6 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Concannongreen2 sentences1987Therefore * * * 'we will grant a new trial without inquiry into the degree of harm caused by the misconduct.’ ” Id. (quoting State v. Concannon, 457 A.2d 1350, 1353 (R.I. 1983)). 1985Therefore, as we stated in Concannon , — R.I. at-, 457 A.2d at 1353 , “we will grant a new trial without inquiry into the degree of harm caused by the misconduct.” Here, a fortio-ri, a new trial must be granted since the effect of the disclosure of this extremely crucial testimony was unquestionably prejudicial to defendant. | 1 | 3 |
State v. Verlaquegreen1 sentence1984Indeed, we have gone so far as to hold that where there has been deliberate failure to comply with Rule 16, “we will grant a new trial without inquiry into the degree of harm caused by the misconduct.” Id.; see also State v. Verlaque, 465 A.2d at 214 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bennett
green
2 sentences2003His decision to defer ruling pending the unfolding of evidence at the trial was without error.” Finally, we reject defendant’s assertion that State v. Bennett, 122 R.I. 276 , 405 A.2d 1181 (1979), and State v. Lariviere, 527 A.2d 648 (R.I.1987), are applicable to the instant appeal. 2003His decision to defer ruling pending the unfolding of evidence at the trial was without error.” Finally, we reject defendant’s assertion that State v. Bennett, 122 R.I. 276 , 405 A.2d 1181 (1979), and State v. Lariviere, 527 A.2d 648 (R.I.1987), are applicable to the instant appeal. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Lariviere
green
1 sentence2003His decision to defer ruling pending the unfolding of evidence at the trial was without error.” Finally, we reject defendant’s assertion that State v. Bennett, 122 R.I. 276 , 405 A.2d 1181 (1979), and State v. Lariviere, 527 A.2d 648 (R.I.1987), are applicable to the instant appeal. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Wyche
green
1 sentence1997In this context, the prosecution acts deliberately when it makes "a considered decision to suppress * * * for the purpose of obstructing" or where it fails "to disclose evidence whose high value to the defense could not have escaped * * * [its] attention." State v. Wyche , 518 A.2d 907 , 910 (R.I. 1986)(quoting United States v. Keogh , 391 F.2d 138 , 146-47 (2nd Cir. 1968)). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
United States v. James Vincent Keogh
green
1 sentence1997In this context, the prosecution acts deliberately when it makes "a considered decision to suppress * * * for the purpose of obstructing" or where it fails "to disclose evidence whose high value to the defense could not have escaped * * * [its] attention." State v. Wyche , 518 A.2d 907 , 910 (R.I. 1986)(quoting United States v. Keogh , 391 F.2d 138 , 146-47 (2nd Cir. 1968)). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Garcia
green
1 sentence1997In that case, the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that "[i]n cases where the nondisclosure has been deliberate, the basic precepts of due process have been violated, and this court will grant a new trial without an inquiry into the degree of harm produced by the misconduct." Id. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Heredia
green
1 sentence1987Therefore * * * 'we will grant a new trial without inquiry into the degree of harm caused by the misconduct.’ ” Id. (quoting State v. Concannon, 457 A.2d 1350, 1353 (R.I. 1983)). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.