9 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1942–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Farris v. Farrisgreen2 sentences2007Further, “[t]he mere fact that a ruling is made against a party, however, does not show bias or prejudice on the part of the judge.” Farris v. Farris, 75 S.W.3d 345, 348 (Mo.App.2002). 2007Further, "[t]he mere fact that a ruling is made against a party, however, does not show bias or prejudice on the part of the judge." Farris v. Farris, 75 S.W.3d 345, 348 (Mo.App.2002). | 2 | 2 |
Blando v. Reidgreen2 sentences2007“It is the trial court’s duty not to do or say anything that might leave the impression it was not according all of the parties a fair and impartial hearing.” Cundiff v. Cline, 752 S.W.2d 409, 412 (Mo.App.1988). “ ‘A judge is entitled to the presumption that he will not undertake to preside in a trial in which he cannot be impartial.’ ” In re C.D.G., 108 S.W.3d at 678 (quoting Blando v. Reid, 886 S.W.2d 60, 65 (Mo.App.1994)). 2007"It is the trial court's duty not to do or say anything that might leave the impression it was not according all of the parties a fair and impartial hearing." Cundiff v. Cline, 752 S.W.2d 409, 412 (Mo.App.1988). "`A judge is entitled to the presumption that he will not undertake to preside in a trial in which he cannot be impartial.'" In re C.D.G., 108 S.W.3d at 678 (quoting Blando v. Reid, 886 S.W.2d 60, 65 (Mo.App.1994)). | 2 | 2 |
Cundiff v. Clinegreen2 sentences2007“It is the trial court’s duty not to do or say anything that might leave the impression it was not according all of the parties a fair and impartial hearing.” Cundiff v. Cline, 752 S.W.2d 409, 412 (Mo.App.1988). “ ‘A judge is entitled to the presumption that he will not undertake to preside in a trial in which he cannot be impartial.’ ” In re C.D.G., 108 S.W.3d at 678 (quoting Blando v. Reid, 886 S.W.2d 60, 65 (Mo.App.1994)). 2007"It is the trial court's duty not to do or say anything that might leave the impression it was not according all of the parties a fair and impartial hearing." Cundiff v. Cline, 752 S.W.2d 409, 412 (Mo.App.1988). "`A judge is entitled to the presumption that he will not undertake to preside in a trial in which he cannot be impartial.'" In re C.D.G., 108 S.W.3d at 678 (quoting Blando v. Reid, 886 S.W.2d 60, 65 (Mo.App.1994)). | 2 | 2 |
Hoffman v. Koehlergreen1 sentence1995The requirements of Rule 84.04(d) include: “The points relied on shall state briefly and concisely what actions or rulings of the court are sought to be reviewed and wherein and why they are claimed to be erroneous....” “The three components of a point relied on are (1) a concise statement of the challenged ruling of the trial court, (2) the rule of law which the court should have applied, and (3) the evidentiary basis upon which the asserted rule is applicable.” Hoffman v. Koehler, 757 S.W.2d 289, 292 [2] (Mo.App.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Rutlader v. Rutladergreen1 sentence1988Duncan v. Pinkston, 340 S.W.2d 753, 757 (Mo.1960); Rutlader v. Rutlader, 411 S.W.2d 826, 831 (Mo.App.1967). | 1 | 1 |
Duncan v. Pinkstongreen1 sentence1988Duncan v. Pinkston, 340 S.W.2d 753, 757 (Mo.1960); Rutlader v. Rutlader, 411 S.W.2d 826, 831 (Mo.App.1967). | 1 | 1 |
Garth v. Caldwellgreen1 sentence1942J., p. 866; Krum v. Jones, 25 Mo. App. 71 ; Garth v. Caldwell, 72 Mo. 622, 629, 630 .] It is insisted that the court erred in refusing the defendant, on cross-examination of plaintiff, to ask him whether he drank liquor while he was at Lone Jack, his home. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re CDG
green
2 sentences2007“It is the trial court’s duty not to do or say anything that might leave the impression it was not according all of the parties a fair and impartial hearing.” Cundiff v. Cline, 752 S.W.2d 409, 412 (Mo.App.1988). “ ‘A judge is entitled to the presumption that he will not undertake to preside in a trial in which he cannot be impartial.’ ” In re C.D.G., 108 S.W.3d at 678 (quoting Blando v. Reid, 886 S.W.2d 60, 65 (Mo.App.1994)). 2007"It is the trial court's duty not to do or say anything that might leave the impression it was not according all of the parties a fair and impartial hearing." Cundiff v. Cline, 752 S.W.2d 409, 412 (Mo.App.1988). "`A judge is entitled to the presumption that he will not undertake to preside in a trial in which he cannot be impartial.'" In re C.D.G., 108 S.W.3d at 678 (quoting Blando v. Reid, 886 S.W.2d 60, 65 (Mo.App.1994)). | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Withrow v. Larkin
green
2 sentences1986Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35 , 95 S.Ct. 1456, 1464 , 43 L.Ed.2d 712 (1975). 1986Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35 , 95 S.Ct. 1456, 1464 , 43 L.Ed.2d 712 (1975). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Duke v. Meissner
green
2 sentences1978We must assume they will honestly and efficiently perform the duties imposed on them by law and accord an impartial hearing on such appeals.” Using Duke v. Meissner, supra, as a guide, we find that the record fails to disclose that appellant was deprived of a fair and impartial hearing by the School Board. 1978We must assume they will honestly and efficiently perform the duties imposed on them by law and accord an impartial hearing on such appeals." Using Duke v. Meissner, supra, as a guide, we find that the record fails to disclose that appellant was deprived of a fair and impartial hearing by the School Board. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State Ex Rel. Alton Railroad v. Public Service Commission
neutral
2 sentences1960Co. v. Public Service Commission, supra. The five Alton railroad cases, decided in 1933, involved bridges, viaducts, subways and grade crossings in Kansas City and in the first of the cases, 334 Mo. 832 , 68 S.W. 2d 691, 693 , a new permanent underpass was ordered constructed “about 60 feet east of the east side of the present underpass.” After this cause was pending in the circuit court the railroad filed a motion “to remand cause to Public Service Commission to hear evidence of changed conditions or in the alternative to stay proceedings.” It is now urged that the circuit court erred in refu 1960Co. v. Public Service Commission, supra. The five Alton railroad cases, decided in 1933, involved bridges, viaducts, subways and grade crossings in Kansas City and in the first of the cases, 334 Mo. 832 , 68 S.W. 2d 691, 693 , a new permanent underpass was ordered constructed “about 60 feet east of the east side of the present underpass.” After this cause was pending in the circuit court the railroad filed a motion “to remand cause to Public Service Commission to hear evidence of changed conditions or in the alternative to stay proceedings.” It is now urged that the circuit court erred in refu | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Craig v. Thompson
green
1 sentence1952Craig v. Thompson, Mo.Sup., 244 S.W.2d 37 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Keyes v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
green
1 sentence1942Co., 31 S. W. (2d) 50 .] *1148 There was no error in the a'etion of the eonrt in refusing to permit, defendant’s witnesses, who were familiar with hearings conducted by defendant, to testify that the written report of the proceedings at the hearing showed that plaintiif was given a fair and impartial hearing. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Krum v. Jones
neutral
1 sentence1942J., p. 866; Krum v. Jones, 25 Mo. App. 71 ; Garth v. Caldwell, 72 Mo. 622, 629, 630 .] It is insisted that the court erred in refusing the defendant, on cross-examination of plaintiff, to ask him whether he drank liquor while he was at Lone Jack, his home. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.