Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pye v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See Pye v. State , 274 Ga. 839 , 839-840 (1), 561 S.E.2d 109 (2002). 2019See Pye v. State , 274 Ga. 839 , 839-840 (1), 561 S.E.2d 109 (2002). | 2 | 2 |
Jackson v. Virginiared2 sentences2010See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Reese v. State, 270 Ga. App. 522, 523 ( 607 SE2d 165 ) (2004). 2 See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 The trial court granted Bell’s motion to suppress his refusal to submit to a breath test. | 1 | 3 |
Usher v. Stategreen2 sentences2025At the motion for new trial hearing, the trial court clerk testified that letters were sent to prospective trial jurors who were 7 OCGA § 15-12-66.1 provides that “[w]hen from challenge or from any other cause there are not a sufficient number of persons in attendance to complete the empaneling of grand jurors, the presiding judge shall order the clerk to choose at random from the names of persons summoned as trial jurors a sufficient number of prospective grand jurors necessary to complete the grand jury.” 8 See Usher v. State, 258 Ga. App. 459, 464 (2) ( 574 SE2d 580 ) (2002) (“[T]he challen 2025At the motion for new trial hearing, the trial court clerk testified that letters were sent to prospective trial jurors who were 7 OCGA § 15-12-66.1 provides that “[w]hen from challenge or from any other cause there are not a sufficient number of persons in attendance to complete the empaneling of grand jurors, the presiding judge shall order the clerk to choose at random from the names of persons summoned as trial jurors a sufficient number of prospective grand jurors necessary to complete the grand jury.” 8 See Usher v. State, 258 Ga. App. 459, 464 (2) ( 574 SE2d 580 ) (2002) (“[T]he challen | 1 | 1 |
Terrell v. Stategreen2 sentences2025At the motion for new trial hearing, the trial court clerk testified that letters were sent to prospective trial jurors who were 7 OCGA § 15-12-66.1 provides that “[w]hen from challenge or from any other cause there are not a sufficient number of persons in attendance to complete the empaneling of grand jurors, the presiding judge shall order the clerk to choose at random from the names of persons summoned as trial jurors a sufficient number of prospective grand jurors necessary to complete the grand jury.” 8 See Usher v. State, 258 Ga. App. 459, 464 (2) ( 574 SE2d 580 ) (2002) (“[T]he challen 2025At the motion for new trial hearing, the trial court clerk testified that letters were sent to prospective trial jurors who were 7 OCGA § 15-12-66.1 provides that “[w]hen from challenge or from any other cause there are not a sufficient number of persons in attendance to complete the empaneling of grand jurors, the presiding judge shall order the clerk to choose at random from the names of persons summoned as trial jurors a sufficient number of prospective grand jurors necessary to complete the grand jury.” 8 See Usher v. State, 258 Ga. App. 459, 464 (2) ( 574 SE2d 580 ) (2002) (“[T]he challen | 1 | 1 |
Majeed v. Randallgreen2 sentences2023Accord 5 See supra note 2. 17 Majeed v. Randall, 279 Ga. App. 679, 681 (2) ( 632 SE2d 413 ) (2006) (concluding that “the grant of defendants’ motions to dismiss terminated the action and obviated the need for a timely answer”). 2023Accord 5 See supra note 2. 17 Majeed v. Randall, 279 Ga. App. 679, 681 (2) ( 632 SE2d 413 ) (2006) (concluding that “the grant of defendants’ motions to dismiss terminated the action and obviated the need for a timely answer”). | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Stategreen1 sentence2021See Wilson, supra, 318 8 Ga. App. at 95 (1) (c) (i) (holding that the indictment charging the defendant with aggravated assault on a peace officer was sufficient to withstand a general demurrer where the defendant could not admit to the allegations in the indictment and be innocent of committing the lesser included offense of aggravated assault).7 Accordingly, Bell’s claim that indictment was insufficient fails. 3. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wilsongreen1 sentence2021See Wilson, supra, 318 8 Ga. App. at 95 (1) (c) (i) (holding that the indictment charging the defendant with aggravated assault on a peace officer was sufficient to withstand a general demurrer where the defendant could not admit to the allegations in the indictment and be innocent of committing the lesser included offense of aggravated assault).7 Accordingly, Bell’s claim that indictment was insufficient fails. 3. | 1 | 1 |
Sims v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Therefore, as Bell cannot demonstrate any deficiency by his trial counsel to support his claims of ineffective assistance, Sims v. State, 278 Ga. 587, 589 (3) ( 604 SE2d 799 ) (2004), the trial court did not err in denying Bell’s motion for new trial. 2010Therefore, as Bell cannot demonstrate any deficiency by his trial counsel to support his claims of ineffective assistance, Sims v. State, 278 Ga. 587, 589 (3) ( 604 SE2d 799 ) (2004), the trial court did not err in denying Bell’s motion for new trial. | 1 | 1 |
Tyler v. Bennettgreen2 sentences2009“On appeal, this court does not review issues which were not raised and ruled on below. [Cit.]” Tyler v. Bennett, 215 Ga. App. 87, 88 (2) ( 449 SE2d 666 ) (1994). 2009“On appeal, this court does not review issues which were not raised and ruled on below. [Cit.]” Tyler v. Bennett, 215 Ga. App. 87, 88 (2) ( 449 SE2d 666 ) (1994). | 1 | 1 |
Crawford v. Washingtongreen1 sentence2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( | 1 | 1 |
Rayo-Leon v. Stategreen2 sentences2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( 2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( | 1 | 1 |
Reese v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Reese v. State, 270 Ga. App. 522, 523 ( 607 SE2d 165 ) (2004). 2 See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 The trial court granted Bell’s motion to suppress his refusal to submit to a breath test. 2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Reese v. State, 270 Ga. App. 522, 523 ( 607 SE2d 165 ) (2004). 2 See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 The trial court granted Bell’s motion to suppress his refusal to submit to a breath test. | 1 | 1 |
Waits v. Stategreen2 sentences2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( 2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( | 1 | 1 |
Grodhaus v. Stategreen2 sentences2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( 2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( | 1 | 1 |
Arsenault v. Stategreen2 sentences2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( 2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( | 1 | 1 |
Gresham v. Edwardsgreen2 sentences2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( 2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( | 1 | 1 |
Banks v. Stategreen2 sentences2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( 2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( | 1 | 1 |
Foster v. Stategreen2 sentences2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( 2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( | 1 | 1 |
Stone v. Stategreen2 sentences2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( 2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( | 1 | 1 |
Worsham v. Stategreen2 sentences2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( 2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( | 1 | 1 |
Wesson v. Stategreen2 sentences2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( 2008That ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 4 The trial court denied the State’s request for a continuance so that Corporal Mitchell could testify. 5 Banks v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. 543, 544 (1) ( 592 SE2d 668 ) (2004); see also Gresham v. Edwards, 281 Ga. 881, 883 (2) ( 644 SE2d 122 ) (2007) (the prohibition against testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (124 SC 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), is not applicable to preliminary hearings). 6 Wesson v. State, 279 Ga. App. 428, 431 (2) ( 631 SE2d 451 ) (2006). 7 See id. 8 See Rayo-Leon v. State, 281 Ga. App. 74, 75 (1) ( | 1 | 1 |
Garner v. Stategreen2 sentences2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 | 1 | 1 |
Batton v. Stategreen2 sentences2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 | 1 | 1 |
Hambrick v. Stategreen2 sentences2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 | 1 | 1 |
Wall v. Stategreen2 sentences2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 | 1 | 1 |
Lemons v. Stategreen2 sentences2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 | 1 | 1 |
Scott v. Stategreen2 sentences2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 | 1 | 1 |
Cook v. Stategreen2 sentences2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 2004The appeal was docketed in this Court on September 16, 2003, and was submitted for decision on briefs on November 14, 2003. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 See Cook v. State, 274 Ga. 891, 894 ( 561 SE2d 407 ) (2002); Garner v. State, 267 Ga. 884, 885 ( 485 SE2d 729 ) (1997); Hambrick v. State, 204 Ga. App. 668, 670 ( 420 SE2d 308 ) (1992); Milich, Georgia Rules of Evidence, § 27.2, p. 554 (2nd ed. 2002). 4 See, e.g., Scott v. State, 274 Ga. 476, 478 ( 554 SE2d 488 ) (2001); Button v. State, 260 Ga. 127, 130 ( 391 SE2d 914 ) (1990); Lemons v. State, 167 | 1 | 1 |
Bennett v. Stategreen1 sentence2002Compare Bennett, supra. Under the applicable rules of construction of pleadings, the trial court correctly found that Bell’s motion strictly complied with the requirements of OCGA § 17-7-171. 2. | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Hallgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Barraco v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Winniegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Davis v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Smith v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Almond v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Migliore v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Milsapgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Harris v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Blairgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Long v. Jonesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sales v. State
green
2 sentences2021Therefore, Bell’s claim that the trial court committed plain error in instructing the jury necessarily fails. 8 Bell’s reliance on Sales v. State, 296 Ga. 538 ( 769 SE2d 374 ) (2015), is misguided. 2021Therefore, Bell’s claim that the trial court committed plain error in instructing the jury necessarily fails. 8 Bell’s reliance on Sales v. State, 296 Ga. 538 ( 769 SE2d 374 ) (2015), is misguided. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| Vizzini v. Blonder green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.