Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1960–1990 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Cloughgreen2 sentences1968See In re Clough, 28 Ariz. 204 , 236 P. 700 (1925); In re Adoption of Luke, 3 Ariz.App. 327 , 414 P.2d 176 (1966). 1968See In re Clough, 28 Ariz. 204 , 236 P. 700 (1925); In re Adoption of Luke, 3 Ariz.App. 327 , 414 P.2d 176 (1966). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Blackburn v. State
green
2 sentences1979The long standing rule of this court, Blackburn v. State, 31 Ariz. 427 , 254 P. 467 , that any objection to remarks of counsel should be offered at the time the statements are made so that the lower court may instruct the jury to disregard the comments was not modified by State v. White. " (Emphasis added.) Claimed errors occurring during arguments must be preserved as a minimum by an objection at the close of the argument. 1979The long standing rule of this court, Blackburn v. State, 31 Ariz. 427 , 254 P. 467 , that any objection to remarks of counsel should be offered at the time the statements are made so that the lower court may instruct the jury to disregard the comments was not modified by State v. White. " (Emphasis added.) Claimed errors occurring during arguments must be preserved as a minimum by an objection at the close of the argument. | 2 | 1960–1979 |
In Re Adoption of Luke
green
2 sentences1968See In re Clough, 28 Ariz. 204 , 236 P. 700 (1925); In re Adoption of Luke, 3 Ariz.App. 327 , 414 P.2d 176 (1966). 1968See In re Clough, 28 Ariz. 204 , 236 P. 700 (1925); In re Adoption of Luke, 3 Ariz.App. 327 , 414 P.2d 176 (1966). | 2 | 1968–1968 |
Pascucci v. Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences1990Pascucci v. Industrial Commission, 126 Ariz. 442 , 616 P.2d 902 (App.1980). 1990Pascucci v. Industrial Commission, 126 Ariz. 442 , 616 P.2d 902 (App.1980). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Direct Sellers Association
green
2 sentences1984State v. Direct Seller’s Assoc., 108 Ariz. 165 , 494 P.2d 361 (1972); Oglesby v. Pacific Finance Corp., 44 Ariz. 449 , 38 P.2d 646 (1934). 1984State v. Direct Seller’s Assoc., 108 Ariz. 165 , 494 P.2d 361 (1972); Oglesby v. Pacific Finance Corp., 44 Ariz. 449 , 38 P.2d 646 (1934). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Oglesby v. Pacific Finance Corp.
green
2 sentences1984State v. Direct Seller’s Assoc., 108 Ariz. 165 , 494 P.2d 361 (1972); Oglesby v. Pacific Finance Corp., 44 Ariz. 449 , 38 P.2d 646 (1934). 1984State v. Direct Seller’s Assoc., 108 Ariz. 165 , 494 P.2d 361 (1972); Oglesby v. Pacific Finance Corp., 44 Ariz. 449 , 38 P.2d 646 (1934). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
People v. Cooper
green
2 sentences1982Although some state courts have suggested limits to Bartkus, Commonwealth v. Mills, 447 Pa. 163 , 286 A.2d 638 (1971); State v. Fletcher, 26 Ohio St.2d 221 , 271 N.E.2d 567 (1971); People v. Cooper, 398 Mich. 450 , 247 N.W.2d 866 (1976), we find no reason to change this long standing rule. 1982Although some state courts have suggested limits to Bartkus, Commonwealth v. Mills, 447 Pa. 163 , 286 A.2d 638 (1971); State v. Fletcher, 26 Ohio St.2d 221 , 271 N.E.2d 567 (1971); People v. Cooper, 398 Mich. 450 , 247 N.W.2d 866 (1976), we find no reason to change this long standing rule. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Fletcher
green
2 sentences1982Although some state courts have suggested limits to Bartkus, Commonwealth v. Mills, 447 Pa. 163 , 286 A.2d 638 (1971); State v. Fletcher, 26 Ohio St.2d 221 , 271 N.E.2d 567 (1971); People v. Cooper, 398 Mich. 450 , 247 N.W.2d 866 (1976), we find no reason to change this long standing rule. 1982Although some state courts have suggested limits to Bartkus, Commonwealth v. Mills, 447 Pa. 163 , 286 A.2d 638 (1971); State v. Fletcher, 26 Ohio St.2d 221 , 271 N.E.2d 567 (1971); People v. Cooper, 398 Mich. 450 , 247 N.W.2d 866 (1976), we find no reason to change this long standing rule. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Condos v. Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences1982Condos v. Industrial Commission, 92 Ariz. 299 , 376 P.2d 767 (1962). 1982Condos v. Industrial Commission, 92 Ariz. 299 , 376 P.2d 767 (1962). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Commonwealth v. Mills
green
2 sentences1982Although some state courts have suggested limits to Bartkus, Commonwealth v. Mills, 447 Pa. 163 , 286 A.2d 638 (1971); State v. Fletcher, 26 Ohio St.2d 221 , 271 N.E.2d 567 (1971); People v. Cooper, 398 Mich. 450 , 247 N.W.2d 866 (1976), we find no reason to change this long standing rule. 1982Although some state courts have suggested limits to Bartkus, Commonwealth v. Mills, 447 Pa. 163 , 286 A.2d 638 (1971); State v. Fletcher, 26 Ohio St.2d 221 , 271 N.E.2d 567 (1971); People v. Cooper, 398 Mich. 450 , 247 N.W.2d 866 (1976), we find no reason to change this long standing rule. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Jurek v. Jurek
green
2 sentences1980The court determined that personal injury recoveries are the separate property of the injured spouse except insofar as the recovery is for lost wages and expenses for hospital and medical care incurred during the marriage. 124 Ariz. at 598 , 606 P.2d at 814 . 1980The court determined that personal injury recoveries are the separate property of the injured spouse except insofar as the recovery is for lost wages and expenses for hospital and medical care incurred during the marriage. 124 Ariz. at 598 , 606 P.2d at 814 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.