9 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1925–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mischke v. Mischkegreen2 sentences1997This court ultimately held that the transfers made by Jerome under the durable power of attorney were void ab initio and that the appellees were accountable to Stanley’s estate not only for all of the property originally transferred to them, but also for any profits that they have made on account of receiving the property or that a reasonably prudent person would have realized from use, or for income from the fair market value of the property, whichever is greater. *443 Mischke v. Mischke, 247 Neb. 752, 760 , 530 N.W.2d 235, 241 (1995). 1997This court ultimately held that the transfers made by Jerome under the durable power of attorney were void ab initio and that the appellees were accountable to Stanley’s estate not only for all of the property originally transferred to them, but also for any profits that they have made on account of receiving the property or that a reasonably prudent person would have realized from use, or for income from the fair market value of the property, whichever is greater. *443 Mischke v. Mischke, 247 Neb. 752, 760 , 530 N.W.2d 235, 241 (1995). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Heck v. Humphrey
green
2 sentences2019In their cross-appeal, the appellees claim that although they agree with the judgment as entered, because Maloley was convicted for trespass and these convictions have not been reversed, declared invalid, or expunged, his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising as a consequence of these convictions are not cognizable under the rule articulated in Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 , 114 S. Ct. 2364 , 129 L. 2019In their cross-appeal, the appellees claim that although they agree with the judgment as entered, because Maloley was convicted for trespass and these convictions have not been reversed, declared invalid, or expunged, his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising as a consequence of these convictions are not cognizable under the rule articulated in Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 , 114 S. Ct. 2364 , 129 L. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Gonzales v. Nebraska Pediatric Practice
green
2 sentences2019Pavkovic and Chatterjee in support of Appellees’ motion for summary judgment, and (3) granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment. - 784 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports GONZALES v. NEBRASKA PEDIATRIC PRACTICE Cite as 26 Neb. 2019Therefore, we reverse the court’s order on Appellees’ motion for summary judgment and remand the mat- ter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. - 799 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports GONZALES v. NEBRASKA PEDIATRIC PRACTICE Cite as 26 Neb. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Chaney v. Evnen
green
2 sentences2022Chaney v. Evnen, 307 Neb. 512 , 949 N.W.2d 761 (2020). (a) Statute of Frauds Beekman first contends that the district court erred when it granted the Appellees’ motion to dismiss his contract claim for failure to state a claim because his claim violated the statute of frauds. 2022Chaney v. Evnen, 307 Neb. 512 , 949 N.W.2d 761 (2020). (a) Statute of Frauds Beekman first contends that the district court erred when it granted the Appellees’ motion to dismiss his contract claim for failure to state a claim because his claim violated the statute of frauds. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Kaiser v. Allstate Indemnity Co.
green
2 sentences2021Kaiser v. Allstate Indemnity Co., 307 Neb. 562 , 949 N.W.2d 787 (2020). 2021Kaiser v. Allstate Indemnity Co., 307 Neb. 562 , 949 N.W.2d 787 (2020). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Ewers v. Saunders County
green
1 sentence2018As the parties - 956 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 298 Nebraska R eports EWERS v. SAUNDERS COUNTY Cite as 298 Neb. 944 moving for summary judgment, Appellees had the burden to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and to produce sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Anderson v. Griswold
neutral
1 sentence1925Anderson v. Griswold, 87 Neb. 578 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.