Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Florida opinions name it 4 courts 1971–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'Ngreen1 sentence2008A parole revocation hearing "is not a traditional adversary criminal trial, and evidentiary proof is not required to follow strict rules of evidence." Jones v. Fla. Parole & Probation Comm'n, 348 So.2d 681, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (citing Singletary v. State, 290 So.2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Dupardgreen2 sentences2005In State v. Dupard, 93 Wash.2d 268 , 609 P.2d 961 (1980), the Supreme Court of Washington reached a similar conclusion regarding the impact of a determination made in a parole revocation hearing on a subsequent criminal prosecution. 2005In State v. Dupard, 93 Wash.2d 268 , 609 P.2d 961 (1980), the Supreme Court of Washington reached a similar conclusion regarding the impact of a determination made in a parole revocation hearing on a subsequent criminal prosecution. | 1 | 1 |
Moody v. Daggettgreen2 sentences1982See Moody v. Daggett, 429 U.S. 78 , 97 S.Ct. 274 , 50 L.Ed.2d 236 (1976). 1982See Moody v. Daggett, 429 U.S. 78 , 97 S.Ct. 274 , 50 L.Ed.2d 236 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
Gibbs v. Cochrangreen1 sentence1978See Gibbs v. Cochran, 142 So.2d 276 (Fla. 1962). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Morrissey v. Brewer
green
2 sentences1976The "preliminary hearing" in parole revocation proceedings mandated by Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972), is to determine the existence of probable cause or reason to believe the arrested parolee has committed acts that would constitute a violation of his parole. 1976As you are aware, Morrissey v. Brewer, supra, also mandates that prior to a final decision of revocation the parolee be afforded the opportunity for a "hearing" if desired. | 3 | 1975–1976 |
Gagnon v. Scarpelli
red
2 sentences1980In Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 , 36 L.Ed. 2d 656 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 (1973), the United States Supreme Court ruled that even though a parole revocation hearing was not criminal, but administrative in nature, that, nevertheless, in some circumstances, an attorney should be appointed to represent the defendant. 1980In Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 , 36 L.Ed. 2d 656 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 (1973), the United States Supreme Court ruled that even though a parole revocation hearing was not criminal, but administrative in nature, that, nevertheless, in some circumstances, an attorney should be appointed to represent the defendant. | 2 | 1974–1980 |
Singletary v. State
green
1 sentence2008A parole revocation hearing "is not a traditional adversary criminal trial, and evidentiary proof is not required to follow strict rules of evidence." Jones v. Fla. Parole & Probation Comm'n, 348 So.2d 681, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (citing Singletary v. State, 290 So.2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Kinsler v. State
green
1 sentence1988"While evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment is admissible at a parole revocation hearing, such evidence is not admissible during a criminal trial." Id., citing Croteau . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Croteau v. State
green
1 sentence1978Croteau v. State, 334 So.2d 577 (Fla. 1976). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Brumit v. Wainwright
green
1 sentence1974This Court in Brumit v. Wainwright, 290 So.2d 39 (Fla.1973), and Voulo v. Wainwright, 290 So.2d 58 (Fla.1974), held that, inasmuch as a person cannot be on parole and at the same time be in jail, the incarceration of an individual terminates the interruption of his sentence represented by the parole he is serving. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Voulo v. Wainwright
green
1 sentence1974This Court in Brumit v. Wainwright, 290 So.2d 39 (Fla.1973), and Voulo v. Wainwright, 290 So.2d 58 (Fla.1974), held that, inasmuch as a person cannot be on parole and at the same time be in jail, the incarceration of an individual terminates the interruption of his sentence represented by the parole he is serving. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Wolff v. McDonnell
green
2 sentences1974In Wolff v. McDonell, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 , the United States Supreme Court specifically stated that Gagnon v. Scarpelli, supra, is to receive only prospective application. 1974In Wolff v. McDonell, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 , the United States Supreme Court specifically stated that Gagnon v. Scarpelli, supra, is to receive only prospective application. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Herbert Lee Cox v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden, Ohio Penitentiary
green
1 sentence1971Parole is a matter of grace in Ohio, DiMarco v. Denton, Warden, 385 F.2d 556 (6th Cir. 1967) ; Cox v. Maxwell, Warden, 366 F.2d 765 (6th Cir. 1966).” We hold that under the above-cited cases, the petitioner in the present proceeding was not entitled to a right to counsel at the parole revocation hearing, and so the basic point he raises in his petition for the writ of habeas corpus is without merit. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
cluster 277817
green
1 sentence1971Parole is a matter of grace in Ohio, DiMarco v. Denton, Warden, 385 F.2d 556 (6th Cir. 1967) ; Cox v. Maxwell, Warden, 366 F.2d 765 (6th Cir. 1966).” We hold that under the above-cited cases, the petitioner in the present proceeding was not entitled to a right to counsel at the parole revocation hearing, and so the basic point he raises in his petition for the writ of habeas corpus is without merit. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.