Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2023 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Village of Chatham v. County of Sangamongreen2 sentences2023See Village of Chatham, 216 Ill. 2d at 417 (we must uphold an ordinance’s validity if reasonably possible); cf. Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. City of Chicago, 89 Ill. 2d 45, 75-76 (1982) - 13 - No. 1-21-1513 (severability will not be found if it broadens the scope of the ordinance or alters it in a manner contrary to the legislative intent). ¶ 28 Therefore, the primary residence rule and its narrow exception are not so mutually connected or interdependent on each other that the city wouldn’t have passed the former without the latter. 2023See Village of Chatham, 216 Ill. 2d at 417 (we must uphold an ordinance’s validity if reasonably possible); cf. Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. City of Chicago, 89 Ill. 2d 45, 75-76 (1982) (severability will not be found if it broadens the scope of the ordinance or alters it in a manner contrary to the legislative intent). ¶ 27 Therefore, the primary residence rule and its narrow exception are not so mutually connected or interdependent on each other that the city would not have passed the former without the latter. | 2 | 2 |
Glisson v. City of Mariongreen2 sentences2023Proc. 20303, 20307 (September 9, 2020). 9 No. 1-22-1705 were successful in striking the challenged provisions, the primary residence rule would bar the relief he seeks: approval of his shared housing unit registration. ¶ 20 To establish standing in Illinois, a party must claim an injury that is “(i) distinct and palpable; (ii) fairly traceable to the defendant’s actions; and (iii) substantially likely to be prevented or redressed by the grant of the requested relief.” Glisson v. City of Marion, 188 Ill. 2d 211, 221 (1999). 2023Glisson, 188 Ill. 2d at 221 . ¶ 21 Henderson claims the primary residence rule is satisfied because he lives next door to the subject property, but Henderson misinterprets the factor which addresses the degree to which the sought adjustment “varies from the prevailing limitations.” § 4-14-100(a)(2). | 2 | 2 |
Nordlinger v. Hahngreen2 sentences2023Second, plaintiffs do not challenge the court’s findings below that the City has a legitimate interest in local neighborhood preservation, continuity and stability (see Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1, 12 (1992)), and that the primary residence rule is rationally related to protecting that interest, including safeguarding residential neighborhoods in particular. 2023Second, plaintiffs do not challenge the court’s findings below that the City has a legitimate interest in local neighborhood preservation, continuity, and stability (see Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1, 12 (1992)) and that the primary residence rule is rationally related to protecting that interest, including safeguarding residential neighborhoods in particular. | 2 | 2 |
Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. City of Chicagogreen2 sentences2023See Village of Chatham, 216 Ill. 2d at 417 (we must uphold an ordinance’s validity if reasonably possible); cf. Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. City of Chicago, 89 Ill. 2d 45, 75-76 (1982) - 13 - No. 1-21-1513 (severability will not be found if it broadens the scope of the ordinance or alters it in a manner contrary to the legislative intent). ¶ 28 Therefore, the primary residence rule and its narrow exception are not so mutually connected or interdependent on each other that the city wouldn’t have passed the former without the latter. 2023See Village of Chatham, 216 Ill. 2d at 417 (we must uphold an ordinance’s validity if reasonably possible); cf. Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. City of Chicago, 89 Ill. 2d 45, 75-76 (1982) (severability will not be found if it broadens the scope of the ordinance or alters it in a manner contrary to the legislative intent). ¶ 27 Therefore, the primary residence rule and its narrow exception are not so mutually connected or interdependent on each other that the city would not have passed the former without the latter. | 2 | 2 |
NORTHERN ILL. HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION v. County of Du Pagegreen2 sentences2023See Northern Illinois Home Builders Association, Inc. v. County of Du Page, 165 Ill. 2d 25, 48-49 (1995); Rivera, 2021 IL App (1st) 192188, ¶ 28 . 2023See Northern Illinois Home Builders Ass’n, 165 Ill. 2d at 48-49 ; Rivera, 2021 IL App (1st) 192188, ¶ 28 . | 2 | 2 |
People v. Swierczgreen2 sentences2005See People v. Swiercz, 104 Ill. 2005See People v. Swiercz, 104 Ill.App.3d 733, 736-37 , 60 Ill.Dec. 1 , 432 N.E.2d 900 (1982). | 2 | 2 |
City of Champaign v. Torresgreen1 sentence2023Thus, an “officer’s warrantless, nonconsensual, and forcible entry into a person’s residence in violation of the fourth amendment will not be considered an ‘authorized act.’ ” City of Champaign v. Torres, 214 Ill. 2d 234, 243 (2005). ¶ 23 However, section 31-1 must be read in conjunction with section 7-7 of the Criminal Code of 2012, which provides: “A person is not authorized to use force to resist an arrest which he knows is being made *** by a peace officer ***, even if he believes that the arrest is unlawful and the arrest in fact is unlawful.” 720 ILCS 5/7-7 (West 2020). ¶ 24 “It appears | 1 | 1 |
People v. Lockengreen1 sentence2023Thus, an “officer’s warrantless, nonconsensual, and forcible entry into a person’s residence in violation of the fourth amendment will not be considered an ‘authorized act.’ ” City of Champaign v. Torres, 214 Ill. 2d 234, 243 (2005). ¶ 23 However, section 31-1 must be read in conjunction with section 7-7 of the Criminal Code of 2012, which provides: “A person is not authorized to use force to resist an arrest which he knows is being made *** by a peace officer ***, even if he believes that the arrest is unlawful and the arrest in fact is unlawful.” 720 ILCS 5/7-7 (West 2020). ¶ 24 “It appears | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rivera v. Bank of New York Mellon
green
2 sentences2023See Northern Illinois Home Builders Association, Inc. v. County of Du Page, 165 Ill. 2d 25, 48-49 (1995); Rivera, 2021 IL App (1st) 192188, ¶ 28 . 2023See Northern Illinois Home Builders Ass’n, 165 Ill. 2d at 48-49 ; Rivera, 2021 IL App (1st) 192188, ¶ 28 . | 2 | 2023–2023 |
Fagiano v. Police Board of City of Chicago
green
2 sentences2010Fagiano, 98 Ill. 2d at 285 , 456 N.E.2d at 30 . 2010Fagiano, 98 Ill. 2d at 285 , 456 N.E.2d at 30 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Coffey v. Board of Election Commissioners
green
2 sentences1994The opinions of our supreme court dealing with the definition of residence have basically related to voters. ( Kreitz, 125 Ill. at 195 , 17 N.E. at 253 ; Park, 374 Ill. at 43 , 27 N.E.2d at 842 ; Coffey v. Board of Election Commissioners (1940), 375 Ill. 385,387-88 , 31 N.E.2d 588, 589 ; Clark, 377 Ill. at 426-27 , 36 N.E.2d at 565 ; Messman v. Newman Township High School District No. 150 (1942), 379 Ill. 32, 38-39 , 39 N.E.2d 332, 336 ; Tuthill v. Rendelman (1944), 387 Ill. 321, 341 , 56 N.E.2d 375, 386 ; Stein, 40 Ill.2d at 479-80 , 240 N.E.2d at 669 .) There is no reason to believe a differ 1994The opinions of our supreme court dealing with the definition of residence have basically related to voters. ( Kreitz, 125 Ill. at 195 , 17 N.E. at 253 ; Park, 374 Ill. at 43 , 27 N.E.2d at 842 ; Coffey v. Board of Election Commissioners (1940), 375 Ill. 385,387-88 , 31 N.E.2d 588, 589 ; Clark, 377 Ill. at 426-27 , 36 N.E.2d at 565 ; Messman v. Newman Township High School District No. 150 (1942), 379 Ill. 32, 38-39 , 39 N.E.2d 332, 336 ; Tuthill v. Rendelman (1944), 387 Ill. 321, 341 , 56 N.E.2d 375, 386 ; Stein, 40 Ill.2d at 479-80 , 240 N.E.2d at 669 .) There is no reason to believe a differ | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Clark v. Quick
green
2 sentences1994The opinions of our supreme court dealing with the definition of residence have basically related to voters. ( Kreitz, 125 Ill. at 195 , 17 N.E. at 253 ; Park, 374 Ill. at 43 , 27 N.E.2d at 842 ; Coffey v. Board of Election Commissioners (1940), 375 Ill. 385,387-88 , 31 N.E.2d 588, 589 ; Clark, 377 Ill. at 426-27 , 36 N.E.2d at 565 ; Messman v. Newman Township High School District No. 150 (1942), 379 Ill. 32, 38-39 , 39 N.E.2d 332, 336 ; Tuthill v. Rendelman (1944), 387 Ill. 321, 341 , 56 N.E.2d 375, 386 ; Stein, 40 Ill.2d at 479-80 , 240 N.E.2d at 669 .) There is no reason to believe a differ 1994The opinions of our supreme court dealing with the definition of residence have basically related to voters. ( Kreitz, 125 Ill. at 195 , 17 N.E. at 253 ; Park, 374 Ill. at 43 , 27 N.E.2d at 842 ; Coffey v. Board of Election Commissioners (1940), 375 Ill. 385,387-88 , 31 N.E.2d 588, 589 ; Clark, 377 Ill. at 426-27 , 36 N.E.2d at 565 ; Messman v. Newman Township High School District No. 150 (1942), 379 Ill. 32, 38-39 , 39 N.E.2d 332, 336 ; Tuthill v. Rendelman (1944), 387 Ill. 321, 341 , 56 N.E.2d 375, 386 ; Stein, 40 Ill.2d at 479-80 , 240 N.E.2d at 669 .) There is no reason to believe a differ | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Messman v. Newman Township High School District No. 150
neutral
2 sentences1994The opinions of our supreme court dealing with the definition of residence have basically related to voters. ( Kreitz, 125 Ill. at 195 , 17 N.E. at 253 ; Park, 374 Ill. at 43 , 27 N.E.2d at 842 ; Coffey v. Board of Election Commissioners (1940), 375 Ill. 385,387-88 , 31 N.E.2d 588, 589 ; Clark, 377 Ill. at 426-27 , 36 N.E.2d at 565 ; Messman v. Newman Township High School District No. 150 (1942), 379 Ill. 32, 38-39 , 39 N.E.2d 332, 336 ; Tuthill v. Rendelman (1944), 387 Ill. 321, 341 , 56 N.E.2d 375, 386 ; Stein, 40 Ill.2d at 479-80 , 240 N.E.2d at 669 .) There is no reason to believe a differ 1994The opinions of our supreme court dealing with the definition of residence have basically related to voters. ( Kreitz, 125 Ill. at 195 , 17 N.E. at 253 ; Park, 374 Ill. at 43 , 27 N.E.2d at 842 ; Coffey v. Board of Election Commissioners (1940), 375 Ill. 385,387-88 , 31 N.E.2d 588, 589 ; Clark, 377 Ill. at 426-27 , 36 N.E.2d at 565 ; Messman v. Newman Township High School District No. 150 (1942), 379 Ill. 32, 38-39 , 39 N.E.2d 332, 336 ; Tuthill v. Rendelman (1944), 387 Ill. 321, 341 , 56 N.E.2d 375, 386 ; Stein, 40 Ill.2d at 479-80 , 240 N.E.2d at 669 .) There is no reason to believe a differ | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Park v. Hood
green
2 sentences1994The opinions of our supreme court dealing with the definition of residence have basically related to voters. ( Kreitz, 125 Ill. at 195 , 17 N.E. at 253 ; Park, 374 Ill. at 43 , 27 N.E.2d at 842 ; Coffey v. Board of Election Commissioners (1940), 375 Ill. 385,387-88 , 31 N.E.2d 588, 589 ; Clark, 377 Ill. at 426-27 , 36 N.E.2d at 565 ; Messman v. Newman Township High School District No. 150 (1942), 379 Ill. 32, 38-39 , 39 N.E.2d 332, 336 ; Tuthill v. Rendelman (1944), 387 Ill. 321, 341 , 56 N.E.2d 375, 386 ; Stein, 40 Ill.2d at 479-80 , 240 N.E.2d at 669 .) There is no reason to believe a differ 1994The opinions of our supreme court dealing with the definition of residence have basically related to voters. ( Kreitz, 125 Ill. at 195 , 17 N.E. at 253 ; Park, 374 Ill. at 43 , 27 N.E.2d at 842 ; Coffey v. Board of Election Commissioners (1940), 375 Ill. 385,387-88 , 31 N.E.2d 588, 589 ; Clark, 377 Ill. at 426-27 , 36 N.E.2d at 565 ; Messman v. Newman Township High School District No. 150 (1942), 379 Ill. 32, 38-39 , 39 N.E.2d 332, 336 ; Tuthill v. Rendelman (1944), 387 Ill. 321, 341 , 56 N.E.2d 375, 386 ; Stein, 40 Ill.2d at 479-80 , 240 N.E.2d at 669 .) There is no reason to believe a differ | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Tuthill v. Rendelman
green
2 sentences1994The opinions of our supreme court dealing with the definition of residence have basically related to voters. ( Kreitz, 125 Ill. at 195 , 17 N.E. at 253 ; Park, 374 Ill. at 43 , 27 N.E.2d at 842 ; Coffey v. Board of Election Commissioners (1940), 375 Ill. 385,387-88 , 31 N.E.2d 588, 589 ; Clark, 377 Ill. at 426-27 , 36 N.E.2d at 565 ; Messman v. Newman Township High School District No. 150 (1942), 379 Ill. 32, 38-39 , 39 N.E.2d 332, 336 ; Tuthill v. Rendelman (1944), 387 Ill. 321, 341 , 56 N.E.2d 375, 386 ; Stein, 40 Ill.2d at 479-80 , 240 N.E.2d at 669 .) There is no reason to believe a differ 1994The opinions of our supreme court dealing with the definition of residence have basically related to voters. ( Kreitz, 125 Ill. at 195 , 17 N.E. at 253 ; Park, 374 Ill. at 43 , 27 N.E.2d at 842 ; Coffey v. Board of Election Commissioners (1940), 375 Ill. 385,387-88 , 31 N.E.2d 588, 589 ; Clark, 377 Ill. at 426-27 , 36 N.E.2d at 565 ; Messman v. Newman Township High School District No. 150 (1942), 379 Ill. 32, 38-39 , 39 N.E.2d 332, 336 ; Tuthill v. Rendelman (1944), 387 Ill. 321, 341 , 56 N.E.2d 375, 386 ; Stein, 40 Ill.2d at 479-80 , 240 N.E.2d at 669 .) There is no reason to believe a differ | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Kreitz v. Behrensmeyer
green
2 sentences1994The opinions of our supreme court dealing with the definition of residence have basically related to voters. ( Kreitz, 125 Ill. at 195 , 17 N.E. at 253 ; Park, 374 Ill. at 43 , 27 N.E.2d at 842 ; Coffey v. Board of Election Commissioners (1940), 375 Ill. 385,387-88 , 31 N.E.2d 588, 589 ; Clark, 377 Ill. at 426-27 , 36 N.E.2d at 565 ; Messman v. Newman Township High School District No. 150 (1942), 379 Ill. 32, 38-39 , 39 N.E.2d 332, 336 ; Tuthill v. Rendelman (1944), 387 Ill. 321, 341 , 56 N.E.2d 375, 386 ; Stein, 40 Ill.2d at 479-80 , 240 N.E.2d at 669 .) There is no reason to believe a differ 1994The opinions of our supreme court dealing with the definition of residence have basically related to voters. ( Kreitz, 125 Ill. at 195 , 17 N.E. at 253 ; Park, 374 Ill. at 43 , 27 N.E.2d at 842 ; Coffey v. Board of Election Commissioners (1940), 375 Ill. 385,387-88 , 31 N.E.2d 588, 589 ; Clark, 377 Ill. at 426-27 , 36 N.E.2d at 565 ; Messman v. Newman Township High School District No. 150 (1942), 379 Ill. 32, 38-39 , 39 N.E.2d 332, 336 ; Tuthill v. Rendelman (1944), 387 Ill. 321, 341 , 56 N.E.2d 375, 386 ; Stein, 40 Ill.2d at 479-80 , 240 N.E.2d at 669 .) There is no reason to believe a differ | 1 | 1994–1994 |
School District Number 153 v. School District Number 154½
green
1 sentence1979Here, the defendant Board has failed to state any compelling reason why we should reverse the decision in School District No. 153 v. School District No. 154½ (1977), 54 Ill. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.