7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thomas v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See, e.g., Thomas v. State, 372 Md. 342, 353 (2002) (Thomas I) (requiring a “similar analysis” before a court may admit evidence of the defendant’s refusal to give a blood sample in connection with a murder investigation, because the alleged conduct is “analogous” to flight); accord Thomas v. State, 397 Md. 557, 576 (2007) (Thomas II). 2021See, e.g., Thomas v. State, 372 Md. 342, 353 (2002) (Thomas I) (requiring a “similar analysis” before a court may admit evidence of the defendant’s refusal to give a blood sample in connection with a murder investigation, because the alleged conduct is “analogous” to flight); accord Thomas v. State, 397 Md. 557, 576 (2007) (Thomas II). | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See, e.g., Thomas v. State, 372 Md. 342, 353 (2002) (Thomas I) (requiring a “similar analysis” before a court may admit evidence of the defendant’s refusal to give a blood sample in connection with a murder investigation, because the alleged conduct is “analogous” to flight); accord Thomas v. State, 397 Md. 557, 576 (2007) (Thomas II). 2021See, e.g., Thomas v. State, 372 Md. 342, 353 (2002) (Thomas I) (requiring a “similar analysis” before a court may admit evidence of the defendant’s refusal to give a blood sample in connection with a murder investigation, because the alleged conduct is “analogous” to flight); accord Thomas v. State, 397 Md. 557, 576 (2007) (Thomas II). | 1 | 1 |
Busch v. Stategreen2 sentences2002The “character of the offense” is determined by what is stated in the body of an indictment, not the statutory reference or caption. 13 Busch v. State, 289 Md. 669, 678 , 426 A.2d 954, 959 (1981). *490 The character of the offense charged is really the gravamen of Thompson’s challenge, so we proceed to explore the language of the Second Count as compared to Sections 287A and 287(d)(2). 2002The “character of the offense” is determined by what is stated in the body of an indictment, not the statutory reference or caption. 13 Busch v. State, 289 Md. 669, 678 , 426 A.2d 954, 959 (1981). *490 The character of the offense charged is really the gravamen of Thompson’s challenge, so we proceed to explore the language of the Second Count as compared to Sections 287A and 287(d)(2). | 1 | 1 |
Roberson v. Counselmangreen2 sentences1987Health Plan of Colo., 710 P.2d 1153, 1155-1156 (Colo.App.1985); Roberson v. Counselman, 235 Kan. 1006, 1013-1021 , 686 P.2d 149, 158-160 (1984); Evers v. Dollinger, 95 N.J. 399, 413-419 , 471 A.2d 405, 412-415 (1984); Hamil v. Bashline, 481 Pa. 256, 269-274 , 392 A.2d 1280, 1288-1289 (1978), applying the Thompson rule. 7 . 1987Health Plan of Colo., 710 P.2d 1153, 1155-1156 (Colo.App.1985); Roberson v. Counselman, 235 Kan. 1006, 1013-1021 , 686 P.2d 149, 158-160 (1984); Evers v. Dollinger, 95 N.J. 399, 413-419 , 471 A.2d 405, 412-415 (1984); Hamil v. Bashline, 481 Pa. 256, 269-274 , 392 A.2d 1280, 1288-1289 (1978), applying the Thompson rule. 7 . | 1 | 1 |
Evers v. Dollingergreen2 sentences1987Health Plan of Colo., 710 P.2d 1153, 1155-1156 (Colo.App.1985); Roberson v. Counselman, 235 Kan. 1006, 1013-1021 , 686 P.2d 149, 158-160 (1984); Evers v. Dollinger, 95 N.J. 399, 413-419 , 471 A.2d 405, 412-415 (1984); Hamil v. Bashline, 481 Pa. 256, 269-274 , 392 A.2d 1280, 1288-1289 (1978), applying the Thompson rule. 7 . 1987Health Plan of Colo., 710 P.2d 1153, 1155-1156 (Colo.App.1985); Roberson v. Counselman, 235 Kan. 1006, 1013-1021 , 686 P.2d 149, 158-160 (1984); Evers v. Dollinger, 95 N.J. 399, 413-419 , 471 A.2d 405, 412-415 (1984); Hamil v. Bashline, 481 Pa. 256, 269-274 , 392 A.2d 1280, 1288-1289 (1978), applying the Thompson rule. 7 . | 1 | 1 |
Sharp v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plangreen2 sentences1987Health Plan of Colo., 710 P.2d 1153, 1155-1156 (Colo.App.1985); Roberson v. Counselman, 235 Kan. 1006, 1013-1021 , 686 P.2d 149, 158-160 (1984); Evers v. Dollinger, 95 N.J. 399, 413-419 , 471 A.2d 405, 412-415 (1984); Hamil v. Bashline, 481 Pa. 256, 269-274 , 392 A.2d 1280, 1288-1289 (1978), applying the Thompson rule. 7 . 1987Health Plan of Colo., 710 P.2d 1153, 1155-1156 (Colo.App.1985); Roberson v. Counselman, 235 Kan. 1006, 1013-1021 , 686 P.2d 149, 158-160 (1984); Evers v. Dollinger, 95 N.J. 399, 413-419 , 471 A.2d 405, 412-415 (1984); Hamil v. Bashline, 481 Pa. 256, 269-274 , 392 A.2d 1280, 1288-1289 (1978), applying the Thompson rule. 7 . | 1 | 1 |
Hamil v. Bashlinegreen2 sentences1987Health Plan of Colo., 710 P.2d 1153, 1155-1156 (Colo.App.1985); Roberson v. Counselman, 235 Kan. 1006, 1013-1021 , 686 P.2d 149, 158-160 (1984); Evers v. Dollinger, 95 N.J. 399, 413-419 , 471 A.2d 405, 412-415 (1984); Hamil v. Bashline, 481 Pa. 256, 269-274 , 392 A.2d 1280, 1288-1289 (1978), applying the Thompson rule. 7 . 1987Health Plan of Colo., 710 P.2d 1153, 1155-1156 (Colo.App.1985); Roberson v. Counselman, 235 Kan. 1006, 1013-1021 , 686 P.2d 149, 158-160 (1984); Evers v. Dollinger, 95 N.J. 399, 413-419 , 471 A.2d 405, 412-415 (1984); Hamil v. Bashline, 481 Pa. 256, 269-274 , 392 A.2d 1280, 1288-1289 (1978), applying the Thompson rule. 7 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. State
green
2 sentences2019In Thompson defense counsel moved, prior to trial, for a competency evaluation, which the trial court granted. 229 Md. 2019In Thompson defense counsel moved, prior to trial, for a competency evaluation, which the trial court granted. 229 Md. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Braxton v. State
green
1 sentence2020There, the appellant did not challenge the affidavit for failing to state that he lived at the given address, or even for failing to provide a basis for why the affiant thought the appellant would keep such evidence at his home; the affidavit did both of those things. 123 Md. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Franks v. Delaware
green
2 sentences2001Thompson maintains that the information in the affidavit was therefore false and misleading, and that “this inflation of the information known to the police is precisely what the Franks [v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978) ] procedure was designed to remedy.” He suggests further that “it is entirely possible that a judge faced with an affidavit based upon the account of one person who had provided diametrically different stories within hours of each other would not have issued a warrant.” Although there is some accuracy to Thompson’s claim, he is mistaken regardin 2001Thompson maintains that the information in the affidavit was therefore false and misleading, and that “this inflation of the information known to the police is precisely what the Franks [v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978) ] procedure was designed to remedy.” He suggests further that “it is entirely possible that a judge faced with an affidavit based upon the account of one person who had provided diametrically different stories within hours of each other would not have issued a warrant.” Although there is some accuracy to Thompson’s claim, he is mistaken regardin | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.