Witherspoon violation in Louisiana

13 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Witherspoon v. Illinoisgreen scotus · 1968 · cited in 3 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1976–2018 2 sentences 1976He relies on Witherspoon v. State of Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , 88 S.Ct. 1770 , 20 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968), which held: ". . . [T]hat a sentence of death cannot be carried out if the jury that imposed or recommended it was chosen by excluding veniremen for cause simply because they voiced general objections to the death penalty or expressed conscientious or religious scruples against its infliction." The trial court did not sentence the defendant to death, therefore, he does not have a valid complaint of a Witherspoon violation. 1976He relies on Witherspoon v. State of Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , 88 S.Ct. 1770 , 20 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968), which held: ". . . [T]hat a sentence of death cannot be carried out if the jury that imposed or recommended it was chosen by excluding veniremen for cause simply because they voiced general objections to the death penalty or expressed conscientious or religious scruples against its infliction." The trial court did not sentence the defendant to death, therefore, he does not have a valid complaint of a Witherspoon violation.	1	3

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (31)

Case	Cited	Years
Wainwright v. Witt green scotus · 1985 2 sentences 2018C.Cr.P. art. 798(2)(b), which incorporates the Witherspoon standard, as clarified by Witt , is that the juror's views "would prevent or substantially impair him from making an impartial decision as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath." 469 U.S. at 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 . 2018C.Cr.P. art. 798(2)(b), which incorporates the Witherspoon standard, as clarified by Witt , is that the juror's views "would prevent or substantially impair him from making an impartial decision as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath." 469 U.S. at 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844 .	4	1988–2018
Clark v. Smith green scotus · 1971 2 sentences 2017Duplessis v. Louisiana , 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2282 , 29 L.Ed.2d 856 (1971). 2017Duplessis v. Louisiana , 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2282 , 29 L.Ed.2d 856 (1971).	3	1976–2017
Morgan v. Illinois green scotus · 1992 2 sentences 2003The "substantial impairment" standard enunciated in Witt was applied to a reverse- Witherspoon challenge by the United States Supreme Court in Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 , 112 S.Ct. 2222 , 119 L.Ed.2d 492 (1992), and by this court in several cases, including Ball, Taylor, Ross, and State v. Duncan, 99-2615 (La.10/16/01), 802 So.2d 533 . 2003The "substantial impairment" standard enunciated in Witt was applied to a reverse- Witherspoon challenge by the United States Supreme Court in Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 , 112 S.Ct. 2222 , 119 L.Ed.2d 492 (1992), and by this court in several cases, including Ball, Taylor, Ross, and State v. Duncan, 99-2615 (La.10/16/01), 802 So.2d 533 .	2	2003–2018
State v. Duplessis green la · 1971 2 sentences 2017The precedent for such action had been established in State v. Shaffer , 260 La. 605 , 257 So.2d 121 (1971), where the problems were discussed, and State v. Duplessis , 260 La. 644 , 257 So.2d 135 (1971), following the reversal by the United States Supreme Court of our judgment 'insofar as it imposes the death sentence' for a 'Witherspoon' violation. 2017The precedent for such action had been established in State v. Shaffer , 260 La. 605 , 257 So.2d 121 (1971), where the problems were discussed, and State v. Duplessis , 260 La. 644 , 257 So.2d 135 (1971), following the reversal by the United States Supreme Court of our judgment 'insofar as it imposes the death sentence' for a 'Witherspoon' violation.	2	2017–2017
State v. Shaffer green la · 1971 2 sentences 2017The precedent for such action had been established in State v. Shaffer , 260 La. 605 , 257 So.2d 121 (1971), where the problems were discussed, and State v. Duplessis , 260 La. 644 , 257 So.2d 135 (1971), following the reversal by the United States Supreme Court of our judgment 'insofar as it imposes the death sentence' for a 'Witherspoon' violation. 2017The precedent for such action had been established in State v. Shaffer , 260 La. 605 , 257 So.2d 121 (1971), where the problems were discussed, and State v. Duplessis , 260 La. 644 , 257 So.2d 135 (1971), following the reversal by the United States Supreme Court of our judgment 'insofar as it imposes the death sentence' for a 'Witherspoon' violation.	2	2017–2017
State v. George green la · 1979 2 sentences 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979). 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979).	2	1980–1996
State v. Fallon green la · 1974 2 sentences 1978State v. James, 339 So.2d 741 (La.1976); State v. Rester, 309 So.2d 321 (La.1975); State v. Adams, 302 So.2d 599 (La. 1974); State v. Fallon, 290 So.2d 273 (La.1974). 1978State v. James, 339 So.2d 741 (La.1976); State v. Rester, 309 So.2d 321 (La.1975); State v. Adams, 302 So.2d 599 (La. 1974); State v. Fallon, 290 So.2d 273 (La.1974).	2	1976–1978
State v. Adams green la · 1974 2 sentences 1978State v. James, 339 So.2d 741 (La.1976); State v. Rester, 309 So.2d 321 (La.1975); State v. Adams, 302 So.2d 599 (La. 1974); State v. Fallon, 290 So.2d 273 (La.1974). 1978State v. James, 339 So.2d 741 (La.1976); State v. Rester, 309 So.2d 321 (La.1975); State v. Adams, 302 So.2d 599 (La. 1974); State v. Fallon, 290 So.2d 273 (La.1974).	2	1976–1978
State v. Rester green la · 1975 2 sentences 1978State v. James, 339 So.2d 741 (La.1976); State v. Rester, 309 So.2d 321 (La.1975); State v. Adams, 302 So.2d 599 (La. 1974); State v. Fallon, 290 So.2d 273 (La.1974). 1978State v. James, 339 So.2d 741 (La.1976); State v. Rester, 309 So.2d 321 (La.1975); State v. Adams, 302 So.2d 599 (La. 1974); State v. Fallon, 290 So.2d 273 (La.1974).	2	1976–1978
State v. Duncan green la · 2001 1 sentence 2003The "substantial impairment" standard enunciated in Witt was applied to a reverse- Witherspoon challenge by the United States Supreme Court in Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 , 112 S.Ct. 2222 , 119 L.Ed.2d 492 (1992), and by this court in several cases, including Ball, Taylor, Ross, and State v. Duncan, 99-2615 (La.10/16/01), 802 So.2d 533 .	1	2003–2003
State v. Edwards green la · 1981 2 sentences 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979). 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979).	1	1996–1996
State v. Whitt green la · 1981 2 sentences 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979). 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979).	1	1996–1996
Gibson v. United States neutral scotus · 1979 2 sentences 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979). 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979).	1	1996–1996
Morales-Alvira v. Secretary of Health, Education, & Welfare green scotus · 1979 2 sentences 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979). 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979).	1	1996–1996
Incorporated Trustees of the Gospel Worker Society v. United States green scotus · 1982 2 sentences 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979). 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979).	1	1996–1996
Chia v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. green scotus · 1982 2 sentences 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979). 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979).	1	1996–1996
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen green scotus · 1982 2 sentences 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979). 1996State v. Edwards, 406 So.2d 1331 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945 , 102 S.Ct. 2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); State v. Whitt, 404 So.2d 254 (La.1981); State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979).	1	1996–1996
Adams v. Texas green scotus · 1980 2 sentences 1996The appropriate standard for determining when a prospective juror may be excused for cause because of his views on capital punishment is now "whether the juror's views would `prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'" Witt, 469 U.S. at 424 , 105 S.Ct. at 852 . (quoting from Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980)). 1996The appropriate standard for determining when a prospective juror may be excused for cause because of his views on capital punishment is now "whether the juror's views would `prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'" Witt, 469 U.S. at 424 , 105 S.Ct. at 852 . (quoting from Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980)).	1	1996–1996
State v. Skelton green la · 1976 1 sentence 1981State v. Skelton, 340 So.2d 256 (La.1976).	1	1981–1981
State v. Drew green la · 1978 2 sentences 1980State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979); State v. Drew, 360 So.2d 500 (La.1978). 1980State v. George, 371 So.2d 762 (La.1979); State v. Drew, 360 So.2d 500 (La.1978).	1	1980–1980
State v. James green la · 1976 2 sentences 1978State v. James, 339 So.2d 741 (La.1976); State v. Rester, 309 So.2d 321 (La.1975); State v. Adams, 302 So.2d 599 (La. 1974); State v. Fallon, 290 So.2d 273 (La.1974). 1978State v. James, 339 So.2d 741 (La.1976); State v. Rester, 309 So.2d 321 (La.1975); State v. Adams, 302 So.2d 599 (La. 1974); State v. Fallon, 290 So.2d 273 (La.1974).	1	1978–1978
The People v. Bernette green ill · 1970 2 sentences 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284	1	1976–1976
Whan v. State green texcrimapp · 1969	1	1976–1976
State v. Mathis green nj · 1968 2 sentences 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284	1	1976–1976
State v. Wigglesworth green ohio · 1969 2 sentences 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284	1	1976–1976
Atkinson v. North Carolina green scotus · 1971 2 sentences 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284	1	1976–1976
Dies v. Carter green scotus · 1971 2 sentences 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284	1	1976–1976
Hudson v. Louisiana green scotus · 1971	1	1976–1976
Bell v. Patterson green scotus · 1971 2 sentences 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284	1	1976–1976
Quintana v. Texas green scotus · 1971 2 sentences 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284	1	1976–1976
The People v. Speck green ill · 1968 2 sentences 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284 1976In each of the cases cited 232 by the defendant in which the Supreme Court reviewed cases with Witherspoon errors ( Speck v. Illinois, 41 Ill.2d 177 , 242 N.E.2d 208 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2279 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Bernette v. Illinois and Tajra v. Illinois, 45 Ill.2d 227 , 258 N.E.2d 793 (1970), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2290, 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 858 (1971); Mathis v. New Jersey, 52 N.J. 238 , 245 A.2d 20 (1968), rev'd 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2277 , 29 L.Ed.2d 855 (1971); Wigglesworth v. Ohio, 18 Ohio St.2d 171 , 248 N.E.2d 607 (1969), rev'd 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284	1	1976–1976

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:30 (10) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 1 (5) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:30.1 (5) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:27 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:42 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:43 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:567 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 55 (1969–2015) CA 47 (1968–2025) PA 17 (1970–2018) GA 17 (1970–2000) MS 15 (1970–2003) AL 14 (1883–1997) FL 14 (1969–1996) LA 13 (1976–2018) MO 11 (1972–2002) DE 8 (1980–1988) OH 8 (1969–2011) TN 8 (1971–2006) AR 8 (1978–2022) IL 8 (1985–2007) NJ 5 (1971–1991) IN 5 (1982–1999) OK 5 (1982–2013) ID 4 (1991–2023) NM 3 (1983–2005) KY 3 (1972–2010) WA 3 (1971–2012) UT 2 (1980–1986) OR 2 (1990–2019) CT 2 (1996–2004) VA 2 (1985–1995) MD 2 (1985–1994) NY 2 (2004–2004) AZ 2 (1987–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check