14 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
CHARLESTON CO. SOCIAL SERV. v. Fathergreen2 sentences2018Servs. v. Father, Stepmother, & Mother, 317 S.C. 283, 288 , 454 S.E.2d 307, 310 (1995) ("There is a long standing rule in South Carolina that one judge may not overrule another judge of the same court."). 2015Servs. v. Father, 317 S.C. 283, 288 , 454 S.E.2d 307, 310 (1995) ("There is a long- standing rule in this State that one judge of the same court cannot overrule another."); Bailey v. State, 309 S.C. 455, 464 , 424 S.E.2d 503, 508 (1992) ("[A] determination of an attorney's costs and expenses for trial preparation shall also be made within the discretion of the trial judge."). | 2 | 4 |
Charleston County Department of Social Services v. Fathergreen2 sentences2018Servs. v. Father, Stepmother, & Mother, 317 S.C. 283, 288 , 454 S.E.2d 307, 310 (1995) ("There is a long standing rule in South Carolina that one judge may not overrule another judge of the same court."). 2015Servs. v. Father, 317 S.C. 283, 288 , 454 S.E.2d 307, 310 (1995) ("There is a long- standing rule in this State that one judge of the same court cannot overrule another."); Bailey v. State, 309 S.C. 455, 464 , 424 S.E.2d 503, 508 (1992) ("[A] determination of an attorney's costs and expenses for trial preparation shall also be made within the discretion of the trial judge."). | 2 | 4 |
Shelton v. Bressantgreen2 sentences2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s 2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s | 2 | 2 |
DEPT. OF SOC. SERV. v. Millergreen2 sentences2018Servs. v. Miller, 324 S.C. 445 , 457, 477 S.E.2d 476 , 483 (Ct. App. 1996) ("There is a long standing rule in South Carolina that one judge may not overrule another judge of the same court."). the sex offender registry issue pursuant to the prior ruling, which held the registry issue in abeyance and provided that a review hearing would be held if needed. 2018Servs. v. Miller, 324 S.C. 445 , 457, 477 S.E.2d 476 , 483 (Ct. App. 1996) ("There is a long standing rule in South Carolina that one judge may not overrule another judge of the same court."). the sex offender registry issue pursuant to the prior ruling, which held the registry issue in abeyance and provided that a review hearing would be held if needed. | 1 | 2 |
Cook v. Taylorgreen2 sentences2018In fact, the family court held the review hearing on 1 Our record indicates the family court held the hearing after Appellant turned eighteen due to Appellant's lack of progress in his treatment. 2 See Cook v. Taylor, 272 S.C. 536, 538 , 252 S.E.2d 923, 924 (1979) (holding a judge did not have the power to set aside the order of his predecessor); Dorchester Cty. 2018In fact, the family court held the review hearing on 1 Our record indicates the family court held the hearing after Appellant turned eighteen due to Appellant's lack of progress in his treatment. 2 See Cook v. Taylor, 272 S.C. 536, 538 , 252 S.E.2d 923, 924 (1979) (holding a judge did not have the power to set aside the order of his predecessor); Dorchester Cty. | 1 | 1 |
Bailey v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Servs. v. Father, 317 S.C. 283, 288 , 454 S.E.2d 307, 310 (1995) ("There is a long- standing rule in this State that one judge of the same court cannot overrule another."); Bailey v. State, 309 S.C. 455, 464 , 424 S.E.2d 503, 508 (1992) ("[A] determination of an attorney's costs and expenses for trial preparation shall also be made within the discretion of the trial judge."). 2015Servs. v. Father, 317 S.C. 283, 288 , 454 S.E.2d 307, 310 (1995) ("There is a long- standing rule in this State that one judge of the same court cannot overrule another."); Bailey v. State, 309 S.C. 455, 464 , 424 S.E.2d 503, 508 (1992) ("[A] determination of an attorney's costs and expenses for trial preparation shall also be made within the discretion of the trial judge."). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Belchergreen2 sentences2013Six months after Appellant's trial concluded, our supreme court in State v. Belcher, 385 S.C. 597, 600 , 685 S.E.2d 802, 803-04 (2009), held that a jury charge instructing that malice may be inferred from the use of a deadly weapon "is no longer good law in South Carolina where evidence is presented that would reduce, mitigate, excuse or justify the homicide." The court, however, reiterated the long- standing rule, "[e]rrors, including erroneous jury instructions, are subject to harmless error analysis." Id. at 611 , 685 S.E.2d at 809 . 2013Six months after Appellant's trial concluded, our supreme court in State v. Belcher, 385 S.C. 597, 600 , 685 S.E.2d 802, 803-04 (2009), held that a jury charge instructing that malice may be inferred from the use of a deadly weapon "is no longer good law in South Carolina where evidence is presented that would reduce, mitigate, excuse or justify the homicide." The court, however, reiterated the long- standing rule, "[e]rrors, including erroneous jury instructions, are subject to harmless error analysis." Id. at 611 , 685 S.E.2d at 809 . | 1 | 1 |
Widdicombe v. Tucker-Calesgreen2 sentences2009See Shelton v. Bressant , 312 S.C. 183, 184 , 439 S.E.2d 833, 834 (1993) ("Acts of an attorney are directly attributable to and binding upon a client."); Smith v. Pearson , 210 S.C. 524, 530 , 43 S.E.2d 479, 481 (1947) (finding appellants bound by statement made by counsel at the outset of hearing); Widdicombe v. Tucker-Cales , 366 S.C. 75 , 90 n.5, 620 S.E.2d 333 , 341 n.5 (Ct. App. 2005) ("[A] party is generally bound by stipulations made by their counsel."). 2009See Shelton v. Bressant , 312 S.C. 183, 184 , 439 S.E.2d 833, 834 (1993) ("Acts of an attorney are directly attributable to and binding upon a client."); Smith v. Pearson , 210 S.C. 524, 530 , 43 S.E.2d 479, 481 (1947) (finding appellants bound by statement made by counsel at the outset of hearing); Widdicombe v. Tucker-Cales , 366 S.C. 75 , 90 n.5, 620 S.E.2d 333 , 341 n.5 (Ct. App. 2005) ("[A] party is generally bound by stipulations made by their counsel."). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Pearsongreen2 sentences2009See Shelton v. Bressant , 312 S.C. 183, 184 , 439 S.E.2d 833, 834 (1993) ("Acts of an attorney are directly attributable to and binding upon a client."); Smith v. Pearson , 210 S.C. 524, 530 , 43 S.E.2d 479, 481 (1947) (finding appellants bound by statement made by counsel at the outset of hearing); Widdicombe v. Tucker-Cales , 366 S.C. 75 , 90 n.5, 620 S.E.2d 333 , 341 n.5 (Ct. App. 2005) ("[A] party is generally bound by stipulations made by their counsel."). 2009See Shelton v. Bressant , 312 S.C. 183, 184 , 439 S.E.2d 833, 834 (1993) ("Acts of an attorney are directly attributable to and binding upon a client."); Smith v. Pearson , 210 S.C. 524, 530 , 43 S.E.2d 479, 481 (1947) (finding appellants bound by statement made by counsel at the outset of hearing); Widdicombe v. Tucker-Cales , 366 S.C. 75 , 90 n.5, 620 S.E.2d 333 , 341 n.5 (Ct. App. 2005) ("[A] party is generally bound by stipulations made by their counsel."). | 1 | 1 |
Bank of Babylon v. Quirkgreen1 sentence2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s | 1 | 1 |
Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc.green2 sentences2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s 2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s | 1 | 1 |
Conner v. City of Forest Acresgreen2 sentences2006Co., Inc. , 321 S.C. 182 , 467 S.E.2d 448 (Ct. App. 1996) (regarding suit on overdue accounts and counterclaim for breach of contract). [18] See, e.g. , Conner v. City of Forest Acres , 348 S.C. 454, 465-66 , 560 S.E.2d 606, 612 (2002) (discussing breach of contract accompanied by a fraudulent act); Daisy Outdoor Adver. 2006Co., Inc. , 321 S.C. 182 , 467 S.E.2d 448 (Ct. App. 1996) (regarding suit on overdue accounts and counterclaim for breach of contract). [18] See, e.g. , Conner v. City of Forest Acres , 348 S.C. 454, 465-66 , 560 S.E.2d 606, 612 (2002) (discussing breach of contract accompanied by a fraudulent act); Daisy Outdoor Adver. | 1 | 1 |
Dean v. Ruscon Corp.green2 sentences2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s 2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s | 1 | 1 |
Koutsogiannis v. BB & Tgreen2 sentences2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s 2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s | 1 | 1 |
State v. McCrarygreen2 sentences2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s 2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s | 1 | 1 |
Bright v. Orr-Lyons Millgreen2 sentences1998We recognize there is a long standing rule that “ ‘[i]f the employee be injured while passing, with the express or implied consent of the employer, to and from his work by a way over the employer’s premises, ... the injury is ... in the course of the employment as much as though it had happened while the employee was engaged in his work at the place of its performance.’ ” Bright v. Orr-Lyons Mill, 285 S.C. 58, 60 , 328 S.E.2d 68, 70 (1985) (quoting Eargle v. South Carolina Elec. & Gas Co., 205 S.C. 423, 430 , 32 S.E.2d 240, 243 (1944)). 1998We recognize there is a long standing rule that “ ‘[i]f the employee be injured while passing, with the express or implied consent of the employer, to and from his work by a way over the employer’s premises, ... the injury is ... in the course of the employment as much as though it had happened while the employee was engaged in his work at the place of its performance.’ ” Bright v. Orr-Lyons Mill, 285 S.C. 58, 60 , 328 S.E.2d 68, 70 (1985) (quoting Eargle v. South Carolina Elec. & Gas Co., 205 S.C. 423, 430 , 32 S.E.2d 240, 243 (1944)). | 1 | 1 |
Eargle v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.green2 sentences1998We recognize there is a long standing rule that “ ‘[i]f the employee be injured while passing, with the express or implied consent of the employer, to and from his work by a way over the employer’s premises, ... the injury is ... in the course of the employment as much as though it had happened while the employee was engaged in his work at the place of its performance.’ ” Bright v. Orr-Lyons Mill, 285 S.C. 58, 60 , 328 S.E.2d 68, 70 (1985) (quoting Eargle v. South Carolina Elec. & Gas Co., 205 S.C. 423, 430 , 32 S.E.2d 240, 243 (1944)). 1998We recognize there is a long standing rule that “ ‘[i]f the employee be injured while passing, with the express or implied consent of the employer, to and from his work by a way over the employer’s premises, ... the injury is ... in the course of the employment as much as though it had happened while the employee was engaged in his work at the place of its performance.’ ” Bright v. Orr-Lyons Mill, 285 S.C. 58, 60 , 328 S.E.2d 68, 70 (1985) (quoting Eargle v. South Carolina Elec. & Gas Co., 205 S.C. 423, 430 , 32 S.E.2d 240, 243 (1944)). | 1 | 1 |
Nippert v. City of Richmondgreen2 sentences1983See, for example, Nippert v. City of Richmond, 327 U. S. 416 , 66 S. Ct. 586 , 90 L. 1983See, for example, Nippert v. City of Richmond, 327 U. S. 416 , 66 S. Ct. 586 , 90 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2019We do not think that any further objection was required under these facts in order to preserve the rights of the defendant."); Johnson, 333 S.C. at 64 n.1, 508 S.E.2d at 30 n.1 (clarifying the long- standing rule that "where a party requests a jury charge and, after opportunity for discussion, the trial judge declines the charge, it is unnecessary, to preserve the point on appeal, to renew the request at the conclusion of the court's instruction"). 2019We do not think that any further objection was required under these facts in order to preserve the rights of the defendant."); Johnson, 333 S.C. at 64 n.1, 508 S.E.2d at 30 n.1 (clarifying the long- standing rule that "where a party requests a jury charge and, after opportunity for discussion, the trial judge declines the charge, it is unnecessary, to preserve the point on appeal, to renew the request at the conclusion of the court's instruction"). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Richard Caldwell v. Ricky Bell, Warden
green
1 sentence2013On appeal, Appellant cites to Caldwell v. Bell, 288 F.3d 838 (6th Cir. 2002), as an example that a permissive inference instruction on malice cannot be deemed harmless when there is evidence of provocation, justification, or excuse. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Maddux Supply Co. v. A-C Electric Co.
neutral
2 sentences2006Co., Inc. , 321 S.C. 182 , 467 S.E.2d 448 (Ct. App. 1996) (regarding suit on overdue accounts and counterclaim for breach of contract). [18] See, e.g. , Conner v. City of Forest Acres , 348 S.C. 454, 465-66 , 560 S.E.2d 606, 612 (2002) (discussing breach of contract accompanied by a fraudulent act); Daisy Outdoor Adver. 2006Co., Inc. , 321 S.C. 182 , 467 S.E.2d 448 (Ct. App. 1996) (regarding suit on overdue accounts and counterclaim for breach of contract). [18] See, e.g. , Conner v. City of Forest Acres , 348 S.C. 454, 465-66 , 560 S.E.2d 606, 612 (2002) (discussing breach of contract accompanied by a fraudulent act); Daisy Outdoor Adver. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Berry v. McLeod
green
2 sentences2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s 2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Regions Bank v. Schmauch
green
2 sentences2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s 2006Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (2005); Dean v. Ruscon Corp. , 321 S.C. 360, 363 , 468 S.E.2d 645, 647 (1996); Berry v. McLeod , 328 S.C. 435, 444-45 , 492 S.E.2d 794 , 799 (Ct. App. 1997). [13] In correspondence dated May 20, 1996, Hansen pointedly alleged Moran had mishandled his claim and expressed his intent to sue Moran for legal malpractice. [14] See Koutsogiannis v. BB&T, 365 S.C. 145, 149 , 616 S.E.2d 425, 428 (2005) (In the attorney-client relationship, clients are generally bound by their attorneys acts or omissions during the course of the legal representation that fall within the apparent s | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Lowndes Hill Realty Co. v. Greenville Concrete Co.
green
2 sentences1991Lowndes Hill Realty Co. v. Greenville Concrete Co., 229 S.C. 619 , 93 S.E. (2d) 855 (1956). 1991Lowndes Hill Realty Co. v. Greenville Concrete Co., 229 S.C. 619 , 93 S.E. (2d) 855 (1956). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Strickland v. Chaplin
neutral
1 sentence1977The contention of respondents is, in effect, that Strickland v. Chaplin, 199 S. C. 203, 18 S. E. (2d) 736 , decided four years after Oswald , changed the long standing principle that the statutory preclusion of suit during the administration period suspends the running of the applicable statute of limitations. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.