13 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1939–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shaw v. Shawgreen1 sentence2003In addition, this award requires a hearing before the judgment could be executed.' “ ‘A conditional judgment ... is one whose enforcement is dependent upon the performance of future acts by a litigant and which is to be annulled if default occurs[.]’ ” Shaw v. Shaw, 951 S.W.2d 746, 750 (Mo.App.1997) (quoting Burch v. Burch, 805 S.W.2d 841, 348 (Mo.App.1991)). | 1 | 1 |
Oberreiter v. Fullbright Truckinggreen1 sentence2003In Oberreiter v. Fullbright Trucking, 24 S.W.3d 727, 729 (Mo.App.2000) (“Oberreiter II”), this Court noted that there were no specific provisions in the Workers’ Compensation Act concerning dismissals without prejudice. | 1 | 1 |
Cmd v. Jrdgreen1 sentence1993The decree awarded her $18,000 “retroactive maintenance.” On appeal by the husband, the court held the award was error, explaining that the maintenance statute (then § 452.335, RSMo 1978) spoke prospectively, not retrospectively. 710 S.W.2d at 479 [12]. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gattenby v. Treasurer of the State-Custodian of the Second Injury Fund
green
1 sentence2020The Commission's Award applied the analysis of Gattenby v. Treasurer of Missouri-Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, 516 S.W.3d 859 (Mo. App. W.D. 2017), which was overturned by Cosby. 12 applied Subsection 2 even though Cosby requires the application of Subsection 3. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Williams v. Tyson Foods Inc.
green
1 sentence2018Williams , 530 S.W.3d at 524 n.3. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Jennings v. Station Casino St. Charles
green
1 sentence2016Id. at 558 . *321 This argument was raised before the Commission, and the Commission found that there was, in fact, additional significant evidence presented at the final award hearing to support the modification of the temporary award. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Jackson v. Stahl Specialty Co.
green
2 sentences2012Conversely, the Commission’s order “remains tentative, provisional, contingent^ or] subject to recall, revision or reconsideration by the commission.” Id. 2012In that posture, the determination of the commutation issue is part of the award on the claim and, therefore, the Commission’s order did not “[dispose] of the entire controversy between the parties to the claim[,]” nor did it “[arrive] at a terminal, complete resolution of the case before it.” See Jackson, 310 S.W.3d at 710 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Barnes v. State
green
1 sentence2009Id. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Brown v. Color Coating, Inc.
green
1 sentence2005Employer cites such cases as Brown v. Color Coating, Inc., 867 S.W.2d 242 (Mo.App.1993), for the general rule that a judgment must be sufficiently certain in its terms to be susceptible of enforcement without resort to external proof or another hearing. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Temple Stephens Co. v. Westenhaver
green
1 sentence1990Temple Stephens, supra, 776 S.W.2d at 442 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Arkansas-Missouri Power Company v. Hamlin
green
1 sentence1957And it has been said that to instruct the jury to allow interest on the excess of value found by them over the award is error because it presupposes or suggests that the amount of damage is to be increased.” Arkansas-Missouri Power Co', v. Hamlin, 288 S.W.2d 14, 18 . | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Sweet v. Maupin
green
1 sentence1957A general statement which does not distinctly designate the ex-cessiveness of the award as the error relied upon will not serve to preserve such excessiveness as an assignment of error on appeal. 3 Am.Jur., Appeal and Error, sec. 401, p. 132; 4 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 388, p. 838; Tynes v. Terrill, 19 S.W.2d 505 , supra; Spickard v. Continental Casualty Co., 228 Mo.App., 233 , 64 S.W.2d 734 ; Marsters v. Bray, Mo.Sup., 85 S.W.2d 479 , 481; Bond v. Williams, 279 Mo. 215 , 214 S.W. 202, 206 , 16 A.L.R. 755 ; Sweet v. Maupin, 65 Mo. 65, 68 . | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Bond v. Williams
green
2 sentences1957A general statement which does not distinctly designate the ex-cessiveness of the award as the error relied upon will not serve to preserve such excessiveness as an assignment of error on appeal. 3 Am.Jur., Appeal and Error, sec. 401, p. 132; 4 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 388, p. 838; Tynes v. Terrill, 19 S.W.2d 505 , supra; Spickard v. Continental Casualty Co., 228 Mo.App., 233 , 64 S.W.2d 734 ; Marsters v. Bray, Mo.Sup., 85 S.W.2d 479 , 481; Bond v. Williams, 279 Mo. 215 , 214 S.W. 202, 206 , 16 A.L.R. 755 ; Sweet v. Maupin, 65 Mo. 65, 68 . 1957A general statement which does not distinctly designate the ex-cessiveness of the award as the error relied upon will not serve to preserve such excessiveness as an assignment of error on appeal. 3 Am.Jur., Appeal and Error, sec. 401, p. 132; 4 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 388, p. 838; Tynes v. Terrill, 19 S.W.2d 505 , supra; Spickard v. Continental Casualty Co., 228 Mo.App., 233 , 64 S.W.2d 734 ; Marsters v. Bray, Mo.Sup., 85 S.W.2d 479 , 481; Bond v. Williams, 279 Mo. 215 , 214 S.W. 202, 206 , 16 A.L.R. 755 ; Sweet v. Maupin, 65 Mo. 65, 68 . | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Spickard v. Continental Casualty Co.
green
2 sentences1957A general statement which does not distinctly designate the ex-cessiveness of the award as the error relied upon will not serve to preserve such excessiveness as an assignment of error on appeal. 3 Am.Jur., Appeal and Error, sec. 401, p. 132; 4 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 388, p. 838; Tynes v. Terrill, 19 S.W.2d 505 , supra; Spickard v. Continental Casualty Co., 228 Mo.App., 233 , 64 S.W.2d 734 ; Marsters v. Bray, Mo.Sup., 85 S.W.2d 479 , 481; Bond v. Williams, 279 Mo. 215 , 214 S.W. 202, 206 , 16 A.L.R. 755 ; Sweet v. Maupin, 65 Mo. 65, 68 . 1957A general statement which does not distinctly designate the ex-cessiveness of the award as the error relied upon will not serve to preserve such excessiveness as an assignment of error on appeal. 3 Am.Jur., Appeal and Error, sec. 401, p. 132; 4 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 388, p. 838; Tynes v. Terrill, 19 S.W.2d 505 , supra; Spickard v. Continental Casualty Co., 228 Mo.App., 233 , 64 S.W.2d 734 ; Marsters v. Bray, Mo.Sup., 85 S.W.2d 479 , 481; Bond v. Williams, 279 Mo. 215 , 214 S.W. 202, 206 , 16 A.L.R. 755 ; Sweet v. Maupin, 65 Mo. 65, 68 . | 1 | 1957–1957 |
State Ex Rel. Wors v. Hostetter
green
2 sentences1939Wors v. Hostetter, 343 Mo. 945 , 124 S.W.2d 1072 . 1939Wors v. Hostetter, 343 Mo. 945 , 124 S.W.2d 1072 . | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.