Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1954–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United Steelworkers of America, for Itself and on Behalf of Local 12943 v. The Mead Corporation, Fine Paper Divisiongreen2 sentences2024In United Steelworkers of America v. Mead Corp., 21 F.3d 128, 130 (6th Cir. 1994), the company and the union entered into a CBA which stated, “ ‘The Company agrees to maintain, during the term of this Agreement, a retirement plan as agreed upon with the Union.’ ” The company proposed a plan to offer cash violated, the claim was premised on the CBA and fell within that scope, and the claim implicated no rights arising independently from the CBA. 2024In United Steelworkers of America v. Mead Corp., 21 F.3d 128, 130 (6th Cir. 1994), the company and the union entered into a CBA which stated, “ ‘The Company agrees to maintain, during the term of this Agreement, a retirement plan as agreed upon with the Union.’ ” The company proposed a plan to offer cash bonuses to employees on the condition that they agreed to retire. | 2 | 2 |
Paul Hammontree v. National Labor Relations Board, Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware, Intervenorgreen1 sentence2021It is merely the prudent exercise of restraint, a postponement of the use of the [Commission]’s processes to give the parties’ own dispute resolution machinery a chance to succeed.’ ” Hammontree v. Nat’l Labor Relations Bd., 925 F.2d 1486, 1497 (D.C. | 1 | 1 |
Ricketts v. Board of Accountancygreen1 sentence2020Id.; see also Ricketts v. Bd. of Accountancy, 111 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
Gord v. F. S. Harmon & Co.green2 sentences1954Compare, Gord v. Harmon & Co., 188 Wash. 134 , 61 P. (2d) 1294 .” *814 We shall now consider the action of the trial court in denying the Union’s motion, (a) for a stay of the lawsuit started by Greyhound in the superior court, and (b) the application of the Union for an order directing Greyhound to submit the particular controversy to arbitration. 1954Compare, Gord v. Harmon & Co., 188 Wash. 134 , 61 P. (2d) 1294 .” *814 We shall now consider the action of the trial court in denying the Union’s motion, (a) for a stay of the lawsuit started by Greyhound in the superior court, and (b) the application of the Union for an order directing Greyhound to submit the particular controversy to arbitration. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Local No. 207, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers Union v. Perko
green
2 sentences1988The Court ruled in Local 207, Int'l Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers v. Perko, 373 U.S. 701 , 10 L. 1988The Court ruled in Local 207, Int'l Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers v. Perko, 373 U.S. 701 , 10 L. | 2 | 1988–1988 |
Tiberino v. Spokane County
green
1 sentence2019The Foundation did not *542 argue that any more information was needed for the court to rule, and it did not seek in camera review of any responsive records. 6 ¶22 Ultimately, the trial court granted the Union's motion for summary judgment and a permanent injunction "primarily" because it concluded that, under Tiberino, 103 Wash. App. 680 , 13 P.3d 1104 , "emails [are not] public records simply because they [are] on a state agency's server." CP at 693. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Tiberino v. Spokane County, Office of the Prosecuting Attorney
green
1 sentence2019The Foundation did not *542 argue that any more information was needed for the court to rule, and it did not seek in camera review of any responsive records. 6 ¶22 Ultimately, the trial court granted the Union's motion for summary judgment and a permanent injunction "primarily" because it concluded that, under Tiberino, 103 Wash. App. 680 , 13 P.3d 1104 , "emails [are not] public records simply because they [are] on a state agency's server." CP at 693. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Christensen v. Grant County Hospital District No. 1
green
1 sentence2018“There is nothing inherently unfair about [issue preclusion] provided the party has the full and fair opportunity to litigate, there is no significant disparity of relief, and all the other requirements of collateral estoppel are satisfied.” Christensen, 152 Wn.2d at 313 . 5 In his brief on appeal, Mr. Scholz distinguishes the Union’s claim in arbitration from his disability discrimination lawsuit by relying on several cases that involve claim preclusion, rather than issue preclusion. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
ASS'N OF FIREFIGHTERS v. Tukwila
green
2 sentences2000On a Union motion for summary judgment, the trial court applied International Association of Firefighters, Local No. 2088 v. City of Tukwila, 22 Wn. 2000App. 683 , 591 P.2d 475 (1979), and concluded that Union was entitled to the social security and Medicare sums paid by Airport from 1995 through 1998, continuing to the expiration of the current bargaining agreement. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Bradford v. Data Processing Joint Board
green
2 sentences2000Citing Tukwila and Bradford v. Data Processing Joint Board, 106 Wn.2d 368 , 722 P.2d 95 (1986), the trial court granted Union’s motion. 2000Citing Tukwila and Bradford v. Data Processing Joint Board, 106 Wn.2d 368 , 722 P.2d 95 (1986), the trial court granted Union’s motion. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.