Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1970–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Taylor v. Stategreen2 sentences1997In fact, the Supreme Court in Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844, 852 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985) specifically held that the Witherspoon standard “does not require that a juror’s bias be proved with ‘unmistakable clarity.’” See also Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1264 (Miss.) (stating same), cert denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 486 , 136 L.Ed.2d 379 (1996). 1997In fact, the Supreme Court in Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844, 852 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985) specifically held that the Witherspoon standard “does not require that a juror’s bias be proved with ‘unmistakable clarity.’” See also Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1264 (Miss.) (stating same), cert denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 486 , 136 L.Ed.2d 379 (1996). | 3 | 3 |
Williamson v. Stategreen2 sentences1997The proper standard set forth by the Supreme Court, and followed by this Court, is whether the juror’s views on capital punishment would “prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.” Wainwright, 469 U.S. at 424 , 105 S.Ct. at 852 ; Taylor, 672 So.2d at 1264 ; Williamson v. State, 512 So.2d 868, 880-81 (Miss.1987). 1997The proper standard set forth by the Supreme Court, and followed by this Court, is whether the juror’s views on capital punishment would “prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.” Wainwright, 469 U.S. at 424 , 105 S.Ct. at 852 ; Taylor, 672 So.2d at 1264 ; Williamson v. State, 512 So.2d 868, 880-81 (Miss.1987). | 3 | 3 |
Wainwright v. Wittgreen2 sentences1997In fact, the Supreme Court in Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844, 852 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985) specifically held that the Witherspoon standard “does not require that a juror’s bias be proved with ‘unmistakable clarity.’” See also Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1264 (Miss.) (stating same), cert denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 486 , 136 L.Ed.2d 379 (1996). 1997In fact, the Supreme Court in Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844, 852 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985) specifically held that the Witherspoon standard “does not require that a juror’s bias be proved with ‘unmistakable clarity.’” See also Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1264 (Miss.) (stating same), cert denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 486 , 136 L.Ed.2d 379 (1996). | 2 | 7 |
Pinkney v. Stategreen2 sentences1998A successful Witherspoon challenge against a black juror is not relevant, because "... a defendant has no right to a petit jury composed in whole or in part of persons of his own race." Id. at 346-47 ( quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 85 , 106 S.Ct. at 1716-17 ( quoting Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 305 , 25 L.Ed. 664 (1879))). ¶ 32. 1995A successful Witherspoon challenge against a black juror is not relevant, because ". . . a defendant has no right to a petit jury composed in whole or in part of persons of his own race." Id. at 346-47 (quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 85 (quoting Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 305 (1879))). ¶32. | 2 | 3 |
Batson v. Kentuckygreen2 sentences1998A successful Witherspoon challenge against a black juror is not relevant, because "... a defendant has no right to a petit jury composed in whole or in part of persons of his own race." Id. at 346-47 ( quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 85 , 106 S.Ct. at 1716-17 ( quoting Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 305 , 25 L.Ed. 664 (1879))). ¶ 32. 1998A successful Witherspoon challenge against a black juror is not relevant, because "... a defendant has no right to a petit jury composed in whole or in part of persons of his own race." Id. at 346-47 ( quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 85 , 106 S.Ct. at 1716-17 ( quoting Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 305 , 25 L.Ed. 664 (1879))). ¶ 32. | 1 | 3 |
Strauder v. West Virginiared2 sentences1998A successful Witherspoon challenge against a black juror is not relevant, because "... a defendant has no right to a petit jury composed in whole or in part of persons of his own race." Id. at 346-47 ( quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 85 , 106 S.Ct. at 1716-17 ( quoting Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 305 , 25 L.Ed. 664 (1879))). ¶ 32. 1998A successful Witherspoon challenge against a black juror is not relevant, because "... a defendant has no right to a petit jury composed in whole or in part of persons of his own race." Id. at 346-47 ( quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 85 , 106 S.Ct. at 1716-17 ( quoting Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 305 , 25 L.Ed. 664 (1879))). ¶ 32. | 1 | 2 |
Witherspoon v. Illinoisgreen2 sentences1988The Witherspoon rule holds that the death penalty could not be imposed where "the jury that imposed or recommended it was chosen by excluding veniremen for cause simply because they voiced general objections to the death penalty or expressed conscientious or religious scruples against its infliction." Witherspoon, 391 U.S. at 522 , 88 S.Ct. at 1777 , 20 L.Ed.2d at 785 (1968). 1988The Witherspoon rule holds that the death penalty could not be imposed where "the jury that imposed or recommended it was chosen by excluding veniremen for cause simply because they voiced general objections to the death penalty or expressed conscientious or religious scruples against its infliction." Witherspoon, 391 U.S. at 522 , 88 S.Ct. at 1777 , 20 L.Ed.2d at 785 (1968). | 1 | 2 |
White v. Stategreen1 sentence1994However, in Irving v. State, 498 So.2d 305, 311 (Miss. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1986 , 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987), this Court found that the reverse- Witherspoon issue was not so novel that a defendant could raise it on PCR although he had not raised it on direct appeal. [11] Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). [12] The prosecutor said he would accept the blame if this discovery had not been sent, although he felt there still would be no prejudice to Duplantis because neither the memorandum nor the discovery of November 1, 1991 impeached Kn | 1 | 1 |
Abram v. Stategreen1 sentence1994However, in Irving v. State, 498 So.2d 305, 311 (Miss. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1986 , 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987), this Court found that the reverse- Witherspoon issue was not so novel that a defendant could raise it on PCR although he had not raised it on direct appeal. [11] Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). [12] The prosecutor said he would accept the blame if this discovery had not been sent, although he felt there still would be no prejudice to Duplantis because neither the memorandum nor the discovery of November 1, 1991 impeached Kn | 1 | 1 |
Irving v. Stategreen1 sentence1994However, in Irving v. State, 498 So.2d 305, 311 (Miss. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1986 , 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987), this Court found that the reverse- Witherspoon issue was not so novel that a defendant could raise it on PCR although he had not raised it on direct appeal. [11] Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). [12] The prosecutor said he would accept the blame if this discovery had not been sent, although he felt there still would be no prejudice to Duplantis because neither the memorandum nor the discovery of November 1, 1991 impeached Kn | 1 | 1 |
Reddix v. Stategreen1 sentence1994However, in Irving v. State, 498 So.2d 305, 311 (Miss. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1986 , 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987), this Court found that the reverse- Witherspoon issue was not so novel that a defendant could raise it on PCR although he had not raised it on direct appeal. [11] Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). [12] The prosecutor said he would accept the blame if this discovery had not been sent, although he felt there still would be no prejudice to Duplantis because neither the memorandum nor the discovery of November 1, 1991 impeached Kn | 1 | 1 |
Bullock v. Stategreen1 sentence1994However, in Irving v. State, 498 So.2d 305, 311 (Miss. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1986 , 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987), this Court found that the reverse- Witherspoon issue was not so novel that a defendant could raise it on PCR although he had not raised it on direct appeal. [11] Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). [12] The prosecutor said he would accept the blame if this discovery had not been sent, although he felt there still would be no prejudice to Duplantis because neither the memorandum nor the discovery of November 1, 1991 impeached Kn | 1 | 1 |
Enmund v. Floridagreen2 sentences1994However, in Irving v. State, 498 So.2d 305, 311 (Miss. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1986 , 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987), this Court found that the reverse- Witherspoon issue was not so novel that a defendant could raise it on PCR although he had not raised it on direct appeal. [11] Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). [12] The prosecutor said he would accept the blame if this discovery had not been sent, although he felt there still would be no prejudice to Duplantis because neither the memorandum nor the discovery of November 1, 1991 impeached Kn 1994However, in Irving v. State, 498 So.2d 305, 311 (Miss. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1986 , 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987), this Court found that the reverse- Witherspoon issue was not so novel that a defendant could raise it on PCR although he had not raised it on direct appeal. [11] Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). [12] The prosecutor said he would accept the blame if this discovery had not been sent, although he felt there still would be no prejudice to Duplantis because neither the memorandum nor the discovery of November 1, 1991 impeached Kn | 1 | 1 |
Lockett v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Wainwright, 469 U.S. at 424-25 , 105 S.Ct. at 852-53 , 83 L.Ed.2d at 851-53 ; Pinkney v. State, 538 So.2d 329, 345 (Miss. 1988) (judgment vacated and case remanded in light of Clemons v. Mississippi, 494 U.S. 738 , 110 S.Ct. 1441 , 108 L.Ed.2d 725 (1990); Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d 1317, 1335 (Miss. 1987); Fuselier v. State, 468 So.2d 45, 53-54 (Miss. 1985). 1992Wainwright, 469 U.S. at 424-25 , 105 S.Ct. at 852-53 , 83 L.Ed.2d at 851-53 ; Pinkney v. State, 538 So.2d 329, 345 (Miss. 1988) (judgment vacated and case remanded in light of Clemons v. Mississippi, 494 U.S. 738 , 110 S.Ct. 1441 , 108 L.Ed.2d 725 (1990); Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d 1317, 1335 (Miss. 1987); Fuselier v. State, 468 So.2d 45, 53-54 (Miss. 1985). | 1 | 1 |
Fuselier v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Wainwright, 469 U.S. at 424-25 , 105 S.Ct. at 852-53 , 83 L.Ed.2d at 851-53 ; Pinkney v. State, 538 So.2d 329, 345 (Miss. 1988) (judgment vacated and case remanded in light of Clemons v. Mississippi, 494 U.S. 738 , 110 S.Ct. 1441 , 108 L.Ed.2d 725 (1990); Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d 1317, 1335 (Miss. 1987); Fuselier v. State, 468 So.2d 45, 53-54 (Miss. 1985). 1992Wainwright, 469 U.S. at 424-25 , 105 S.Ct. at 852-53 , 83 L.Ed.2d at 851-53 ; Pinkney v. State, 538 So.2d 329, 345 (Miss. 1988) (judgment vacated and case remanded in light of Clemons v. Mississippi, 494 U.S. 738 , 110 S.Ct. 1441 , 108 L.Ed.2d 725 (1990); Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d 1317, 1335 (Miss. 1987); Fuselier v. State, 468 So.2d 45, 53-54 (Miss. 1985). | 1 | 1 |
Tokman v. Stategreen2 sentences1984See, e.g., Wilcher v. State, 455 So.2d 727, 733 (Miss. 1984); Dufour v. State, 453 So.2d 337, 341-345 (Miss. 1984); Cannaday v. State, 455 So.2d 713, 719 (Miss. 1984); Williams v. State, 445 So.2d 798, 805 (Miss. 1984); Tokman v. State, 435 So.2d 664, 667 (Miss. 1983); Evans v. State, 422 So.2d 737, 739-741 (Miss. 1982). 1984See, e.g., Wilcher v. State, 455 So.2d 727, 733 (Miss. 1984); Dufour v. State, 453 So.2d 337, 341-345 (Miss. 1984); Cannaday v. State, 455 So.2d 713, 719 (Miss. 1984); Williams v. State, 445 So.2d 798, 805 (Miss. 1984); Tokman v. State, 435 So.2d 664, 667 (Miss. 1983); Evans v. State, 422 So.2d 737, 739-741 (Miss. 1982). | 1 | 1 |
Evans v. Stategreen2 sentences1984See, e.g., Wilcher v. State, 455 So.2d 727, 733 (Miss. 1984); Dufour v. State, 453 So.2d 337, 341-345 (Miss. 1984); Cannaday v. State, 455 So.2d 713, 719 (Miss. 1984); Williams v. State, 445 So.2d 798, 805 (Miss. 1984); Tokman v. State, 435 So.2d 664, 667 (Miss. 1983); Evans v. State, 422 So.2d 737, 739-741 (Miss. 1982). 1984See, e.g., Wilcher v. State, 455 So.2d 727, 733 (Miss. 1984); Dufour v. State, 453 So.2d 337, 341-345 (Miss. 1984); Cannaday v. State, 455 So.2d 713, 719 (Miss. 1984); Williams v. State, 445 So.2d 798, 805 (Miss. 1984); Tokman v. State, 435 So.2d 664, 667 (Miss. 1983); Evans v. State, 422 So.2d 737, 739-741 (Miss. 1982). | 1 | 1 |
Dufour v. Stategreen2 sentences1984See, e.g., Wilcher v. State, 455 So.2d 727, 733 (Miss. 1984); Dufour v. State, 453 So.2d 337, 341-345 (Miss. 1984); Cannaday v. State, 455 So.2d 713, 719 (Miss. 1984); Williams v. State, 445 So.2d 798, 805 (Miss. 1984); Tokman v. State, 435 So.2d 664, 667 (Miss. 1983); Evans v. State, 422 So.2d 737, 739-741 (Miss. 1982). 1984See, e.g., Wilcher v. State, 455 So.2d 727, 733 (Miss. 1984); Dufour v. State, 453 So.2d 337, 341-345 (Miss. 1984); Cannaday v. State, 455 So.2d 713, 719 (Miss. 1984); Williams v. State, 445 So.2d 798, 805 (Miss. 1984); Tokman v. State, 435 So.2d 664, 667 (Miss. 1983); Evans v. State, 422 So.2d 737, 739-741 (Miss. 1982). | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences1984See, e.g., Wilcher v. State, 455 So.2d 727, 733 (Miss. 1984); Dufour v. State, 453 So.2d 337, 341-345 (Miss. 1984); Cannaday v. State, 455 So.2d 713, 719 (Miss. 1984); Williams v. State, 445 So.2d 798, 805 (Miss. 1984); Tokman v. State, 435 So.2d 664, 667 (Miss. 1983); Evans v. State, 422 So.2d 737, 739-741 (Miss. 1982). 1984See, e.g., Wilcher v. State, 455 So.2d 727, 733 (Miss. 1984); Dufour v. State, 453 So.2d 337, 341-345 (Miss. 1984); Cannaday v. State, 455 So.2d 713, 719 (Miss. 1984); Williams v. State, 445 So.2d 798, 805 (Miss. 1984); Tokman v. State, 435 So.2d 664, 667 (Miss. 1983); Evans v. State, 422 So.2d 737, 739-741 (Miss. 1982). | 1 | 1 |
Wilcher v. Stategreen2 sentences1984See, e.g., Wilcher v. State, 455 So.2d 727, 733 (Miss. 1984); Dufour v. State, 453 So.2d 337, 341-345 (Miss. 1984); Cannaday v. State, 455 So.2d 713, 719 (Miss. 1984); Williams v. State, 445 So.2d 798, 805 (Miss. 1984); Tokman v. State, 435 So.2d 664, 667 (Miss. 1983); Evans v. State, 422 So.2d 737, 739-741 (Miss. 1982). 1984See, e.g., Wilcher v. State, 455 So.2d 727, 733 (Miss. 1984); Dufour v. State, 453 So.2d 337, 341-345 (Miss. 1984); Cannaday v. State, 455 So.2d 713, 719 (Miss. 1984); Williams v. State, 445 So.2d 798, 805 (Miss. 1984); Tokman v. State, 435 So.2d 664, 667 (Miss. 1983); Evans v. State, 422 So.2d 737, 739-741 (Miss. 1982). | 1 | 1 |
Cannaday v. Stategreen2 sentences1984See, e.g., Wilcher v. State, 455 So.2d 727, 733 (Miss. 1984); Dufour v. State, 453 So.2d 337, 341-345 (Miss. 1984); Cannaday v. State, 455 So.2d 713, 719 (Miss. 1984); Williams v. State, 445 So.2d 798, 805 (Miss. 1984); Tokman v. State, 435 So.2d 664, 667 (Miss. 1983); Evans v. State, 422 So.2d 737, 739-741 (Miss. 1982). 1984See, e.g., Wilcher v. State, 455 So.2d 727, 733 (Miss. 1984); Dufour v. State, 453 So.2d 337, 341-345 (Miss. 1984); Cannaday v. State, 455 So.2d 713, 719 (Miss. 1984); Williams v. State, 445 So.2d 798, 805 (Miss. 1984); Tokman v. State, 435 So.2d 664, 667 (Miss. 1983); Evans v. State, 422 So.2d 737, 739-741 (Miss. 1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Adams v. Texas
green
2 sentences2003The U.S. *826 Supreme Court has clarified the Witherspoon rule: We therefore take this opportunity to clarify our decision in Witherspoon , and to reaffirm the above-quoted standard from Adams [v. State, 448 U.S. 38 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980)] as the proper standard for determining when a prospective juror may be excluded for cause because of his or her views on capital punishment. 2003The U.S. *826 Supreme Court has clarified the Witherspoon rule: We therefore take this opportunity to clarify our decision in Witherspoon , and to reaffirm the above-quoted standard from Adams [v. State, 448 U.S. 38 , 100 S.Ct. 2521 , 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980)] as the proper standard for determining when a prospective juror may be excluded for cause because of his or her views on capital punishment. | 4 | 1983–2003 |
Everhart v. Nevada
green
2 sentences1997In fact, the Supreme Court in Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844, 852 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985) specifically held that the Witherspoon standard “does not require that a juror’s bias be proved with ‘unmistakable clarity.’” See also Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1264 (Miss.) (stating same), cert denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 486 , 136 L.Ed.2d 379 (1996). 1997In fact, the Supreme Court in Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844, 852 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985) specifically held that the Witherspoon standard “does not require that a juror’s bias be proved with ‘unmistakable clarity.’” See also Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1264 (Miss.) (stating same), cert denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 486 , 136 L.Ed.2d 379 (1996). | 3 | 1995–1997 |
Taylor v. Mississippi
green
2 sentences1997In fact, the Supreme Court in Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844, 852 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985) specifically held that the Witherspoon standard “does not require that a juror’s bias be proved with ‘unmistakable clarity.’” See also Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1264 (Miss.) (stating same), cert denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 486 , 136 L.Ed.2d 379 (1996). 1997In fact, the Supreme Court in Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844, 852 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985) specifically held that the Witherspoon standard “does not require that a juror’s bias be proved with ‘unmistakable clarity.’” See also Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1264 (Miss.) (stating same), cert denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 486 , 136 L.Ed.2d 379 (1996). | 2 | 1997–1997 |
West v. State
green
1 sentence1994However, in Irving v. State, 498 So.2d 305, 311 (Miss. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1986 , 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987), this Court found that the reverse- Witherspoon issue was not so novel that a defendant could raise it on PCR although he had not raised it on direct appeal. [11] Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). [12] The prosecutor said he would accept the blame if this discovery had not been sent, although he felt there still would be no prejudice to Duplantis because neither the memorandum nor the discovery of November 1, 1991 impeached Kn | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Central Machinery Co. v. Arizona
green
1 sentence1994However, in Irving v. State, 498 So.2d 305, 311 (Miss. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1986 , 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987), this Court found that the reverse- Witherspoon issue was not so novel that a defendant could raise it on PCR although he had not raised it on direct appeal. [11] Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). [12] The prosecutor said he would accept the blame if this discovery had not been sent, although he felt there still would be no prejudice to Duplantis because neither the memorandum nor the discovery of November 1, 1991 impeached Kn | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Clemons v. Mississippi
green
2 sentences1992Wainwright, 469 U.S. at 424-25 , 105 S.Ct. at 852-53 , 83 L.Ed.2d at 851-53 ; Pinkney v. State, 538 So.2d 329, 345 (Miss. 1988) (judgment vacated and case remanded in light of Clemons v. Mississippi, 494 U.S. 738 , 110 S.Ct. 1441 , 108 L.Ed.2d 725 (1990); Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d 1317, 1335 (Miss. 1987); Fuselier v. State, 468 So.2d 45, 53-54 (Miss. 1985). 1992Wainwright, 469 U.S. at 424-25 , 105 S.Ct. at 852-53 , 83 L.Ed.2d at 851-53 ; Pinkney v. State, 538 So.2d 329, 345 (Miss. 1988) (judgment vacated and case remanded in light of Clemons v. Mississippi, 494 U.S. 738 , 110 S.Ct. 1441 , 108 L.Ed.2d 725 (1990); Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d 1317, 1335 (Miss. 1987); Fuselier v. State, 468 So.2d 45, 53-54 (Miss. 1985). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Davis v. Georgia
green
2 sentences1984Davis v. Georgia, 429 U.S. 122 , 97 S.Ct. 399 , 50 L.Ed.2d 339 (1976), holds that exclusion of just one prospective juror in violation of Witherspoon is sufficient to vitiate a death sentence. 1984Davis v. Georgia, 429 U.S. 122 , 97 S.Ct. 399 , 50 L.Ed.2d 339 (1976), holds that exclusion of just one prospective juror in violation of Witherspoon is sufficient to vitiate a death sentence. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Bumper v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences1970Rouse v. State, 222 So.2d 145 (Miss. 1969); Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 , 88 S.Ct. 1788 , 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968). 1970Rouse v. State, 222 So.2d 145 (Miss. 1969); Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 , 88 S.Ct. 1788 , 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968). | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Rouse v. State
green
2 sentences1970Rouse v. State, 222 So.2d 145 (Miss. 1969); Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 , 88 S.Ct. 1788 , 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968). 1970Rouse v. State, 222 So.2d 145 (Miss. 1969); Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 , 88 S.Ct. 1788 , 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968). | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.