpretation is reviewed de novo in this court without the presumption of correctness that attaches to the lower court’s findings of fact under Rule 13(d), Tenn. R. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Nutt v. Champion International Corp.
green
1 sentence2000App. P. Nutt v. Champion International Corporation, 980 S.W.2d 365 (Tenn. 1998). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Dickens v. Shelby County, Tenn
green
2 sentences1965"As held in the original opinion of the court, the chancery court was without jurisdiction to entertain the suit, and the decree of the chancellor dismissing the same was without error." 178 Tenn. at 309 , 157 S.W.2d at 827 . 1965"As held in the original opinion of the court, the chancery court was without jurisdiction to entertain the suit, and the decree of the chancellor dismissing the same was without error." 178 Tenn. at 309 , 157 S.W.2d at 827 . | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.