13 North Carolina opinions name it 3 courts 1922–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Redevelopment Com'n of Greenville v. Hannafordgreen1 sentence2014See, e.g., Redevelopment Com’n of Greenville v. Hannaford, 29 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Turner v. Masiasgreen1 sentence2011App. 213, 217 , 243 S.E.2d 401, 404 (1978).” We hold that if the Agreement requires automatic and complete closure of the proceedings in this matter, then the Agreement is in violation of public policy — the qualified public right of access to civil court proceedings guaranteed by Article I, Section 18. | 1 | 1 |
Gleason v. Leadership Housing, Inc.green1 sentence2009The appellate court “assum[ed] for the purpose of [its] decision that the agreement was; in fact, in violation of the Statute of Frauds” and held that the developer was “estopped to contest the validity of the agreement under the doctrine of equitable estoppel.” Id. at 104. | 1 | 1 |
Stegall v. Stegallgreen1 sentence1999See Stegall v. Stegall, 100 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Carolina Mills Lumber Co. v. Huffmangreen1 sentence1991See, Howell v. Landry, 96 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Howell v. Landry
green
1 sentence2008Id. (citing Howell, 96 N.C. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Prevatte v. Prevatte
green
1 sentence2008Id. (citing Howell, 96 N.C. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Blount v. Blount
green
1 sentence1986Id. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Britt v. Allen
neutral
1 sentence1975This case was reviewed on appeal by this Court in 21 N.C. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Bailey v. Bailey.
neutral
2 sentences1961Bailey v. Bailey, *194 127 N.C. 474 , 37 S.E. 502 ; 26 Am. 1961Bailey v. Bailey, *194 127 N.C. 474 , 37 S.E. 502 ; 26 Am. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Winders v. Hill.
green
2 sentences1930Michael v. Foil , 100 N.C. 178 , 191 ; Winders v. Hill , 141 N.C. 694 , 704 . 1930Michael v. Foil, 100 N. C., 178, 191 ; Winders v. Hill, 141 N. C., 694, 704 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Michael v. . Foil
green
2 sentences1930Michael v. Foil , 100 N.C. 178 , 191 ; Winders v. Hill , 141 N.C. 694 , 704 . 1930Michael v. Foil, 100 N. C., 178, 191 ; Winders v. Hill, 141 N. C., 694, 704 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Phosphate Co. v. . Johnson
green
1 sentence1926In Phosphate Co. v. Johnson, 188 N. C., 419 , we approved the principle, as applicable to these statutes, that if an act is prohibited by statute, an agreement in violation of the statute is void, although the act is not penalized, for it is the prohibition, and not the penalty, which makes the act illegal. | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Smithfield Improvement Co. v. Coley-Bardin
neutral
1 sentence1925Improvement Co. v. Coley-Bardin, supra. To forestall the lessor’s liability in case it caused damage to the leased premises by flood or otherwise, there was inserted in the agreement a clause exempting it from such liability by releasing all claims and damages, growing out of the ponding of the water or the construction, maintenance, or operation of the dams. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Dunbar v. Dunbar
green
1 sentence1922Dunbar v. Dunbar, 180 Mass., 170 ; Dickerson v. Dickerson, 19 Ga. App., 269 ; 6 R. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Dickerson v. Dickerson
green
1 sentence1922Dunbar v. Dunbar, 180 Mass., 170 ; Dickerson v. Dickerson, 19 Ga. App., 269 ; 6 R. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.