6 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1972–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Derloshon v. City of Fort Wayne Ex Rel. Dept. of Redevelopmentgreen2 sentences1981See also, Derloshon v. City of Fort Wayne, Department of Redevelopment (1968), 250 Ind. 163 , 234 N.E.2d 269 ; City of Anderson v. State ex rel. 1981See also, Derloshon v. City of Fort Wayne, Department of Redevelopment (1968), 250 Ind. 163 , 234 N.E.2d 269 ; City of Anderson v. State ex rel. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re JT
green
2 sentences2001In In re J.T., the child's mother argued that the trial court had erroneously accepted the father's voluntary termination of his parental rights prior to the hearing on the termination of her rights because, had the trial court decided in her favor and declined to terminate her rights, she should have had the right to receive child support from the father. 742 N.E.2d 509 , 514 (Ind. Ct.App.2001), trans. denied. 2001In In re J.T., the child's mother argued that the trial court had erroneously accepted the father's voluntary termination of his parental rights prior to the hearing on the termination of her rights because, had the trial court decided in her favor and declined to terminate her rights, she should have had the right to receive child support from the father. 742 N.E.2d 509 , 514 (Ind. Ct.App.2001), trams. denied. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Brokus v. Brokus
green
1 sentence2003Father attempts to support his contention through reliance on Brokus v. Brokus, 420 N.E.2d 1242 (Ind.Ct.App.1981), where this court found that a father did not receive a fair and impartial hearing based on the trial court's comments, including: You can't take two or three year old girls away from their mother. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Goldberg v. Kelly
green
2 sentences1984This procedure, Northside submits, was condemned by the Supreme Court in Goldberg v. Kelly, (1970) 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 . 1984This procedure, Northside submits, was condemned by the Supreme Court in Goldberg v. Kelly, (1970) 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Ehrlich v. Perper
green
1 sentence1972Cir. 1963), 189 A. 2d 122, 123 , a civil case for child custody: “When a trial judge indulges in injudicious behavior and intemperate language, it is only natural that a losing litigant leaves the court with a deep-rooted feeling that he or she has been denied a fair and impartial hearing. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.