14 Texas opinions name it 4 courts 1879–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Union Gas Corp. v. Gislergreen2 sentences2003Gisler, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7581, at *2, *13, *20, *29 . 2003Gisler, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7581, at *2, *13, *20, *29 . | 7 | 7 |
Corpus Christi American Federation of Teachers v. Corpus Christi Independent School Districtgreen2 sentences1984See Corpus Christi American Federation of Teachers v. Corpus Christi Independent School District, 572 S.W.2d 663 (Tex. 1978). 1984See Corpus Christ1 American Federation of Teachers v. Corpus Christ1 Independent School District, 572 S.W.2d 663 (Tex. 1978). | 2 | 2 |
Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. Mirandagreen1 sentence2015See Miranda, 133 S.W.3d at 226 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
green
1 sentence2015Bill Johnson’s Rests., 461 U.S. at 748-49 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Texas Commerce Bank National Association v. Tripp
neutral
1 sentence2015The Union will likely rely on Texas Commerce Bank N.A. v. Tripp, 516 S.W.2d 256 (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Vaca v. Sipes
green
2 sentences1975Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 , 87 S.Ct. 903 , 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967). 1975Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 , 87 S.Ct. 903 , 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
People v. . Fitzgerald
neutral
2 sentences1908But these statutes are not directed against and do not apply to exhumations made by public officials, with a view of ascertaining whether a crime has been committed; nor do they apply to a person who having obtained the necessary permit from the constituted authorities removes the dead body of a relative or friend for reinterment.” The case of Fitzgerald v. People, 105 N. Y., 146 ; 11 N. E., 378 , is the most nearly in point, which in our own examination we have been able to find. 1908But these statutes are not directed against and do not apply to exhumations made by public officials, with a view of ascertaining whether a crime has been committed; nor do they apply to a person who having obtained the necessary permit from the constituted authorities removes the dead body of a relative or friend for reinterment.” The case of Fitzgerald v. People, 105 N. Y., 146 ; 11 N. E., 378 , is the most nearly in point, which in our own examination we have been able to find. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Chicago City v. Robbins
green
1 sentence1879(Shear. & Red. on Neg., secs. 79, 82, and authorities cited; Hilliard v. Richardson, 3 Gray, 349 , where, in an elaborate opinion, the leading authorities on this subject are collected and reviewed; Chicago v. Robbins, 2 Black, 418, 428 .) The subsequent and, in our opinion, better-considered decisions than that of Bush v. Steinman now follow the leading cases of Reedie v. London and Northwestern Railway Co., 4 Exch., 244, to the effect that such employer is not thus liable for the acts of an independent contractor. (1 Red. on Railways, ch. 20; Pierce on Amer. | 1 | 1879–1879 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.