Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1959–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Blecha v. Peoplegreen2 sentences2013See id. (citing Blecha v. People, 962 P.2d 931, 942 (Colo. 1998)). 118 At trial, the alternative source evidence was central to the defense and therefore pivotal to the jury's resolution of defendant's case. 2006See Sullivan, 508 U.S. at 279 , 113 S.Ct. 2078 . *134 We are guided in our analysis by various factors “including the importance of the witness’ testimony to the prosecution’s case, whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of corroborating or contradictory evidence on the material points of the witness’ testimony, the extent of the cross-examination otherwise permitted, and the overall strength of the prosecution’s case.” Blecha, 962 P.2d at 942 (citing Merritt v. People, 842 P.2d 162 (Colo.1992)). | 2 | 3 |
Kendrick v. Pippingreen2 sentences2024Kendrick , 252 P.3d at 1063 . 2024Kendrick , 252 P.3d at 1063. | 1 | 1 |
Aldrich v. DIST. CT. OF EIGHTEENTH JUD. DIST.green2 sentences2015Aldrich, 714 P2d at 1323. 'To the extent the trial court did not consider the allegations set forth in the affidavit when it denied defendant's motion for a new trial without a hearing, we conclude that it erred. 2015Cf. Destination Travel, Inc. v. McElhanon, 799 P.2d 454, 457 (Colo.App.1990) ("[The statements attributed to the jurors in: the affidavits" of defendant's attorney "are admissible ... on the question of whether the Jury discussed or considered matters beyond the evidence admitted at trial." (clung Aldrich, 714 P.2d at 1323)). | 1 | 1 |
Destination Travel, Inc. v. McElhanongreen1 sentence2015Cf. Destination Travel, Inc. v. McElhanon, 799 P.2d 454, 457 (Colo.App.1990) ("[The statements attributed to the jurors in: the affidavits" of defendant's attorney "are admissible ... on the question of whether the Jury discussed or considered matters beyond the evidence admitted at trial." (clung Aldrich, 714 P.2d at 1323)). | 1 | 1 |
Bernal v. Peoplegreen2 sentences2013Under this standard, reversal is required unless we are "confident beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the guilty verdict." Bernal, 44 P.3d at 200 . - This test is not whether a guilty verdict would surely have been rendered in a trial without the error, but rather whether the guilty verdict in this trial was surely unattributable to the error. 2013See id. (citing Blecha v. People, 962 P.2d 931, 942 (Colo. 1998)). 118 At trial, the alternative source evidence was central to the defense and therefore pivotal to the jury's resolution of defendant's case. | 1 | 1 |
Sullivan v. Louisianagreen2 sentences2006See Sullivan, 508 U.S. at 279 , 113 S.Ct. 2078 . *134 We are guided in our analysis by various factors “including the importance of the witness’ testimony to the prosecution’s case, whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of corroborating or contradictory evidence on the material points of the witness’ testimony, the extent of the cross-examination otherwise permitted, and the overall strength of the prosecution’s case.” Blecha, 962 P.2d at 942 (citing Merritt v. People, 842 P.2d 162 (Colo.1992)). 2006See Sullivan, 508 U.S. at 279 , 113 S.Ct. 2078 . *134 We are guided in our analysis by various factors “including the importance of the witness’ testimony to the prosecution’s case, whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of corroborating or contradictory evidence on the material points of the witness’ testimony, the extent of the cross-examination otherwise permitted, and the overall strength of the prosecution’s case.” Blecha, 962 P.2d at 942 (citing Merritt v. People, 842 P.2d 162 (Colo.1992)). | 1 | 1 |
Merritt v. Peoplegreen1 sentence2006See Sullivan, 508 U.S. at 279 , 113 S.Ct. 2078 . *134 We are guided in our analysis by various factors “including the importance of the witness’ testimony to the prosecution’s case, whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of corroborating or contradictory evidence on the material points of the witness’ testimony, the extent of the cross-examination otherwise permitted, and the overall strength of the prosecution’s case.” Blecha, 962 P.2d at 942 (citing Merritt v. People, 842 P.2d 162 (Colo.1992)). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Miltongreen1 sentence1996See People v. Milton, 732 P.2d 1199 (Colo.1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
De Baca v. District Court
green
2 sentences1969We affirmed the denial in DeBaca v. District Court, 163 Colo. 516 , 431 P.2d 763 . 1969We affirmed the denial in DeBaca v. District Court, 163 Colo. 516 , 431 P.2d 763 . | 2 | 1969–1969 |
Raile v. People
green
1 sentence2016The question, then, is not "whether a guilty verdict would have been rendered in a trial without the error, but what effect the error had on this verdict." Raile v. People , 148 P.3d 126 , 133 (Colo. 2006). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Harris
green
1 sentence2005Bernal v. People, supra; People v. Harris, 43 P.3d 221 (Colo.2002); Blecha v. People, 962 P.2d 931 (Colo.1998). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
People v. Scheidt
green
2 sentences1996In addition, citing People v. Scheldt, 187 Colo. 20 , 528 P.2d 232 (1974), defendant argues that his motion for a new trial should be treated as a Crim. 1996In addition, citing People v. Scheldt, 187 Colo. 20 , 528 P.2d 232 (1974), defendant argues that his motion for a new trial should be treated as a Crim. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Bostic v. Bryan
neutral
1 sentence1959Also, it has been held that the reviewing court has no power to enter a judgment on the merits of the controversy, nor to direct the respondent to enter any particular order or judgment. * * In Ruth v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 83 So. (2d) 796 (Fla.), the court said: “It also follows that appellee’s contention that the earlier certiorari proceedings referred to ‘was actually an appeal from a final judgment’ and that the denial of the requested writ amounted to an affirmance thereof by this court is without legal efficacy. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.