Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Active Market, Inc. v. Leightongreen1 sentence1996See, e.g., Wolfe v. Wallingford Bank Trust Co., 124 Conn. 500 (1938). | 1 | 1 |
William Condon v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Leatrice Brodner v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Servicesgreen1 sentence1992See, e.g., Condon v. Bowen, 853 F.2d 66 , 68-69 n. 1 (2d Cir. 1988) (statutory provision entitling claimant to reimbursement for attorneys' fees protects action from mootness challenge); Davis v. Village Park II Realty Co., 578 F.2d 461 , 463 (2d Cir. 1978) (where claims for injunctive and declaratory relief have been rendered moot, "the availability of either nominal or substantial damages [in a civil rights action] is sufficient to prevent [the] case from becoming moot"); Unisys Corp. v. Dept. of Labor, supra, 697 n. 6 (where prayer for relief combines injunctive relief with request for "suc | 1 | 1 |
Joseph J. Bush v. United States of America, Arthur H. Otey v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1990State v. Osman, 21 Conn. App. 299, 303 , 573 A.2d 743 (1990). “[I]t would be a dismal reflection on society to say that when the guardians of its security are called to testify in court under oath, their testimony must be viewed with suspicion.” Bush v. United States, 375 F.2d 602, 604 (1967). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
green
2 sentences1997Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, supra, 237 Conn. 184 . 1997Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, supra, 237 Conn. 184 . | 2 | 1997–1997 |
In re Samantha C.
green
1 sentence2019This reflects ‘‘the long- standing principle that the trier of fact is entitled to draw all fair and reasonable inferences from the facts and circumstances [that] it finds established by the evidence, which consist both of what was said, and what naturally would have been.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 636 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Simmons v. State
green
2 sentences1999Laurel, Inc. v. Commissioner of Transportation, 180 Conn. 11 , 31 , 428 A.2d 789 (1980); Simmons v. State, 160 Conn. 492 , 500 , 280 A.2d 351 (1971); Torrington v. Coles, 155 Conn. 199 , 201 , 230 A.2d 550 (1967); New Haven v. East Haven, supra, 35 Conn. Sup. 165 . 1999Laurel, Inc. v. Commissioner of Transportation, 180 Conn. 11 , 31 , 428 A.2d 789 (1980); Simmons v. State, 160 Conn. 492 , 500 , 280 A.2d 351 (1971); Torrington v. Coles, 155 Conn. 199 , 201 , 230 A.2d 550 (1967); New Haven v. East Haven, supra, 35 Conn. Sup. 165 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Struckman v. Burns
green
2 sentences1999The language of § 25-42 , which empowers municipalities to condemn property without expressly mentioning the State, is akin to Connecticut General Statutes § 52-192a , which provides for CT Page 8041 awards of prejudgment interest "in any civil action." In Struckman v. Burns, 205 Conn. 542 , 559-560 , 534 A.2d 888 (1987), the Supreme Court held that "notwithstanding the general language of the statute, an award of prejudgment interest against the State of Connecticut was barred due to the absence of a waiver of the State's sovereign immunity from such an award by either express language in the 1999The language of § 25-42 , which empowers municipalities to condemn property without expressly mentioning the State, is akin to Connecticut General Statutes § 52-192a , which provides for CT Page 8041 awards of prejudgment interest "in any civil action." In Struckman v. Burns, 205 Conn. 542 , 559-560 , 534 A.2d 888 (1987), the Supreme Court held that "notwithstanding the general language of the statute, an award of prejudgment interest against the State of Connecticut was barred due to the absence of a waiver of the State's sovereign immunity from such an award by either express language in the | 1 | 1999–1999 |
City of Torrington v. Coles
green
2 sentences1999Laurel, Inc. v. Commissioner of Transportation, 180 Conn. 11 , 31 , 428 A.2d 789 (1980); Simmons v. State, 160 Conn. 492 , 500 , 280 A.2d 351 (1971); Torrington v. Coles, 155 Conn. 199 , 201 , 230 A.2d 550 (1967); New Haven v. East Haven, supra, 35 Conn. Sup. 165 . 1999Laurel, Inc. v. Commissioner of Transportation, 180 Conn. 11 , 31 , 428 A.2d 789 (1980); Simmons v. State, 160 Conn. 492 , 500 , 280 A.2d 351 (1971); Torrington v. Coles, 155 Conn. 199 , 201 , 230 A.2d 550 (1967); New Haven v. East Haven, supra, 35 Conn. Sup. 165 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Laurel, Inc. v. Commissioner of Transportation
green
2 sentences1999Laurel, Inc. v. Commissioner of Transportation, 180 Conn. 11 , 31 , 428 A.2d 789 (1980); Simmons v. State, 160 Conn. 492 , 500 , 280 A.2d 351 (1971); Torrington v. Coles, 155 Conn. 199 , 201 , 230 A.2d 550 (1967); New Haven v. East Haven, supra, 35 Conn. Sup. 165 . 1999Laurel, Inc. v. Commissioner of Transportation, 180 Conn. 11 , 31 , 428 A.2d 789 (1980); Simmons v. State, 160 Conn. 492 , 500 , 280 A.2d 351 (1971); Torrington v. Coles, 155 Conn. 199 , 201 , 230 A.2d 550 (1967); New Haven v. East Haven, supra, 35 Conn. Sup. 165 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Kelley
green
2 sentences1994In State v. Kelley, 229 Conn. 557, 563-64 , 643 A.2d 854 (1994), our Supreme Court rejected the defendant’s claim that constancy testimony did not fall within a recognized hearsay exception. 1994In State v. Kelley, 229 Conn. 557, 563-64 , 643 A.2d 854 (1994), our Supreme Court rejected the defendant’s claim that constancy testimony did not fall within a recognized hearsay exception. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Lynch v. Muzio
green
1 sentence1992See, e.g., Condon v. Bowen, 853 F.2d 66 , 68-69 n. 1 (2d Cir. 1988) (statutory provision entitling claimant to reimbursement for attorneys' fees protects action from mootness challenge); Davis v. Village Park II Realty Co., 578 F.2d 461 , 463 (2d Cir. 1978) (where claims for injunctive and declaratory relief have been rendered moot, "the availability of either nominal or substantial damages [in a civil rights action] is sufficient to prevent [the] case from becoming moot"); Unisys Corp. v. Dept. of Labor, supra, 697 n. 6 (where prayer for relief combines injunctive relief with request for "suc | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Cummings v. Tripp
green
1 sentence1992See, e.g., Condon v. Bowen, 853 F.2d 66 , 68-69 n. 1 (2d Cir. 1988) (statutory provision entitling claimant to reimbursement for attorneys' fees protects action from mootness challenge); Davis v. Village Park II Realty Co., 578 F.2d 461 , 463 (2d Cir. 1978) (where claims for injunctive and declaratory relief have been rendered moot, "the availability of either nominal or substantial damages [in a civil rights action] is sufficient to prevent [the] case from becoming moot"); Unisys Corp. v. Dept. of Labor, supra, 697 n. 6 (where prayer for relief combines injunctive relief with request for "suc | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Doyon v. Town of South Windsor
neutral
2 sentences1992See, e.g., Condon v. Bowen, 853 F.2d 66 , 68-69 n. 1 (2d Cir. 1988) (statutory provision entitling claimant to reimbursement for attorneys' fees protects action from mootness challenge); Davis v. Village Park II Realty Co., 578 F.2d 461 , 463 (2d Cir. 1978) (where claims for injunctive and declaratory relief have been rendered moot, "the availability of either nominal or substantial damages [in a civil rights action] is sufficient to prevent [the] case from becoming moot"); Unisys Corp. v. Dept. of Labor, supra, 697 n. 6 (where prayer for relief combines injunctive relief with request for "suc 1992See, e.g., Condon v. Bowen, 853 F.2d 66 , 68-69 n. 1 (2d Cir. 1988) (statutory provision entitling claimant to reimbursement for attorneys' fees protects action from mootness challenge); Davis v. Village Park II Realty Co., 578 F.2d 461 , 463 (2d Cir. 1978) (where claims for injunctive and declaratory relief have been rendered moot, "the availability of either nominal or substantial damages [in a civil rights action] is sufficient to prevent [the] case from becoming moot"); Unisys Corp. v. Dept. of Labor, supra, 697 n. 6 (where prayer for relief combines injunctive relief with request for "suc | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Maggie Davis v. Village Park II Realty Co., Carabetta Enterprises, Inc., and Joyce Furlong
green
1 sentence1992See, e.g., Condon v. Bowen, 853 F.2d 66 , 68-69 n. 1 (2d Cir. 1988) (statutory provision entitling claimant to reimbursement for attorneys' fees protects action from mootness challenge); Davis v. Village Park II Realty Co., 578 F.2d 461 , 463 (2d Cir. 1978) (where claims for injunctive and declaratory relief have been rendered moot, "the availability of either nominal or substantial damages [in a civil rights action] is sufficient to prevent [the] case from becoming moot"); Unisys Corp. v. Dept. of Labor, supra, 697 n. 6 (where prayer for relief combines injunctive relief with request for "suc | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Cristofaro v. Planning & Zoning Commission of Burlington
green
1 sentence1991Saradjian v. Saradjian, 25 Conn. App. 411, 419 , 595 A.2d 890 (1991); Goold v. Goold, 11 Conn. App. 268, 282 , 527 A.2d 696 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 810 , 528 A.2d 1156 (1987); Hanson v. Department of Income Maintenance, 10 Conn. App. 14, 18 , 521 A.2d 208 (1987). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Pfizer, Inc. v. McGirr
green
1 sentence1991Saradjian v. Saradjian, 25 Conn. App. 411, 419 , 595 A.2d 890 (1991); Goold v. Goold, 11 Conn. App. 268, 282 , 527 A.2d 696 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 810 , 528 A.2d 1156 (1987); Hanson v. Department of Income Maintenance, 10 Conn. App. 14, 18 , 521 A.2d 208 (1987). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Bergin
green
1 sentence1991State v. Bergin, 214 Conn. 657 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Hanson v. Department of Income Maintenance
green
2 sentences1991Saradjian v. Saradjian, 25 Conn. App. 411, 419 , 595 A.2d 890 (1991); Goold v. Goold, 11 Conn. App. 268, 282 , 527 A.2d 696 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 810 , 528 A.2d 1156 (1987); Hanson v. Department of Income Maintenance, 10 Conn. App. 14, 18 , 521 A.2d 208 (1987). 1991Saradjian v. Saradjian, 25 Conn. App. 411, 419 , 595 A.2d 890 (1991); Goold v. Goold, 11 Conn. App. 268, 282 , 527 A.2d 696 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 810 , 528 A.2d 1156 (1987); Hanson v. Department of Income Maintenance, 10 Conn. App. 14, 18 , 521 A.2d 208 (1987). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Goold v. Goold
green
2 sentences1991Saradjian v. Saradjian, 25 Conn. App. 411, 419 , 595 A.2d 890 (1991); Goold v. Goold, 11 Conn. App. 268, 282 , 527 A.2d 696 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 810 , 528 A.2d 1156 (1987); Hanson v. Department of Income Maintenance, 10 Conn. App. 14, 18 , 521 A.2d 208 (1987). 1991Saradjian v. Saradjian, 25 Conn. App. 411, 419 , 595 A.2d 890 (1991); Goold v. Goold, 11 Conn. App. 268, 282 , 527 A.2d 696 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 810 , 528 A.2d 1156 (1987); Hanson v. Department of Income Maintenance, 10 Conn. App. 14, 18 , 521 A.2d 208 (1987). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Saradjian v. Saradjian
green
2 sentences1991Saradjian v. Saradjian, 25 Conn. App. 411, 419 , 595 A.2d 890 (1991); Goold v. Goold, 11 Conn. App. 268, 282 , 527 A.2d 696 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 810 , 528 A.2d 1156 (1987); Hanson v. Department of Income Maintenance, 10 Conn. App. 14, 18 , 521 A.2d 208 (1987). 1991Saradjian v. Saradjian, 25 Conn. App. 411, 419 , 595 A.2d 890 (1991); Goold v. Goold, 11 Conn. App. 268, 282 , 527 A.2d 696 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 810 , 528 A.2d 1156 (1987); Hanson v. Department of Income Maintenance, 10 Conn. App. 14, 18 , 521 A.2d 208 (1987). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
In Re Griffiths
green
2 sentences1991In re Application of Griffiths, 162 Conn. 249, 255 , 294 A.2d 281 (1972), rev’d on other grounds, 413 U.S. 717 , 93 S. Ct. 2851 , 37 L. 1991In re Application of Griffiths, 162 Conn. 249, 255 , 294 A.2d 281 (1972), rev’d on other grounds, 413 U.S. 717 , 93 S. Ct. 2851 , 37 L. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
In Re Application of Griffiths
green
2 sentences1991In re Application of Griffiths, 162 Conn. 249, 255 , 294 A.2d 281 (1972), rev’d on other grounds, 413 U.S. 717 , 93 S. Ct. 2851 , 37 L. 1991In re Application of Griffiths, 162 Conn. 249, 255 , 294 A.2d 281 (1972), rev’d on other grounds, 413 U.S. 717 , 93 S. Ct. 2851 , 37 L. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Wood
green
2 sentences1990State v. Wood, 208 Conn. 125, 134 , 545 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 895 , 109 S. Ct. 235 , 102 L. 1990State v. Wood, 208 Conn. 125, 134 , 545 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 895 , 109 S. Ct. 235 , 102 L. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Osman
green
2 sentences1990State v. Osman, 21 Conn. App. 299, 303 , 573 A.2d 743 (1990). “[I]t would be a dismal reflection on society to say that when the guardians of its security are called to testify in court under oath, their testimony must be viewed with suspicion.” Bush v. United States, 375 F.2d 602, 604 (1967). 1990State v. Osman, 21 Conn. App. 299, 303 , 573 A.2d 743 (1990). “[I]t would be a dismal reflection on society to say that when the guardians of its security are called to testify in court under oath, their testimony must be viewed with suspicion.” Bush v. United States, 375 F.2d 602, 604 (1967). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Ferenc v. Internal Revenue Service
green
2 sentences1990State v. Wood, 208 Conn. 125, 134 , 545 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 895 , 109 S. Ct. 235 , 102 L. 1990State v. Wood, 208 Conn. 125, 134 , 545 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 895 , 109 S. Ct. 235 , 102 L. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Kitchen v. Indiana
green
1 sentence1990State v. Wood, 208 Conn. 125, 134 , 545 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 895 , 109 S. Ct. 235 , 102 L. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Gilmore v. American Tube & Stamping Co.
neutral
2 sentences1988Brown v. Blauvelt, 152 Conn. 272, 274 , 205 A.2d 773 (1964); Gilmore v. American Tube & Stamping Co., 79 Conn. 498, 504 , 66 A. 4 (1907); B. 1988Brown v. Blauvelt, 152 Conn. 272, 274 , 205 A.2d 773 (1964); Gilmore v. American Tube & Stamping Co., 79 Conn. 498, 504 , 66 A. 4 (1907); B. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Brown v. Blauvelt
green
2 sentences1988Brown v. Blauvelt, 152 Conn. 272, 274 , 205 A.2d 773 (1964); Gilmore v. American Tube & Stamping Co., 79 Conn. 498, 504 , 66 A. 4 (1907); B. 1988Brown v. Blauvelt, 152 Conn. 272, 274 , 205 A.2d 773 (1964); Gilmore v. American Tube & Stamping Co., 79 Conn. 498, 504 , 66 A. 4 (1907); B. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.