Appellees claim in Arkansas

2025Ctr., 262 Ark. 587, 589 , 559 S.W.2d 159 (1977) (finding that the appellant was denied due process of law when the court prematurely awarded a judgment to the appellees at the hearing on his motion to compel).

2025Ctr., 262 Ark. 587, 589 , 559 S.W.2d 159 (1977) (finding that the appellant was denied due process of law when the court prematurely awarded a judgment to the appellees at the hearing on his motion to compel).

2019E.g. , Raymond v. Raymond , 343 Ark. 480 , 485, 36 S.W.3d 733 , 735 (2001) ; see also Zanone Props. , supra ; Kirchoff , supra. Here, the circuit court's order granted the Appellees' motion to dismiss and designated the dismissal as a strike under Ark.

2019E.g. , Raymond v. Raymond , 343 Ark. 480 , 485, 36 S.W.3d 733 , 735 (2001) ; see also Zanone Props. , supra ; Kirchoff , supra. Here, the circuit court's order granted the Appellees' motion to dismiss and designated the dismissal as a strike under Ark.

2017Reversed and remanded; motion to strike denied. 3 Appellees’ motion to strike a portion of appellants’ reply brief on this subject is denied. 8 Cite as 2017 Ark.

2014Id.

2014Id.

1999P. 52(a) and Clark v. National Bank of Commerce, 304 Ark. 352 , 802 S.W.2d 452 (1991), the appellees claim that the standard of review is clearly erroneous.

1999P. 52(a) and Clark v. National Bank of Commerce, 304 Ark. 352 , 802 S.W.2d 452 (1991), the appellees claim that the standard of review is clearly erroneous.

1980Hirsch v. Perkins, 211 Ark. 388 , 200 S.W. 2d 796 (1947); Crawley v. Neal, supra. Conclusion.

1980Hirsch v. Perkins, 211 Ark. 388 , 200 S.W. 2d 796 (1947); Crawley v. Neal, supra. Conclusion.

1979Norman v. Roberts, 29 Ark. 365 (1874); and Plummer v. Reeves, 83 Ark. 10 , 102 S.W. 376 (1907).

1979Norman v. Roberts, 29 Ark. 365 (1874); and Plummer v. Reeves, 83 Ark. 10 , 102 S.W. 376 (1907).

1979Norman v. Roberts, 29 Ark. 365 (1874); and Plummer v. Reeves, 83 Ark. 10 , 102 S.W. 376 (1907).

1975Belyeu v. Hudson, 179 Ark. 657 , 17 S.W. 2d 865 (1929); Chandler v. Gaines-Ferguson Realty Co., 145 Ark. 262 , 224 S.W. 484 (1920).

1975Belyeu v. Hudson, 179 Ark. 657 , 17 S.W. 2d 865 (1929); Chandler v. Gaines-Ferguson Realty Co., 145 Ark. 262 , 224 S.W. 484 (1920).

1975Belyeu v. Hudson, 179 Ark. 657 , 17 S.W. 2d 865 (1929); Chandler v. Gaines-Ferguson Realty Co., 145 Ark. 262 , 224 S.W. 484 (1920).

1975Belyeu v. Hudson, 179 Ark. 657 , 17 S.W. 2d 865 (1929); Chandler v. Gaines-Ferguson Realty Co., 145 Ark. 262 , 224 S.W. 484 (1920).

1966The procedure followed was approved by ns in Norfleet v. Norfleet, 233 Ark. 751 , 268 S. W. 2d 387 .

1959(Mueller v. Light, 92 Ark. 522 , 123 S. W. 646 , 31 L.

1959(Mueller v. Light, 92 Ark. 522 , 123 S. W. 646 , 31 L.

1933The facts out of which this litigation arose are fully stated in Milsap v. Holland, 184 Ark. 996 , 44 S. W. (2d) 662 , and from the opinion it will be seen that on appeal to the circuit court that court found the facts and law in favor of the remonstrants and adjudged that the petition for consolidation be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

1933The facts out of which this litigation arose are fully stated in Milsap v. Holland, 184 Ark. 996 , 44 S. W. (2d) 662 , and from the opinion it will be seen that on appeal to the circuit court that court found the facts and law in favor of the remonstrants and adjudged that the petition for consolidation be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

1915In the recent case of Morgan Engineering Company v. Cache River Drainage District, 115 Ark. 437 , 172 S. W. 1020 , we said: “It is well settled under our Constitution that the Legislature may not pass an act impairing the obligation of a contract. ’ ’ That was a case where a drainage .district had. been abolished, and the court was passing upon the question of the allowance of the ’claims of an engineering company for the preliminary expenses of surveying, the filing of plans, etc. The appellees claim under the act, and the burden was upon them to show that their claims were valid.

1915In the recent case of Morgan Engineering Company v. Cache River Drainage District, 115 Ark. 437 , 172 S. W. 1020 , we said: “It is well settled under our Constitution that the Legislature may not pass an act impairing the obligation of a contract. ’ ’ That was a case where a drainage .district had. been abolished, and the court was passing upon the question of the allowance of the ’claims of an engineering company for the preliminary expenses of surveying, the filing of plans, etc. The appellees claim under the act, and the burden was upon them to show that their claims were valid.

1898It was decided by this court in Percifull v. Platt, supra, that if a partnership name contained the name of one partner only, a conveyance to the partners by their firm title would vest the legal title in the one partner whose name appeared in the firm name, and that if the deed be to a partnership name, which includes the name of no party, it passes nothing at law.