5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Maples v. Siddiqui
green
2 sentences2015Id. at 530 . 2015Id. at 530 . | 2 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Sailer
green
1 sentence2023Herron has not presented evidence the district court considered impermissible factors other than the notion that these factors 7 were not “completely absent from the judge’s mind” when rendering consecutive sentences. “[W]e trust that our district courts, when weighing such [victim] statements as part of the sentencing determination, will filter out improper or irrelevant evidence.” See id. at 764 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
green
1 sentence2022It is, therefore, hard to take at face value the impracticability argument. 191Schneckloth, 412 U.S. at 231 . 192Id. at 287 (Marshall, J., dissenting). 193James A. Adams, Search and Seizure As Seen by Supreme Court Justices: Are They Serious or Is This Just Judicial Humor?, 12 St. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Kilgore v. FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.
green
1 sentence2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.