14 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1925–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
White v. Stategreen2 sentences2025As a result, “[w]e have held that 5 a petition for retroactive first-offender treatment is properly rejected by a trial court without a hearing where an appellant fails to demonstrate that the prosecuting attorney consented to the filing of the petition.” Id. (affirming the dismissal of a defendant’s petition for retroactive first-offender treatment that he filed without first obtaining the prosecuting attorney’s consent); White v. State, 302 Ga. 69, 69-70 (1), (2) ( 805 SE2d 25 ) (2017) (holding that a petition for retroactive first-offender treatment is “properly denied without the need for 2025As a result, “[w]e have held that 5 a petition for retroactive first-offender treatment is properly rejected by a trial court without a hearing where an appellant fails to demonstrate that the prosecuting attorney consented to the filing of the petition.” Id. (affirming the dismissal of a defendant’s petition for retroactive first-offender treatment that he filed without first obtaining the prosecuting attorney’s consent); White v. State, 302 Ga. 69, 69-70 (1), (2) ( 805 SE2d 25 ) (2017) (holding that a petition for retroactive first-offender treatment is “properly denied without the need for | 2 | 2 |
Britt v. Conwaygreen2 sentences2020See also Britt v. Conway, 281 Ga. 189, 190 ( 637 SE2d 43 ) (2006) (“[W]here the petition and exhibits attached thereto disclose without contradiction that [a habeas] petition is without merit, it is not error to dismiss the same without a hearing.” (citation and punctuation omitted)). 2020See also Britt v. Conway, 281 Ga. 189, 190 ( 637 SE2d 43 ) (2006) (“[W]here the petition and exhibits attached thereto disclose without contradiction that [a habeas] petition is without merit, it is not error to dismiss the same without a hearing.” (citation and punctuation omitted)). | 2 | 2 |
Abdel-Samed v. Daileygreen2 sentences2014An appellate court’s “review of the grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.” Abdel-Samed v. Dailey, 294 Ga. 758, 760 (1) ( 755 SE2d 805 ) (2014). 2014An appellate court’s “review of the grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.” Abdel-Samed v. Dailey, 294 Ga. 758, 760 (1) ( 755 SE2d 805 ) (2014). | 2 | 2 |
Stewart v. Turnergreen2 sentences1999See OCGA § 9-11-12 (b) (6); Stewart v. Turner, 229 Ga. App. 119, 120 (1) ( 493 SE2d 251 ) (1997). 1999See OCGA § 9-11-12 (b) (6); Stewart v. Turner, 229 Ga. App. 119, 120 (1) ( 493 SE2d 251 ) (1997). | 1 | 1 |
King v. Kinggreen2 sentences1980Code Ann. § 38-639; see King v. King, 238 Ga. 268 ( 232 SE2d 549 ) (1977). 1980Code Ann. § 38-639; see King v. King, 238 Ga. 268 ( 232 SE2d 549 ) (1977). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Fletcher
green
2 sentences2026Fletcher, 252 Ga. at 498 . 2026Fletcher, 252 Ga. at 498 . | 2 | 2026–2026 |
Bass v. Ault
green
2 sentences2006Although it appears that the habeas court did not conduct a hearing, “where the petition and exhibits attached thereto disclose without contradiction that the petition is without merit, it is not error to dismiss the same without a hearing.” Bass v. Ault, 229 Ga. 309 -310 ( 191 SE2d 73 ) (1972). 2006Although it appears that the habeas court did not conduct a hearing, “where the petition and exhibits attached thereto disclose without contradiction that the petition is without merit, it is not error to dismiss the same without a hearing.” Bass v. Ault, 229 Ga. 309 -310 ( 191 SE2d 73 ) (1972). | 2 | 1980–2006 |
Sumrall v. State
green
1 sentence2025As a result, “[w]e have held that 5 a petition for retroactive first-offender treatment is properly rejected by a trial court without a hearing where an appellant fails to demonstrate that the prosecuting attorney consented to the filing of the petition.” Id. (affirming the dismissal of a defendant’s petition for retroactive first-offender treatment that he filed without first obtaining the prosecuting attorney’s consent); White v. State, 302 Ga. 69, 69-70 (1), (2) ( 805 SE2d 25 ) (2017) (holding that a petition for retroactive first-offender treatment is “properly denied without the need for | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Dodd v. Dodd
green
2 sentences1974Since the wife in this case contended that she was entitled to a divorce on the ground that the marriage was irretrievably broken and the court granted a divorce on this ground, she can not now complain because "one cannot complain of a judgment, order, or ruling that his own procedure or conduct procured or aided in causing." *256 Henley v. Henley, 217 Ga. 612 ( 124 SE2d 86 ); Dodd v. Dodd, 224 Ga. 746 ( 164 SE2d 726 ); Imperial Massage &c. 1974Since the wife in this case contended that she was entitled to a divorce on the ground that the marriage was irretrievably broken and the court granted a divorce on this ground, she can not now complain because "one cannot complain of a judgment, order, or ruling that his own procedure or conduct procured or aided in causing." *256 Henley v. Henley, 217 Ga. 612 ( 124 SE2d 86 ); Dodd v. Dodd, 224 Ga. 746 ( 164 SE2d 726 ); Imperial Massage &c. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Henley v. Henley
green
2 sentences1974Since the wife in this case contended that she was entitled to a divorce on the ground that the marriage was irretrievably broken and the court granted a divorce on this ground, she can not now complain because "one cannot complain of a judgment, order, or ruling that his own procedure or conduct procured or aided in causing." *256 Henley v. Henley, 217 Ga. 612 ( 124 SE2d 86 ); Dodd v. Dodd, 224 Ga. 746 ( 164 SE2d 726 ); Imperial Massage &c. 1974Since the wife in this case contended that she was entitled to a divorce on the ground that the marriage was irretrievably broken and the court granted a divorce on this ground, she can not now complain because "one cannot complain of a judgment, order, or ruling that his own procedure or conduct procured or aided in causing." *256 Henley v. Henley, 217 Ga. 612 ( 124 SE2d 86 ); Dodd v. Dodd, 224 Ga. 746 ( 164 SE2d 726 ); Imperial Massage &c. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Wilkins, Neely & Jones v. Gibson
green
1 sentence1925The judgment rendered by the court was without error, because, “To entitle one creditor to be subrogated to the rights of another, as a general rule the former must have satisfied in full the demand of the latter, so as to relieve him from trouble, expense, and risk.” Wilkins v. Gibson, supra; 25 R. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.