14 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1978–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carroll v. President & Commissioners of Princess Annegreen2 sentences2005Carroll v. President & Comm’rs of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175, 184 , 89 S.Ct. 347 , 21 L.Ed.2d 325 (1968) (“But this procedural right [to a hearing on not more than two days’ notice] does not overcome the infirmity in the absence of a showing of justification for the ex parte nature of the proceedings.”). 2005Carroll v. President & Comm’rs of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175, 184 , 89 S.Ct. 347 , 21 L.Ed.2d 325 (1968) (“But this procedural right [to a hearing on not more than two days’ notice] does not overcome the infirmity in the absence of a showing of justification for the ex parte nature of the proceedings.”). | 2 | 2 |
Ex Parte Brooksgreen2 sentences2004Although this Court did, in fact, determine that the prosecutor's remarks were improper, we determined that no error occurred based upon the court's prompt instruction to the jury that the remark was not to be considered. 599 So.2d at 1269 (citing Ex parte Brooks, 562 So.2d 604, 605 (Ala.1990)). 2002Although this Court did, in fact, determine that the prosecutor’s remarks were improper, we determined that no error occurred based upon the court’s prompt instruction to the jury that the remark was not to -be considered. 599 So.2d at 1269 (citing Ex parte Brooks, 562 So.2d 604, 605 (Ala.1990)). | 2 | 2 |
Richardson v. Stategreen1 sentence1983See Richardson v. State , 374 So.2d 433 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979). | 1 | 1 |
Frazier v. Stategreen2 sentences1983See Frazier v. State, 56 Ala.App. 166 , 320 So.2d 99 (1975). 1983See Frazier v. State, 56 Ala.App. 166 , 320 So.2d 99 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
Barbee v. Stategreen1 sentence1982See Barbee v. State , 395 So.2d 1128 (Ala.Cr.App. 1981). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Carroll v. State
green
2 sentences2004Although this Court did, in fact, determine that the prosecutor's remarks were improper, we determined that no error occurred based upon the court's prompt instruction to the jury that the remark was not to be considered. 599 So.2d at 1269 (citing Ex parte Brooks, 562 So.2d 604, 605 (Ala.1990)). 2002Although this Court did, in fact, determine that the prosecutor’s remarks were improper, we determined that no error occurred based upon the court’s prompt instruction to the jury that the remark was not to -be considered. 599 So.2d at 1269 (citing Ex parte Brooks, 562 So.2d 604, 605 (Ala.1990)). | 2 | 2002–2004 |
Allen v. State
green
2 sentences1989Allen v. State , 462 So.2d 1031 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984). 1989Allen v. State, 462 So.2d 1031 (Ala.Cr.App.1984). | 2 | 1989–1989 |
United States v. Montalvo-Murillo
green
1 sentence2025In Montalvo-Murillo, the United States Supreme Court considered "whether failure to comply with the prompt hearing provision of the [Bail Reform] Act [of 1984] requires the release of a person who is a flight risk or a danger to other persons or the community." 495 U.S. at 713 . 3 There, 3The prompt-hearing provision of the Bail Reform Act of 1984 is nearly identical to § 15-13-3(b)(3), Ala. Code 1975, which provides that a pretrial detention hearing be held "immediately upon the defendant's first appearance before the court, unless the prosecuting attorney or the defendant requests a continua | 1 | 2025–2025 |
McMillian v. State
green
1 sentence1997McMillian v. State , 594 So.2d 1253 , 1267-68 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Ex Parte Nix
green
1 sentence1984"Where the trial court immediately charges the jury to disregard the prosecutor's improper remarks, there is a prima facie presumption against error." Nix v. State , 370 So.2d 1115 , 1117 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 370 So.2d 1119 (Ala. 1979). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Nix v. State
green
1 sentence1984"Where the trial court immediately charges the jury to disregard the prosecutor's improper remarks, there is a prima facie presumption against error." Nix v. State , 370 So.2d 1115 , 1117 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 370 So.2d 1119 (Ala. 1979). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Wyatt v. Falhsing
green
1 sentence1981In Wyatt v. Falhsing, supra , the following was stated by this court: "A prompt hearing should be held as to whether the Act requires that the sister state's custody judgment be recognized and enforced. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Tillis v. State
green
2 sentences1978Smith v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 342 So.2d 466 (1977); Tillis v. State, 292 Ala. 521 , 296 So.2d 892 (1974). 1978Smith v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 342 So.2d 466 (1977); Tillis v. State, 292 Ala. 521 , 296 So.2d 892 (1974). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Smith v. State
neutral
1 sentence1978Smith v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 342 So.2d 466 (1977); Tillis v. State, 292 Ala. 521 , 296 So.2d 892 (1974). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.