notion instruction (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

notion instruction in Maryland

11 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Marks v. Stategreen
mdctspecapp · 1990 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019See Marks v. State, 84 Md.

2019See Marks v. State , 84 Md.

22
State v. Smullengreen
md · 2004 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017Id. at 250 , 844 A.2d at 439 (emphasis added).

2017Id. at 250 , 844 A.2d at 439 (emphasis added).

11
Bruce v. Stategreen
md · 1992 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993B Colvin-el proposed, and the trial court refused to give, the following instruction: “If for any reason you are unable within a reasonable degree of time to reach a unanimous judgment as to the balancing required by Section IV of the form, I will sentence Eugene Colvin-el to life without parole.” In Bruce v. State, 328 Md. 594, 621-22 , 616 A.2d 392, 406 (1992), we again rejected the notion that this instruction must be given.

1993B Colvin-el proposed, and the trial court refused to give, the following instruction: “If for any reason you are unable within a reasonable degree of time to reach a unanimous judgment as to the balancing required by Section IV of the form, I will sentence Eugene Colvin-el to life without parole.” In Bruce v. State, 328 Md. 594, 621-22 , 616 A.2d 392, 406 (1992), we again rejected the notion that this instruction must be given.

11
Oken v. Stategreen
md · 1992 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993See also Oken v. State, 327 Md. 628, 642-43 , 612 A.2d 258, 265 (1992), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1312 , 122 L.Ed.2d 700 (1993); Booth v. State, 327 Md. 142, 153-54 , 608 A.2d 162, 167 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 500 , 121 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992); Grandison v. State, 305 Md. at 771 , 506 A.2d at 623 ; Calhoun v. State, 297 Md. at 593-95, 468 A.2d at 58-60 .

1993See also Oken v. State, 327 Md. 628, 642-43 , 612 A.2d 258, 265 (1992), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1312 , 122 L.Ed.2d 700 (1993); Booth v. State, 327 Md. 142, 153-54 , 608 A.2d 162, 167 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 500 , 121 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992); Grandison v. State, 305 Md. at 771 , 506 A.2d at 623 ; Calhoun v. State, 297 Md. at 593-95, 468 A.2d at 58-60 .

11
Oken v. Marylandgreen
scotus · 1993 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993See also Oken v. State, 327 Md. 628, 642-43 , 612 A.2d 258, 265 (1992), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1312 , 122 L.Ed.2d 700 (1993); Booth v. State, 327 Md. 142, 153-54 , 608 A.2d 162, 167 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 500 , 121 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992); Grandison v. State, 305 Md. at 771 , 506 A.2d at 623 ; Calhoun v. State, 297 Md. at 593-95, 468 A.2d at 58-60 .

1993See also Oken v. State, 327 Md. 628, 642-43 , 612 A.2d 258, 265 (1992), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 1312 , 122 L.Ed.2d 700 (1993); Booth v. State, 327 Md. 142, 153-54 , 608 A.2d 162, 167 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 500 , 121 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992); Grandison v. State, 305 Md. at 771 , 506 A.2d at 623 ; Calhoun v. State, 297 Md. at 593-95, 468 A.2d at 58-60 .

11
Krauss v. Stategreen
mdctspecapp · 1990 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991
2 sentences

1991See Krauss, 82 Md.App. at 4-7 , 569 A.2d 1284 .

1991See Krauss, 82 Md.App. at 4-7 , 569 A.2d 1284 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (14)

CaseCitedYears
Harrison v. State green
md · 1975
2 sentences

2011Id. at 137-38 , 345 A.2d 830 .

2011Id. at 137-38 , 345 A.2d 830 .

12011–2011
Herman v. BD OF ADJUST. PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS TP. green
njsuperctappdiv · 1953
2 sentences

2002In Herman v. Board of Adjustment, 29 N.J.Super. 164 , 102 A.2d 73 (App.Div.1953), a subdivision plat was recorded in 1941.

2002In Herman v. Board of Adjustment, 29 N.J.Super. 164 , 102 A.2d 73 (App.Div.1953), a subdivision plat was recorded in 1941.

12002–2002
Calhoun v. State green
md · 1983
2 sentences

1993See also Oken v. State, 327 Md. 628, 642-43 , 612 A.2d 258, 265 (1992), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1312 , 122 L.Ed.2d 700 (1993); Booth v. State, 327 Md. 142, 153-54 , 608 A.2d 162, 167 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 500 , 121 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992); Grandison v. State, 305 Md. at 771 , 506 A.2d at 623 ; Calhoun v. State, 297 Md. at 593-95, 468 A.2d at 58-60 .

1993See also Oken v. State, 327 Md. 628, 642-43 , 612 A.2d 258, 265 (1992), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 1312 , 122 L.Ed.2d 700 (1993); Booth v. State, 327 Md. 142, 153-54 , 608 A.2d 162, 167 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 500 , 121 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992); Grandison v. State, 305 Md. at 771 , 506 A.2d at 623 ; Calhoun v. State, 297 Md. at 593-95, 468 A.2d at 58-60 .

11993–1993
Booth v. State green
md · 1992
2 sentences

1993See also Oken v. State, 327 Md. 628, 642-43 , 612 A.2d 258, 265 (1992), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1312 , 122 L.Ed.2d 700 (1993); Booth v. State, 327 Md. 142, 153-54 , 608 A.2d 162, 167 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 500 , 121 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992); Grandison v. State, 305 Md. at 771 , 506 A.2d at 623 ; Calhoun v. State, 297 Md. at 593-95, 468 A.2d at 58-60 .

1993See also Oken v. State, 327 Md. 628, 642-43 , 612 A.2d 258, 265 (1992), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1312 , 122 L.Ed.2d 700 (1993); Booth v. State, 327 Md. 142, 153-54 , 608 A.2d 162, 167 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 500 , 121 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992); Grandison v. State, 305 Md. at 771 , 506 A.2d at 623 ; Calhoun v. State, 297 Md. at 593-95, 468 A.2d at 58-60 .

11993–1993
Grandison v. State green
md · 1986
2 sentences

1993See also Oken v. State, 327 Md. 628, 642-43 , 612 A.2d 258, 265 (1992), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1312 , 122 L.Ed.2d 700 (1993); Booth v. State, 327 Md. 142, 153-54 , 608 A.2d 162, 167 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 500 , 121 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992); Grandison v. State, 305 Md. at 771 , 506 A.2d at 623 ; Calhoun v. State, 297 Md. at 593-95, 468 A.2d at 58-60 .

1993See also Oken v. State, 327 Md. 628, 642-43 , 612 A.2d 258, 265 (1992), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1312 , 122 L.Ed.2d 700 (1993); Booth v. State, 327 Md. 142, 153-54 , 608 A.2d 162, 167 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 500 , 121 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992); Grandison v. State, 305 Md. at 771 , 506 A.2d at 623 ; Calhoun v. State, 297 Md. at 593-95, 468 A.2d at 58-60 .

11993–1993
Vega v. Texas green
scotus · 1992
2 sentences

1993See also Oken v. State, 327 Md. 628, 642-43 , 612 A.2d 258, 265 (1992), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1312 , 122 L.Ed.2d 700 (1993); Booth v. State, 327 Md. 142, 153-54 , 608 A.2d 162, 167 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 500 , 121 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992); Grandison v. State, 305 Md. at 771 , 506 A.2d at 623 ; Calhoun v. State, 297 Md. at 593-95, 468 A.2d at 58-60 .

1993See also Oken v. State, 327 Md. 628, 642-43 , 612 A.2d 258, 265 (1992), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 1312 , 122 L.Ed.2d 700 (1993); Booth v. State, 327 Md. 142, 153-54 , 608 A.2d 162, 167 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 500 , 121 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992); Grandison v. State, 305 Md. at 771 , 506 A.2d at 623 ; Calhoun v. State, 297 Md. at 593-95, 468 A.2d at 58-60 .

11993–1993
In Re the Adoption of T. M. M. green
mont · 1980
2 sentences

1991The only appellate case containing any support for the notion that a violation of the ICPC is relevant in an adoption proceeding is the case cited and quoted in the majority’s opinion, Matter of Adoption of T.M.M., 186 Mont. 460 , 608 P.2d 130 (1980).

1991The only appellate case containing any support for the notion that a violation of the ICPC is relevant in an adoption proceeding is the case cited and quoted in the majority’s opinion, Matter of Adoption of T.M.M., 186 Mont. 460 , 608 P.2d 130 (1980).

11991–1991
Noble v. State green
md · 1982
2 sentences

1987In Noble v. State, 293 Md. 549 , 446 A.2d 844 (1982), we laid to rest the notion that a violation of the right to be present during a stage of a criminal trial can never be harmless.

1987In Noble v. State, 293 Md. 549 , 446 A.2d 844 (1982), we laid to rest the notion that a violation of the right to be present during a stage of a criminal trial can never be harmless.

11987–1987
State v. Saul green
md · 1970
2 sentences

1987In doing so we overruled State v. Saul, 258 Md. 100 , 265 A.2d 178 (1970) and disapproved Young v. *237 State, 5 Md.App. 383 , 247 A.2d 751 (1968).

1987In doing so we overruled State v. Saul, 258 Md. 100 , 265 A.2d 178 (1970) and disapproved Young v. *237 State, 5 Md.App. 383 , 247 A.2d 751 (1968).

11987–1987
Young v. State green
mdctspecapp · 1968
2 sentences

1987In doing so we overruled State v. Saul, 258 Md. 100 , 265 A.2d 178 (1970) and disapproved Young v. *237 State, 5 Md.App. 383 , 247 A.2d 751 (1968).

1987In doing so we overruled State v. Saul, 258 Md. 100 , 265 A.2d 178 (1970) and disapproved Young v. *237 State, 5 Md.App. 383 , 247 A.2d 751 (1968).

11987–1987
Johnson v. Zerbst green
scotus · 1938
2 sentences

1979In dealing with a similar forfeiture of right provision under what is now Maryland Rule 735 d, involving a procedural forfeiture of the right to trial by jury, Chief Judge Murphy was very clear for the Court of Appeals in State v. Jones, 270 Md, 388, 393, 312 A. 2d 281 (1973): “Under the prevailing rule an accused has no absolute right to withdraw his waiver of a jury trial; *95 whether it will be permitted is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.” The appellant first attacks broadly the notion that waiver, under Rule 786 or otherwise, can ever be anything other than t

1979In dealing with a similar forfeiture of right provision under what is now Maryland Rule 735 d, involving a procedural forfeiture of the right to trial by jury, Chief Judge Murphy was very clear for the Court of Appeals in State v. Jones, 270 Md, 388, 393, 312 A. 2d 281 (1973): “Under the prevailing rule an accused has no absolute right to withdraw his waiver of a jury trial; *95 whether it will be permitted is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.” The appellant first attacks broadly the notion that waiver, under Rule 786 or otherwise, can ever be anything other than t

11979–1979
State v. Jones green
md · 1973
1 sentence

1979In dealing with a similar forfeiture of right provision under what is now Maryland Rule 735 d, involving a procedural forfeiture of the right to trial by jury, Chief Judge Murphy was very clear for the Court of Appeals in State v. Jones, 270 Md, 388, 393, 312 A. 2d 281 (1973): “Under the prevailing rule an accused has no absolute right to withdraw his waiver of a jury trial; *95 whether it will be permitted is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.” The appellant first attacks broadly the notion that waiver, under Rule 786 or otherwise, can ever be anything other than t

11979–1979
State v. McKenzie green
mdctspecapp · 1973
1 sentence

1973App. 614, 615-621 , 299 A. 2d 862 ; State v. McKenzie, 17 Md.

11973–1973
Miller v. Warden green
mdctspecapp · 1973
2 sentences

1973App. 614, 615-621 , 299 A. 2d 862 ; State v. McKenzie, 17 Md.

1973It pointed out that the “intentional abandonment or relinquishment of a known right” measuring rod was enunciated “in the context of the safeguards of a fair criminal trial.” It added, “Our cases do not reflect an uncritical demand for a knowing and intelligent waiver in every situation where a person has failed to invoke a constitutional protection.” The Court made clear that the notion of waiver is a flexible one, from right to right, “While we have occasionally referred to a consent search as a ‘waiver,’ we have never used that term to mean ‘an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a

11973–1973

Where else courts name it

CA 37 (1971–2025) IL 23 (1978–2024) CT 21 (1986–2021) FL 16 (1954–2013) NY 16 (1913–2026) TX 15 (1985–2022) MD 11 (1973–2019) IN 11 (1989–2020) MI 9 (1995–2018) NJ 9 (1893–2025) AL 9 (1958–2017) UT 9 (2005–2022) OH 8 (1988–2022) WA 8 (1983–2015) GA 6 (2008–2022) MS 6 (1990–2024) KS 6 (1993–2014) PA 5 (1981–2024) CO 5 (1990–2014) IA 5 (2015–2023) NM 5 (1991–2010) MN 4 (1976–2017) DC 4 (1986–2000) NC 4 (1987–2016) VA 4 (1998–2017) MA 3 (1996–2026) LA 3 (1983–2014) KY 3 (2014–2018) WI 3 (1973–2021) MO 3 (1991–2018) NE 2 (2015–2025) WV 2 (2009–2012) TN 2 (2021–2022) ID 2 (1991–2014) AZ 2 (1979–2024) OR 2 (2004–2008) VT 2 (1995–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check