14 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wrightgreen1 sentence2026Wright, 562 So.2d at 1195 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Dickerson v. Winn-Dixie, Inc.green1 sentence2009See Dickerson v. Winn-Dixie, Inc., 01-0807, p. 4 (La.App. 1st Cir.2/27/02), 816 So.2d 315, 317 , writ denied, 02-0951 (La.5/31/02), 817 So.2d 99 ; Holden v. Louisiana State University Medical Center-Shreveport, 29,268, pp. 4-5 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/97), 690 So.2d-958, 961, writ denied, 97-0797 (La.5/1/97), 693 So.2d 730 . | 1 | 1 |
Dickerson v. Winn-Dixie, Inc.green1 sentence2009See Dickerson v. Winn-Dixie, Inc., 01-0807, p. 4 (La.App. 1st Cir.2/27/02), 816 So.2d 315, 317 , writ denied, 02-0951 (La.5/31/02), 817 So.2d 99 ; Holden v. Louisiana State University Medical Center-Shreveport, 29,268, pp. 4-5 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/97), 690 So.2d-958, 961, writ denied, 97-0797 (La.5/1/97), 693 So.2d 730 . | 1 | 1 |
King Fisher Marine Service, Inc. v. The Np Sunbonnet, Her Engines, Etc., and Newpark Marine Services, Inc.green1 sentence2003The reasoning behind this rule is that “the owner is made whole by receiving the value of the boat at the time of loss and interest compensates the owner’s time value of money.” King Fisher Marine Serv., Inc. v. NP Sunbonnet, 724 F.2d 1181, 1187 (5th Cir.1984). | 1 | 1 |
Jennings v. Huntgreen1 sentence1999Jennings v. Hunt, 272 So.2d 333, 334 (La.1973) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Pitcher v. United Oil & Gas Syndicate, Inc.green2 sentences1996The supreme court explained the reasoning behind this doctrine in Pitcher v. United Oil & Gas Syndicate, Inc., 174 La. 66 , 139 So. 760, 761 (1932): An employee is never presumed to engage his services permanently, thereby cutting himself off from all chances of improving his condition; indeed, in this land of opportunity it would be against public policy and the spirit of our institutions that any man should thus handicap himself; and the law will presume almost juris et de jure that he did not so intend. 1996The supreme court explained the reasoning behind this doctrine in Pitcher v. United Oil & Gas Syndicate, Inc., 174 La. 66 , 139 So. 760, 761 (1932): An employee is never presumed to engage his services permanently, thereby cutting himself off from all chances of improving his condition; indeed, in this land of opportunity it would be against public policy and the spirit of our institutions that any man should thus handicap himself; and the law will presume almost juris et de jure that he did not so intend. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Edwards v. Sims
green
2 sentences1999Edwards v. Sims, supra[, 294 So.2d 611 (La.App. 4th Cir.l974)7. 1999Edwards v. Sims, supra[, 294 So.2d 611 (La.App. 4th Cir.l974)7. | 2 | 1990–1999 |
Himbola Manor Apartments v. Allen
green
2 sentences1986Himbola Manor Apartments v. Allen, supra. However, where the lessor has made frequent demands for payment or where acceptance of late payment occurs because of “unwilling and forced” indulgence on the lessor’s part, the foregoing rules'do not apply. 1981Himbola Manor Apartments v. Allen, supra. However, where the lessor has made frequent demands for payment or where acceptance of late payments occurs *984 because of "unwilling and forced" indulgence on the lessor's part, the foregoing rules do not apply. | 2 | 1981–1986 |
State v. Casey
green
1 sentence2026The reasoning behind this requirement is that “the judge, not the affiant, . . . must be satisfied as to the existence of probable cause.” Id. (quoting State v. Green, 2002-1022, p. 8 (La. 12/4/02), 831 So.2d 962, 969 ). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Green
green
2 sentences2026The reasoning behind this requirement is that “the judge, not the affiant, . . . must be satisfied as to the existence of probable cause.” Id. (quoting State v. Green, 2002-1022, p. 8 (La. 12/4/02), 831 So.2d 962, 969 ). 2026Accordingly, the affiant must give the magistrate judge sufficient “information to make an independent judgment that probable cause exists” rather than leaving the magistrate judge to ratify “the bare conclusions of others.” Id. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
McGill v. COCHRAN SYSCO FOODS, a DIV. OF SYSCO CORP.
green
1 sentence2009See Dickerson v. Winn-Dixie, Inc., 01-0807, p. 4 (La.App. 1st Cir.2/27/02), 816 So.2d 315, 317 , writ denied, 02-0951 (La.5/31/02), 817 So.2d 99 ; Holden v. Louisiana State University Medical Center-Shreveport, 29,268, pp. 4-5 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/97), 690 So.2d-958, 961, writ denied, 97-0797 (La.5/1/97), 693 So.2d 730 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
In Re Medical Review Panel
green
1 sentence2003Id. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Leon v. Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co.
green
2 sentences1999Although the recent cases cite this rule without explanation, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the reasoning behind the rule in Leon, 151 La. at 933-934 , 92 So. at 390 , in deciding that a June 1918 amendment to the Workers' Compensation laws did not apply to plaintiff's action where plaintiff was injured in February 1918. 1999Although the recent cases cite this rule without explanation, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the reasoning behind the rule in Leon, 151 La. at 933-934 , 92 So. at 390 , in deciding that a June 1918 amendment to the Workers' Compensation laws did not apply to plaintiff's action where plaintiff was injured in February 1918. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Smith v. Wembley Industries, Inc.
green
1 sentence1989Smith, supra, at 1109 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
In Re Adoption of Fouts
neutral
1 sentence1979The reasoning behind this rule was stated by the court in the case of In Re Adoption of Fouts, 254 So.2d 649 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1971). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Williams
neutral
1 sentence1979The reasoning behind the rule of Harris, supra, a rule thereafter approved by this Court (See e. g., State v. Williams, 271 So.2d 857 [La.1973]), compels us to reach a harmonious result in the instant case. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.