Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1943–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McKelvey v. Creeveygreen2 sentences2011First Union also cites McKelvey v. Creevey, 72 Conn. 464, 466-67 , 45 A. 4, 5 (1900) (mortgagee is owner of land, and as between mortgagor and mortgagee, the mortgagee is regarded as having legal title to the land). 2011First Union also cites McKelvey v. Creevey, 72 Conn. 464, 466-67 , 45 A. 4, 5 (1900) (mortgagee is owner of land, and as between mortgagor and mortgagee, the mortgagee is regarded as having legal title to the land). | 1 | 1 |
KGS Steel, Inc. v. McInishgreen1 sentence2010The trial court was presented with conflicting evidence regarding whether Harris in fact had a workplace accident on July 6. “[T]he trial court is in the best position to weigh conflicting evidence and to judge the credibility of witnesses.... ” Ex parte McInish, 47 So.3d 767, 773 (Ala. 2008). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.
green
1 sentence2010On that form, Harris asserted that his claim was not “based on an accident” but instead was based on “repetitive motion [and] lifting for several years.” For purposes of his workers’ compensation claim, Harris’s allegation that he suddenly injured his back while lifting up and pulling the drain on the macerator machine, if believed by the fact-finder, would indicate that Harris had an “accident.” See § 25-5-1(7), Ala.Code 1975 (defining an “accident” as “an unexpected or unforeseen event, happening suddenly and violently... .”); Ex parte Trinity Indus., Inc., 680 So.2d at 266 n. 3 (stating tha | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Wilson v. FIRST UNION NAT. BANK OF GEORGIA
green
1 sentence2002Thus, the trial court's consideration of this form did not require conversion of the motion into one for a summary judgment." Wilson v. First Union Nat'l Bank of Georgia , 716 So.2d 722 , 726 (Ala.Civ.App. 1998). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Moore v. ClaimSouth, Inc.
green
2 sentences1995As in Moore v. ClaimSouth, Inc., 628 So.2d 500 (Ala.1993), Union's summary judgment motion did not contain a narrative summary. 1995As in Moore v. ClaimSouth, Inc. , 628 So.2d 500 (Ala. 1993), Union's summary judgment motion did not contain a narrative summary. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Leonard v. Roebuck
neutral
2 sentences1983Co. v. Johnston , 205 Ala. 1 , 87 So. 866 (1920); Adams Hardware Co. v. Wimbish , 201 Ala. 548 , 78 So. 902 (1918); Gillespie v. Hester , 160 Ala. 444 , 49 So. 580 (1909); Leonard v. Roebuck , 152 Ala. 312 , 44 So. 390 (1907). *Page 1221 The Willcutts have sufficiently stated a cause of action for rescission and supported it in Mr. Willcutt's affidavit and answers to interrogatories to withstand Union's motion for summary judgment. 1983Co. v. Johnston , 205 Ala. 1 , 87 So. 866 (1920); Adams Hardware Co. v. Wimbish , 201 Ala. 548 , 78 So. 902 (1918); Gillespie v. Hester , 160 Ala. 444 , 49 So. 580 (1909); Leonard v. Roebuck , 152 Ala. 312 , 44 So. 390 (1907). *Page 1221 The Willcutts have sufficiently stated a cause of action for rescission and supported it in Mr. Willcutt's affidavit and answers to interrogatories to withstand Union's motion for summary judgment. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Gillespie v. Hester
neutral
2 sentences1983Co. v. Johnston , 205 Ala. 1 , 87 So. 866 (1920); Adams Hardware Co. v. Wimbish , 201 Ala. 548 , 78 So. 902 (1918); Gillespie v. Hester , 160 Ala. 444 , 49 So. 580 (1909); Leonard v. Roebuck , 152 Ala. 312 , 44 So. 390 (1907). *Page 1221 The Willcutts have sufficiently stated a cause of action for rescission and supported it in Mr. Willcutt's affidavit and answers to interrogatories to withstand Union's motion for summary judgment. 1983Co. v. Johnston , 205 Ala. 1 , 87 So. 866 (1920); Adams Hardware Co. v. Wimbish , 201 Ala. 548 , 78 So. 902 (1918); Gillespie v. Hester , 160 Ala. 444 , 49 So. 580 (1909); Leonard v. Roebuck , 152 Ala. 312 , 44 So. 390 (1907). *Page 1221 The Willcutts have sufficiently stated a cause of action for rescission and supported it in Mr. Willcutt's affidavit and answers to interrogatories to withstand Union's motion for summary judgment. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Johnston
green
2 sentences1983Co. v. Johnston , 205 Ala. 1 , 87 So. 866 (1920); Adams Hardware Co. v. Wimbish , 201 Ala. 548 , 78 So. 902 (1918); Gillespie v. Hester , 160 Ala. 444 , 49 So. 580 (1909); Leonard v. Roebuck , 152 Ala. 312 , 44 So. 390 (1907). *Page 1221 The Willcutts have sufficiently stated a cause of action for rescission and supported it in Mr. Willcutt's affidavit and answers to interrogatories to withstand Union's motion for summary judgment. 1983Co. v. Johnston , 205 Ala. 1 , 87 So. 866 (1920); Adams Hardware Co. v. Wimbish , 201 Ala. 548 , 78 So. 902 (1918); Gillespie v. Hester , 160 Ala. 444 , 49 So. 580 (1909); Leonard v. Roebuck , 152 Ala. 312 , 44 So. 390 (1907). *Page 1221 The Willcutts have sufficiently stated a cause of action for rescission and supported it in Mr. Willcutt's affidavit and answers to interrogatories to withstand Union's motion for summary judgment. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Adams Hardware Co. v. Wimbish
neutral
2 sentences1983Co. v. Johnston , 205 Ala. 1 , 87 So. 866 (1920); Adams Hardware Co. v. Wimbish , 201 Ala. 548 , 78 So. 902 (1918); Gillespie v. Hester , 160 Ala. 444 , 49 So. 580 (1909); Leonard v. Roebuck , 152 Ala. 312 , 44 So. 390 (1907). *Page 1221 The Willcutts have sufficiently stated a cause of action for rescission and supported it in Mr. Willcutt's affidavit and answers to interrogatories to withstand Union's motion for summary judgment. 1983Co. v. Johnston , 205 Ala. 1 , 87 So. 866 (1920); Adams Hardware Co. v. Wimbish , 201 Ala. 548 , 78 So. 902 (1918); Gillespie v. Hester , 160 Ala. 444 , 49 So. 580 (1909); Leonard v. Roebuck , 152 Ala. 312 , 44 So. 390 (1907). *Page 1221 The Willcutts have sufficiently stated a cause of action for rescission and supported it in Mr. Willcutt's affidavit and answers to interrogatories to withstand Union's motion for summary judgment. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Burleson Unemployment Compensation Case
green
2 sentences1976In this regard, it is germane to note that the Pennsylvania courts were faced with a similar situation in Burleson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review , 173 Pa. Super. 527 , 98 A.2d 762 . 1976In this regard, it is germane to note that the Pennsylvania courts were faced with a similar situation in Burleson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review , 173 Pa. Super. 527 , 98 A.2d 762 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl
green
2 sentences1953Building Service, etc., Union v. Gazzam, supra. The cases of Cafeteria Employees Union v. Angelos, 320 U.S. 293 , *Page 505 64 S.Ct. 126 , 88 L.Ed. 58 , and Bakery and Pastry Drivers and Helpers Local 802 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl 315 U.S. 769 , 62 S.Ct. 816 , 86 L.Ed. 1178 relied on by appellees, were decided without the influence of an act such as the Taft-Hartley Act which prohibits coercion to force employees in the matter of deciding whether they will join a union or select a bargaining representative. 1953Building Service, etc., Union v. Gazzam, supra. The cases of Cafeteria Employees Union v. Angelos, 320 U.S. 293 , *Page 505 64 S.Ct. 126 , 88 L.Ed. 58 , and Bakery and Pastry Drivers and Helpers Local 802 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl 315 U.S. 769 , 62 S.Ct. 816 , 86 L.Ed. 1178 relied on by appellees, were decided without the influence of an act such as the Taft-Hartley Act which prohibits coercion to force employees in the matter of deciding whether they will join a union or select a bargaining representative. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302 v. Angelos
green
2 sentences1953Building Service, etc., Union v. Gazzam, supra. The cases of Cafeteria Employees Union v. Angelos, 320 U.S. 293 , *Page 505 64 S.Ct. 126 , 88 L.Ed. 58 , and Bakery and Pastry Drivers and Helpers Local 802 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl 315 U.S. 769 , 62 S.Ct. 816 , 86 L.Ed. 1178 relied on by appellees, were decided without the influence of an act such as the Taft-Hartley Act which prohibits coercion to force employees in the matter of deciding whether they will join a union or select a bargaining representative. 1953Building Service, etc., Union v. Gazzam, supra. The cases of Cafeteria Employees Union v. Angelos, 320 U.S. 293 , *Page 505 64 S.Ct. 126 , 88 L.Ed. 58 , and Bakery and Pastry Drivers and Helpers Local 802 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl 315 U.S. 769 , 62 S.Ct. 816 , 86 L.Ed. 1178 relied on by appellees, were decided without the influence of an act such as the Taft-Hartley Act which prohibits coercion to force employees in the matter of deciding whether they will join a union or select a bargaining representative. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co.
neutral
2 sentences1943Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co., 205 Ala. 425 , 88 So. 423 ; Sovereign Camp, W. 1943Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co., 205 Ala. 425 , 88 So. 423 ; Sovereign Camp, W. | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.