11 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Roux v. City of Gulfportgreen2 sentences2009Id.; see. also (in chronological order) Roux v. City of Gulfport, 97 Miss. 559 , 52 So. 485 (1910) (holding same, but reading Runnels as condemning the substance of the Thompson instruction); cf. Saucier v. State, 102 Miss. 647 , 59 So. 858 (1912) (affirming, without comment, the trial court’s refusal to allow the in-, struction in Thompson phraseology) (citing Runnels and Ronx); Wiley v. State, 129 Miss. 196 , 91 So. 906 (1922) (same) (citing Runnels, Roux, and Saucier); Brady v. State, 128 Miss. 575 , 91 So. 277 (1922) (same) (citing same). ¶ 154. 2009Id.; see also (in chronological order) Roux v. City of Gulfport, 97 Miss. 559 , 52 So. 485 (1910) (holding same, but reading Runnels as condemning the substance of the Thompson instruction); cf. Saucier v. State, 102 Miss. 647 , 59 So. *661 858 (1912) (affirming, without comment, the trial court's refusal to allow the instruction in Thompson phraseology) (citing Runnels and Roux ); Wiley v. State, 129 Miss. 196 , 91 So. 906 (1922) (same) (citing Runnels, Roux, and Saucier ); Brady v. State, 128 Miss. 575 , 91 So. 277 (1922) (same) (citing same). ¶ 154. | 2 | 2 |
Brahan v. Meridian Home Telephone Co.green2 sentences2009Id.; see. also (in chronological order) Roux v. City of Gulfport, 97 Miss. 559 , 52 So. 485 (1910) (holding same, but reading Runnels as condemning the substance of the Thompson instruction); cf. Saucier v. State, 102 Miss. 647 , 59 So. 858 (1912) (affirming, without comment, the trial court’s refusal to allow the in-, struction in Thompson phraseology) (citing Runnels and Ronx); Wiley v. State, 129 Miss. 196 , 91 So. 906 (1922) (same) (citing Runnels, Roux, and Saucier); Brady v. State, 128 Miss. 575 , 91 So. 277 (1922) (same) (citing same). ¶ 154. 2009Id.; see also (in chronological order) Roux v. City of Gulfport, 97 Miss. 559 , 52 So. 485 (1910) (holding same, but reading Runnels as condemning the substance of the Thompson instruction); cf. Saucier v. State, 102 Miss. 647 , 59 So. *661 858 (1912) (affirming, without comment, the trial court's refusal to allow the instruction in Thompson phraseology) (citing Runnels and Roux ); Wiley v. State, 129 Miss. 196 , 91 So. 906 (1922) (same) (citing Runnels, Roux, and Saucier ); Brady v. State, 128 Miss. 575 , 91 So. 277 (1922) (same) (citing same). ¶ 154. | 2 | 2 |
Hale v. Ruleville Health Care Centergreen2 sentences2002In that later opinion, the Supreme Court quoted both the Jordan truncated iteration and the Wells-Lamont complete version, and then referred to the "Jordan/Thompson test." *471 Hale v. Ruleville Health Care Ctr., 687 So.2d 1221, 1226-28 (Miss.1997). 2000However, we observe that the supreme court has, on at least one other occasion, quoted verbatim the rule announced in Jordan v. Herculesin the process of analyzing a workers compensation case, although the court, later in its opinion, *1202 acknowledged the continued viability of Thompson v. Wells-Lamont Corp ., and, in fact, appeared to blur the distinction between the two cases by discussing the "Jordan/Thompson test." See Hale v. Ruleville Health Care Center, 687 So.2d 1221, 1226-28 (Miss.1997). ¶ 10. | 2 | 2 |
Fuselier v. Stategreen2 sentences2018Fuselier 13 v. State, 654 So. 2d 519, 522 (Miss. 1995) (holding that, while constitutional questions not raised at trial are generally deemed waived, errors affecting fundamental constitutional rights may be excepted from procedural bars which would otherwise prohibit consideration). 2018Fuselier v. State , 654 So.2d 519 , 522 (Miss. 1995) (holding that, while constitutional questions not raised at trial are generally deemed waived, errors affecting fundamental constitutional rights may be excepted from procedural bars which would otherwise prohibit consideration). | 1 | 1 |
Thompson v. Dung Thi Hoang Nguyengreen1 sentence2013Id. at 238 (¶¶ 21-22). ¶ 13. | 1 | 1 |
Goforth v. City of Ridgelandgreen1 sentence2010The Mississippi Supreme Court has previously held that Mississippi’s Constitution “provides that an accused of right may have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, but this does not mean he may subpoena anybody or anything as he pleases.” Goforth v. City of Ridgeland, 603 So.2d 323, 327 (Miss.1992). | 1 | 1 |
Lifestyle Furnishings v. Tollisongreen1 sentence2010Tollison, 985 So.2d at 359-60 (¶21). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. State
neutral
2 sentences2009Later, we expressly denounced Thompson, stating as follows: The principle sought to be invoked in this instruction was never applicable to testimony, except that of circumstantial evidence alone, and was improperly applied in Thompson v. State, 83 Miss. 287 , 35 So. 689 , to the testimony of eyewitnesses; and, as stated above, has since been- disapproved many times. 2009Later, we expressly denounced Thompson, stating as follows: The principle sought to be invoked in this instruction was never applicable to testimony, except that of circumstantial evidence alone, and was improperly applied in Thompson v. State, 83 Miss. 287 , 35 So. 689 , to the testimony of eyewitnesses; and, as stated above, has since been disapproved many times. | 2 | 2005–2009 |
Saucier v. State
neutral
2 sentences2009Id.; see. also (in chronological order) Roux v. City of Gulfport, 97 Miss. 559 , 52 So. 485 (1910) (holding same, but reading Runnels as condemning the substance of the Thompson instruction); cf. Saucier v. State, 102 Miss. 647 , 59 So. 858 (1912) (affirming, without comment, the trial court’s refusal to allow the in-, struction in Thompson phraseology) (citing Runnels and Ronx); Wiley v. State, 129 Miss. 196 , 91 So. 906 (1922) (same) (citing Runnels, Roux, and Saucier); Brady v. State, 128 Miss. 575 , 91 So. 277 (1922) (same) (citing same). ¶ 154. 2009Id.; see. also (in chronological order) Roux v. City of Gulfport, 97 Miss. 559 , 52 So. 485 (1910) (holding same, but reading Runnels as condemning the substance of the Thompson instruction); cf. Saucier v. State, 102 Miss. 647 , 59 So. 858 (1912) (affirming, without comment, the trial court’s refusal to allow the in-, struction in Thompson phraseology) (citing Runnels and Ronx); Wiley v. State, 129 Miss. 196 , 91 So. 906 (1922) (same) (citing Runnels, Roux, and Saucier); Brady v. State, 128 Miss. 575 , 91 So. 277 (1922) (same) (citing same). ¶ 154. | 2 | 2005–2009 |
Brady v. State
green
2 sentences2009Id.; see. also (in chronological order) Roux v. City of Gulfport, 97 Miss. 559 , 52 So. 485 (1910) (holding same, but reading Runnels as condemning the substance of the Thompson instruction); cf. Saucier v. State, 102 Miss. 647 , 59 So. 858 (1912) (affirming, without comment, the trial court’s refusal to allow the in-, struction in Thompson phraseology) (citing Runnels and Ronx); Wiley v. State, 129 Miss. 196 , 91 So. 906 (1922) (same) (citing Runnels, Roux, and Saucier); Brady v. State, 128 Miss. 575 , 91 So. 277 (1922) (same) (citing same). ¶ 154. 2009Id.; see. also (in chronological order) Roux v. City of Gulfport, 97 Miss. 559 , 52 So. 485 (1910) (holding same, but reading Runnels as condemning the substance of the Thompson instruction); cf. Saucier v. State, 102 Miss. 647 , 59 So. 858 (1912) (affirming, without comment, the trial court’s refusal to allow the in-, struction in Thompson phraseology) (citing Runnels and Ronx); Wiley v. State, 129 Miss. 196 , 91 So. 906 (1922) (same) (citing Runnels, Roux, and Saucier); Brady v. State, 128 Miss. 575 , 91 So. 277 (1922) (same) (citing same). ¶ 154. | 2 | 2005–2009 |
Pickens v. State
green
2 sentences2009Id.; see. also (in chronological order) Roux v. City of Gulfport, 97 Miss. 559 , 52 So. 485 (1910) (holding same, but reading Runnels as condemning the substance of the Thompson instruction); cf. Saucier v. State, 102 Miss. 647 , 59 So. 858 (1912) (affirming, without comment, the trial court’s refusal to allow the in-, struction in Thompson phraseology) (citing Runnels and Ronx); Wiley v. State, 129 Miss. 196 , 91 So. 906 (1922) (same) (citing Runnels, Roux, and Saucier); Brady v. State, 128 Miss. 575 , 91 So. 277 (1922) (same) (citing same). ¶ 154. 2009Id.; see also (in chronological order) Roux v. City of Gulfport, 97 Miss. 559 , 52 So. 485 (1910) (holding same, but reading Runnels as condemning the substance of the Thompson instruction); cf. Saucier v. State, 102 Miss. 647 , 59 So. *661 858 (1912) (affirming, without comment, the trial court's refusal to allow the instruction in Thompson phraseology) (citing Runnels and Roux ); Wiley v. State, 129 Miss. 196 , 91 So. 906 (1922) (same) (citing Runnels, Roux, and Saucier ); Brady v. State, 128 Miss. 575 , 91 So. 277 (1922) (same) (citing same). ¶ 154. | 2 | 2005–2009 |
Wiley v. State
neutral
2 sentences2009Id.; see. also (in chronological order) Roux v. City of Gulfport, 97 Miss. 559 , 52 So. 485 (1910) (holding same, but reading Runnels as condemning the substance of the Thompson instruction); cf. Saucier v. State, 102 Miss. 647 , 59 So. 858 (1912) (affirming, without comment, the trial court’s refusal to allow the in-, struction in Thompson phraseology) (citing Runnels and Ronx); Wiley v. State, 129 Miss. 196 , 91 So. 906 (1922) (same) (citing Runnels, Roux, and Saucier); Brady v. State, 128 Miss. 575 , 91 So. 277 (1922) (same) (citing same). ¶ 154. 2009Id.; see also (in chronological order) Roux v. City of Gulfport, 97 Miss. 559 , 52 So. 485 (1910) (holding same, but reading Runnels as condemning the substance of the Thompson instruction); cf. Saucier v. State, 102 Miss. 647 , 59 So. *661 858 (1912) (affirming, without comment, the trial court's refusal to allow the instruction in Thompson phraseology) (citing Runnels and Roux ); Wiley v. State, 129 Miss. 196 , 91 So. 906 (1922) (same) (citing Runnels, Roux, and Saucier ); Brady v. State, 128 Miss. 575 , 91 So. 277 (1922) (same) (citing same). ¶ 154. | 2 | 2005–2009 |
Jordan v. Hercules, Inc.
green
1 sentence2025The AJ applied the Jordan/Thompson test—which consists of two methods our supreme court has recognized to determine whether a claimant has established a prima facie case for total disability,2 as set forth in Jordan v. Hercules Inc., 600 So. 2d 179 (Miss. 1992), and Thompson v. Wells-Lamont Corp., 362 So. 2d 638 (Miss. 1978). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Thompson v. Wells-Lamont Corp.
green
1 sentence2025The AJ applied the Jordan/Thompson test—which consists of two methods our supreme court has recognized to determine whether a claimant has established a prima facie case for total disability,2 as set forth in Jordan v. Hercules Inc., 600 So. 2d 179 (Miss. 1992), and Thompson v. Wells-Lamont Corp., 362 So. 2d 638 (Miss. 1978). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Fair v. Mississippi Department of Employment Security
green
1 sentence2022Specifically, Thompson’s brief fails to contain a certificate of interested persons, tables, statement of assignment, statement of the case, or summary of the argument. “[T]his noncompliance alone serves as a procedural bar to our review.” Id. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
White v. State
green
1 sentence1979The first contention here is that it was error to overrule Thompson's motion to quash the indictment upon the ground that he had been "deprived of due process and equal protection of his rights under the 14th Amendment in that it was the pattern and practice in Rankin County in the selection of the grand jury foreman discriminated against and totally excluded blacks." This same contention was advanced in White, supra, and decided against the appellant. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Rose v. Mitchell
green
2 sentences1979This ruling is supported by the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Rose v. Mitchell, ___ U.S. ___, 99 S.Ct. 2993 , 61 L.Ed.2d 739 (1979). 1979This ruling is supported by the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Rose v. Mitchell, ___ U.S. ___, 99 S.Ct. 2993 , 61 L.Ed.2d 739 (1979). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.