fair and impartial hearing in Oklahoma

14 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1926–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
TRM v. Stategreen oklacrimapp · 1979 · cited in 3 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1984–1987 2 sentences 1987See T.R.M. v. State, 596 P.2d 902, 905 (Okl.Cr.1979). 1984Cf. T.R.M. v. State, 596 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1979) (the fact that the record discloses that a fair and impartial hearing was afforded on the merits of the case is an important factor in determining a contention that the trial judge should have disqualified.) Other crimes evidence was improperly received in evidence against him.	2	3
Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentistsgreen okla · 1996 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 1 sentence 2005Johnson at ¶¶ 32-33 , 913 P.2d at 1347-48 (quotation & citations omitted). ¶ 16 Notwithstanding this internal safeguard, the Oklahoma Supreme Court has stated: Within an administrative agency the merger of investigative and enforcement responsibility with that of adjudication is not forbidden as a violation of due process if in the broader institutional framework safeguards do exist against unchecked administrative discretion and its abuse.	1	1
Callaham v. Childersgreen okla · 1940 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 2 sentences 1996"When circumstances and conditions surrounding litigation are of such a nature that they might cast doubt and question as to the impartiality of any judgment the trial judge may pronounce, said judge should certify his disqualification." Sadberry, 441 P.2d at 384 (quoting Callaham v. Childers, 186 Okla. 504 , 99 P.2d 126, 128 (1940)). 1996"When circumstances and conditions surrounding litigation are of such a nature that they might cast doubt and question as to the impartiality of any judgment the trial judge may pronounce, said judge should certify his disqualification." Sadberry, 441 P.2d at 384 (quoting Callaham v. Childers, 186 Okla. 504 , 99 P.2d 126, 128 (1940)).	1	1
CJW v. Stategreen oklacrimapp · 1987 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989 1 sentence 1989See C.J.W. v. State, 732 P.2d 908, 911 (Okl.Cr.1987).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (18)

Case	Cited	Years
Friedman v. Rogers green scotus · 1979 2 sentences 1994In Friedman v. Rogers, 440 U.S. 1, 18 , 99 S.Ct. 887, 898 , 59 L.Ed.2d 100 (1979), the Court notes that Rogers, an optometrist, has "a constitutional right to a fair and impartial hearing in any disciplinary proceeding conducted against him by the Board [of Optometry]." Id., citing Gibson, supra note 55 . 1994In Friedman v. Rogers, 440 U.S. 1, 18 , 99 S.Ct. 887, 898 , 59 L.Ed.2d 100 (1979), the Court notes that Rogers, an optometrist, has "a constitutional right to a fair and impartial hearing in any disciplinary proceeding conducted against him by the Board [of Optometry]." Id., citing Gibson, supra note 55 .	2	1994–1996
Kent v. United States green scotus · 1966 2 sentences 1984Here, we need only note that 10 O.S. 1981 , § 1112(b)(4), is modeled after the requirements mandated by Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 , 86 S.Ct. 1045 , 16 L.Ed.2d 84 (1966). 1984Here, we need only note that 10 O.S. 1981 , § 1112(b)(4), is modeled after the requirements mandated by Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 , 86 S.Ct. 1045 , 16 L.Ed.2d 84 (1966).	2	1984–1984
Lowrey v. Hodges green okla · 1976 1 sentence 2023Notably, this Court has repeatedly rejected appellate claims of partiality where the complaining party never sought disqualification at the administrative proceeding under 75 O.S.2011, § 316 See, e.g. , Lowrey v. Hodges , 1976 OK 132 555 P.2d 1016 Robbins v. Okla.	1	2023–2023
Ruscheinsky v. Ulrich green nd · 2000 2 sentences 2003Maxwell, 6 P.3d at 737 . ¶ 11 North Dakota likewise recognized this right to a hearing in Ruscheinsky v. Ulrich, 2000 ND 133, ¶ 10 , 612 N.W.2d 283, 286 . 2003Maxwell, 6 P.3d at 737 . ¶ 11 North Dakota likewise recognized this right to a hearing in Ruscheinsky v. Ulrich, 2000 ND 133, ¶ 10 , 612 N.W.2d 283, 286 .	1	2003–2003
State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. Maxwell green alaska · 2000 2 sentences 2003Maxwell, 6 P.3d at 737 . 2003Maxwell, 6 P.3d at 737 . ¶ 11 North Dakota likewise recognized this right to a hearing in Ruscheinsky v. Ulrich, 2000 ND 133, ¶ 10 , 612 N.W.2d 283, 286 .	1	2003–2003
Sadberry v. Wilson green okla · 1968 1 sentence 1996"When circumstances and conditions surrounding litigation are of such a nature that they might cast doubt and question as to the impartiality of any judgment the trial judge may pronounce, said judge should certify his disqualification." Sadberry, 441 P.2d at 384 (quoting Callaham v. Childers, 186 Okla. 504 , 99 P.2d 126, 128 (1940)).	1	1996–1996
Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp. green okla · 1986 2 sentences 1994II APA-governed agency, see supra note 8. [95] Braun, supra note 63 , 609 P.2d at 1273-1274 ; Cotton Petroleum, supra note 63 , 732 P.2d at 442-443 ; Amoco, supra note 63 , 751 P.2d at 207 ; Henry, supra note 63, 825 P.2d at 1317; Lincoln, supra note 63 , 827 P.2d at 1319. [96] The pertinent terms of 75 O.S. 1991 § 316, are: "A hearing examiner or agency member shall withdraw from any individual proceeding in which he cannot accord a fair and impartial hearing or consideration. 1994II APA-governed agency, see supra note 8. [95] Braun, supra note 63 , 609 P.2d at 1273-1274 ; Cotton Petroleum, supra note 63 , 732 P.2d at 442-443 ; Amoco, supra note 63 , 751 P.2d at 207 ; Henry, supra note 63, 825 P.2d at 1317; Lincoln, supra note 63 , 827 P.2d at 1319. [96] The pertinent terms of 75 O.S. 1991 § 316, are: "A hearing examiner or agency member shall withdraw from any individual proceeding in which he cannot accord a fair and impartial hearing or consideration.	1	1994–1994
Amoco Production Co. v. Corporation Commission green oklacivapp · 1986 2 sentences 1994II APA-governed agency, see supra note 8. [95] Braun, supra note 63 , 609 P.2d at 1273-1274 ; Cotton Petroleum, supra note 63 , 732 P.2d at 442-443 ; Amoco, supra note 63 , 751 P.2d at 207 ; Henry, supra note 63, 825 P.2d at 1317; Lincoln, supra note 63 , 827 P.2d at 1319. [96] The pertinent terms of 75 O.S. 1991 § 316, are: "A hearing examiner or agency member shall withdraw from any individual proceeding in which he cannot accord a fair and impartial hearing or consideration. 1994II APA-governed agency, see supra note 8. [95] Braun, supra note 63 , 609 P.2d at 1273-1274 ; Cotton Petroleum, supra note 63 , 732 P.2d at 442-443 ; Amoco, supra note 63 , 751 P.2d at 207 ; Henry, supra note 63, 825 P.2d at 1317; Lincoln, supra note 63 , 827 P.2d at 1319. [96] The pertinent terms of 75 O.S. 1991 § 316, are: "A hearing examiner or agency member shall withdraw from any individual proceeding in which he cannot accord a fair and impartial hearing or consideration.	1	1994–1994
Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty. green scotus · 1968 2 sentences 1994Grant Company, 416 U.S. 600, 610 , 94 S.Ct. 1895, 1901 , 40 L.Ed.2d 406 (1974); Schweiker v. McClure, 456 U.S. 188, 195 , 102 S.Ct. 1665, 1670 , 72 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982). [67] In Friedman, supra note 63 , 440 U.S. at 17-20 , 99 S.Ct. at 898-99, the Court made clear that in professional disciplinary proceedings a person has a right to a fair and impartial hearing board; Gibson, supra note 55 at 1698; Ward, supra note 62 ; Tumey, supra note 62 . [68] Taylor v. Hayes, 418 U.S. 488, 501-03 , 94 S.Ct. 2697, 2704-06 , 41 L.Ed.2d 897 (1974); Picketing v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 578-79 n. 2, 88 1994Grant Company, 416 U.S. 600, 610 , 94 S.Ct. 1895, 1901 , 40 L.Ed.2d 406 (1974); Schweiker v. McClure, 456 U.S. 188, 195 , 102 S.Ct. 1665, 1670 , 72 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982). [67] In Friedman, supra note 63 , 440 U.S. at 17-20 , 99 S.Ct. at 898-99, the Court made clear that in professional disciplinary proceedings a person has a right to a fair and impartial hearing board; Gibson, supra note 55 at 1698; Ward, supra note 62 ; Tumey, supra note 62 . [68] Taylor v. Hayes, 418 U.S. 488, 501-03 , 94 S.Ct. 2697, 2704-06 , 41 L.Ed.2d 897 (1974); Picketing v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 578-79 n. 2, 88	1	1994–1994
Taylor v. Hayes green scotus · 1974 2 sentences 1994Grant Company, 416 U.S. 600, 610 , 94 S.Ct. 1895, 1901 , 40 L.Ed.2d 406 (1974); Schweiker v. McClure, 456 U.S. 188, 195 , 102 S.Ct. 1665, 1670 , 72 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982). [67] In Friedman, supra note 63 , 440 U.S. at 17-20 , 99 S.Ct. at 898-99, the Court made clear that in professional disciplinary proceedings a person has a right to a fair and impartial hearing board; Gibson, supra note 55 at 1698; Ward, supra note 62 ; Tumey, supra note 62 . [68] Taylor v. Hayes, 418 U.S. 488, 501-03 , 94 S.Ct. 2697, 2704-06 , 41 L.Ed.2d 897 (1974); Picketing v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 578-79 n. 2, 88 1994Grant Company, 416 U.S. 600, 610 , 94 S.Ct. 1895, 1901 , 40 L.Ed.2d 406 (1974); Schweiker v. McClure, 456 U.S. 188, 195 , 102 S.Ct. 1665, 1670 , 72 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982). [67] In Friedman, supra note 63 , 440 U.S. at 17-20 , 99 S.Ct. at 898-99, the Court made clear that in professional disciplinary proceedings a person has a right to a fair and impartial hearing board; Gibson, supra note 55 at 1698; Ward, supra note 62 ; Tumey, supra note 62 . [68] Taylor v. Hayes, 418 U.S. 488, 501-03 , 94 S.Ct. 2697, 2704-06 , 41 L.Ed.2d 897 (1974); Picketing v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 578-79 n. 2, 88	1	1994–1994
Mayberry v. Pennsylvania green scotus · 1971 2 sentences 1994Mayberry v. Pennsylvania, 400 U.S. 455, 465 , 91 S.Ct. 499, 505 , 27 L.Ed.2d 532 (1971), teaches more eloquently than any other case that even an offending or abusive litigant does not lose the constitutional claim to a neutral decisionmaker. 1994Mayberry v. Pennsylvania, 400 U.S. 455, 465 , 91 S.Ct. 499, 505 , 27 L.Ed.2d 532 (1971), teaches more eloquently than any other case that even an offending or abusive litigant does not lose the constitutional claim to a neutral decisionmaker.	1	1994–1994
Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co. green scotus · 1974 2 sentences 1994Grant Company, 416 U.S. 600, 610 , 94 S.Ct. 1895, 1901 , 40 L.Ed.2d 406 (1974); Schweiker v. McClure, 456 U.S. 188, 195 , 102 S.Ct. 1665, 1670 , 72 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982). [67] In Friedman, supra note 63 , 440 U.S. at 17-20 , 99 S.Ct. at 898-99, the Court made clear that in professional disciplinary proceedings a person has a right to a fair and impartial hearing board; Gibson, supra note 55 at 1698; Ward, supra note 62 ; Tumey, supra note 62 . [68] Taylor v. Hayes, 418 U.S. 488, 501-03 , 94 S.Ct. 2697, 2704-06 , 41 L.Ed.2d 897 (1974); Picketing v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 578-79 n. 2, 88 1994Grant Company, 416 U.S. 600, 610 , 94 S.Ct. 1895, 1901 , 40 L.Ed.2d 406 (1974); Schweiker v. McClure, 456 U.S. 188, 195 , 102 S.Ct. 1665, 1670 , 72 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982). [67] In Friedman, supra note 63 , 440 U.S. at 17-20 , 99 S.Ct. at 898-99, the Court made clear that in professional disciplinary proceedings a person has a right to a fair and impartial hearing board; Gibson, supra note 55 at 1698; Ward, supra note 62 ; Tumey, supra note 62 . [68] Taylor v. Hayes, 418 U.S. 488, 501-03 , 94 S.Ct. 2697, 2704-06 , 41 L.Ed.2d 897 (1974); Picketing v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 578-79 n. 2, 88	1	1994–1994
Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission green okla · 1992 1 sentence 1994II APA-governed agency, see supra note 8. [95] Braun, supra note 63 , 609 P.2d at 1273-1274 ; Cotton Petroleum, supra note 63 , 732 P.2d at 442-443 ; Amoco, supra note 63 , 751 P.2d at 207 ; Henry, supra note 63, 825 P.2d at 1317; Lincoln, supra note 63 , 827 P.2d at 1319. [96] The pertinent terms of 75 O.S. 1991 § 316, are: "A hearing examiner or agency member shall withdraw from any individual proceeding in which he cannot accord a fair and impartial hearing or consideration.	1	1994–1994
C. F. Braun & Co. v. Corporation Commission green okla · 1980 1 sentence 1994II APA-governed agency, see supra note 8. [95] Braun, supra note 63 , 609 P.2d at 1273-1274 ; Cotton Petroleum, supra note 63 , 732 P.2d at 442-443 ; Amoco, supra note 63 , 751 P.2d at 207 ; Henry, supra note 63, 825 P.2d at 1317; Lincoln, supra note 63 , 827 P.2d at 1319. [96] The pertinent terms of 75 O.S. 1991 § 316, are: "A hearing examiner or agency member shall withdraw from any individual proceeding in which he cannot accord a fair and impartial hearing or consideration.	1	1994–1994
Schweiker v. McClure green scotus · 1982 2 sentences 1994Grant Company, 416 U.S. 600, 610 , 94 S.Ct. 1895, 1901 , 40 L.Ed.2d 406 (1974); Schweiker v. McClure, 456 U.S. 188, 195 , 102 S.Ct. 1665, 1670 , 72 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982). [67] In Friedman, supra note 63 , 440 U.S. at 17-20 , 99 S.Ct. at 898-99, the Court made clear that in professional disciplinary proceedings a person has a right to a fair and impartial hearing board; Gibson, supra note 55 at 1698; Ward, supra note 62 ; Tumey, supra note 62 . [68] Taylor v. Hayes, 418 U.S. 488, 501-03 , 94 S.Ct. 2697, 2704-06 , 41 L.Ed.2d 897 (1974); Picketing v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 578-79 n. 2, 88 1994Grant Company, 416 U.S. 600, 610 , 94 S.Ct. 1895, 1901 , 40 L.Ed.2d 406 (1974); Schweiker v. McClure, 456 U.S. 188, 195 , 102 S.Ct. 1665, 1670 , 72 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982). [67] In Friedman, supra note 63 , 440 U.S. at 17-20 , 99 S.Ct. at 898-99, the Court made clear that in professional disciplinary proceedings a person has a right to a fair and impartial hearing board; Gibson, supra note 55 at 1698; Ward, supra note 62 ; Tumey, supra note 62 . [68] Taylor v. Hayes, 418 U.S. 488, 501-03 , 94 S.Ct. 2697, 2704-06 , 41 L.Ed.2d 897 (1974); Picketing v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 578-79 n. 2, 88	1	1994–1994
Garland Rex Brinlee, Jr. v. Richard A. Crisp, Warden, and the State of Oklahoma green ca10 · 1979 1 sentence 1983A trial judge should never involve his personal views in the hearing of a matter, whether such views are manifested publicly, Brinlee v. Crisp, 608 F.2d 839 (10th Cir.1979), or are allowed to insidiously foreclose the right to a fair and impartial hearing, Haller v. Robbins, 409 F.2d 857 (1st Cir.1969).	1	1983–1983
Roger R. Haller v. Allan, L. Robbins, Warden of the Maine State Prison green ca1 · 1969 1 sentence 1983A trial judge should never involve his personal views in the hearing of a matter, whether such views are manifested publicly, Brinlee v. Crisp, 608 F.2d 839 (10th Cir.1979), or are allowed to insidiously foreclose the right to a fair and impartial hearing, Haller v. Robbins, 409 F.2d 857 (1st Cir.1969).	1	1983–1983
Jones v. State green oklacrimapp · 1921 1 sentence 1926Jones v. State, 20 Okla.	1	1926–1926

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 316 (5) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 250.3 (3) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 318 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 95 (1914–2020) IL 83 (1942–2026) CA 41 (1933–2024) FL 28 (1989–2023) AZ 19 (1922–2022) PA 18 (1952–2025) OH 18 (1953–2025) NJ 17 (1949–2024) NM 16 (1982–2020) TX 15 (1885–2025) OK 14 (1926–2023) SD 13 (1980–2018) WI 11 (1940–2023) WA 9 (1912–2024) MO 9 (1942–2007) RI 9 (1963–2021) GA 9 (1935–2004) CT 7 (1970–2002) NC 7 (1986–2025) MS 7 (1977–2012) AL 6 (1937–1987) ND 6 (1988–2019) SC 6 (1961–2015) IN 6 (1972–2003) MD 6 (1973–2001) KS 6 (1973–2015) LA 6 (1999–2021) ID 6 (1923–1993) MI 6 (1968–2003) VT 5 (1988–2025) MA 5 (1918–2003) CO 5 (1953–1987) WY 4 (1976–2022) MN 4 (1947–2005) AK 4 (1983–2024) HI 4 (1980–2011) IA 4 (1944–2012) NH 3 (1995–2000) NE 3 (1930–1974) MT 3 (1956–1980) ME 3 (1970–2026) OR 3 (1977–1992) TN 2 (1969–2022) NV 2 (1970–1986) AR 2 (2003–2012) DE 2 (2023–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check