award hearing in Michigan

1985The citation of Deziel by the WCAB in the instant case appears, in context, to relate to the portion of Deziel recognizing the difficulty in determining "the causal significance of any one factor,” and that nevertheless compensation may be awarded if there is a work-related factor. 21 IV In Selk v Detroit Plastic Products (On Resubmission), 419 Mich 32 ; 348 NW2d 652 (1984), this Court held'that the increase in the interest rate effected by 1981 PA 194 22 from 5% to 12% per annum is retroactive to the date each weekly payment of workers’ compensation benefits was due if the compensation is pai

1985The citation of Deziel by the WCAB in the instant case appears, in context, to relate to the portion of Deziel recognizing the difficulty in determining "the causal significance of any one factor,” and that nevertheless compensation may be awarded if there is a work-related factor. 21 IV In Selk v Detroit Plastic Products (On Resubmission), 419 Mich 32 ; 348 NW2d 652 (1984), this Court held'that the increase in the interest rate effected by 1981 PA 194 22 from 5% to 12% per annum is retroactive to the date each weekly payment of workers’ compensation benefits was due if the compensation is pai

2023Detroit Auto Inter-Ins Exch v Gavin, 416 Mich 407, 441-443 ; 331 NW2d 418 (1982).

2023Detroit Auto Inter-Ins Exch v Gavin, 416 Mich 407, 441-443 ; 331 NW2d 418 (1982).

1984Selk v Detroit Plastic Products, 419 Mich 1, 15 ; 345 NW2d 184 (1984).

1984Selk v Detroit Plastic Products, 419 Mich 1, 15 ; 345 NW2d 184 (1984).

2022In 36th Dist Court, 295 Mich App at 508 , this Court stated that “[l]abor arbitration falls within the realm of the common law . . . where judicial review of an arbitration is limited . . . .” (Citations omitted.) In the same decision, however, this Court cited Gavin without exception for 2 Ferndale Ed Ass’n v Sch Dist for the City of Ferndale #1, 67 Mich App 637 ; 242 NW2d 478 (1976). -5- the principle that “[a] court may also review an arbitrator’s award for an error of law that clearly appears on the face of the award or in the reasons stated by the arbitrator for the decision.” Id. at 509.

2021Alternatively, if we hold . . . that an award of contractual fees is to be treated different than other instances of “fees, costs, and interest” incurred by a party because it is an award on a claim for general damages, then the district court’s fee award would be subject to that court’s subject- matter jurisdiction and the $25,000.00 cap. [Id. at ___; slip op at 4.] This Court concluded that “contractual attorney fees are an element of general damages and are to be included in the amount-in-controversy calculation for purposes of a district court’s jurisdiction.” 1 MCL 15.261 et seq. -3- Id.

1990As noted by our Supreme Court in Hiltz v Phil’s Quality Market, 417 Mich 335 ; 337 NW2d 237 (1983), any seventy percent benefits paid to the employee during the pendency of an appeal of a referee’s award are considered to be "compensation” for purposes of the above statute.

1990As noted by our Supreme Court in Hiltz v Phil’s Quality Market, 417 Mich 335 ; 337 NW2d 237 (1983), any seventy percent benefits paid to the employee during the pendency of an appeal of a referee’s award are considered to be "compensation” for purposes of the above statute.

1984Until December 31, 1981, the effective interest rate was 5%. *8 Wilson v. Doehler-Jarvis Division of National Lead Co, 358 Mich 510 ; 100 NW2d 226 (1960).

1984Until December 31, 1981, the effective interest rate was 5%. *8 Wilson v. Doehler-Jarvis Division of National Lead Co, 358 Mich 510 ; 100 NW2d 226 (1960).

1983MCL 418.801(5); MSA 17.237(801)(5), which became effective January 1, 1982, reads: "When weekly compensation is paid pursuant to an award of a hearing referee, the board, or a court, interest on the compensation shall be paid at the rate of 12% per annum from the date each payment was due, until paid.” In Selk v Detroit Plastic Products, 120 Mich App 135, 143 ; 328 NW2d 15 (1982), lv gtd 417 Mich 934 (1983), this Court held that although the effective date of the above statute was January 1, 1982, "The amendment clearly and unambiguously requires that for all awards made after January 1, 1982,

1983MCL 418.801(5); MSA 17.237(801)(5), which became effective January 1, 1982, reads: "When weekly compensation is paid pursuant to an award of a hearing referee, the board, or a court, interest on the compensation shall be paid at the rate of 12% per annum from the date each payment was due, until paid.” In Selk v Detroit Plastic Products, 120 Mich App 135, 143 ; 328 NW2d 15 (1982), lv gtd 417 Mich 934 (1983), this Court held that although the effective date of the above statute was January 1, 1982, "The amendment clearly and unambiguously requires that for all awards made after January 1, 1982,

1942Appellant claims that the award was in error because the petition was not filed within the 500-week period, citing the Kiviniemi *Page 298 Case and Willard v. Globe Housewrecking Co. , 294 Mich. 42 .

1942Buzzn v. Muncey Cartage Co., 248 Mich. 64 ; Hajduk v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc., 268 Mich. 220 ; Weaver v. Antrim Iron Co., 274 Mich. 493 .

1942Buzzn v. Muncey Cartage Co., 248 Mich. 64 ; Hajduk v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc., 268 Mich. 220 ; Weaver v. Antrim Iron Co., 274 Mich. 493 .

1942Buzzn v. Muncey Cartage Co., 248 Mich. 64 ; Hajduk v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc., 268 Mich. 220 ; Weaver v. Antrim Iron Co., 274 Mich. 493 .

1935Runnels v. Allied Engineers, Inc., 270 Mich. 153 .