Thompson standard (South Carolina) · Go Syfert
← South Carolina issues

Thompson standard in South Carolina

6 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Edm v. Tamgreen
sc · 1992 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017See Dickert v. Dickert, 387 S.C. 1, 10 , 691 S.E.2d 448, 452 (2010) ("Whether to award attorney's fees is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion."); E.D.M. v. T.A.M., 307 S.C. 471 , 476-77, 415 S.E.2d 812, 816 (1992) ("In determining whether an attorney's fee should be awarded, the following factors should be considered: (1) the party's ability to pay his/her own attorney's fee; (2) beneficial results obtained by the attorney; (3) the parties' respective financial conditions; (4) effect of the attorney's fee on e

2017See Dickert v. Dickert, 387 S.C. 1, 10 , 691 S.E.2d 448, 452 (2010) ("Whether to award attorney's fees is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion."); E.D.M. v. T.A.M., 307 S.C. 471 , 476-77, 415 S.E.2d 812, 816 (1992) ("In determining whether an attorney's fee should be awarded, the following factors should be considered: (1) the party's ability to pay his/her own attorney's fee; (2) beneficial results obtained by the attorney; (3) the parties' respective financial conditions; (4) effect of the attorney's fee on e

11
Dickert v. Dickertgreen
sc · 2010 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017See Dickert v. Dickert, 387 S.C. 1, 10 , 691 S.E.2d 448, 452 (2010) ("Whether to award attorney's fees is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion."); E.D.M. v. T.A.M., 307 S.C. 471 , 476-77, 415 S.E.2d 812, 816 (1992) ("In determining whether an attorney's fee should be awarded, the following factors should be considered: (1) the party's ability to pay his/her own attorney's fee; (2) beneficial results obtained by the attorney; (3) the parties' respective financial conditions; (4) effect of the attorney's fee on e

2017See Dickert v. Dickert, 387 S.C. 1, 10 , 691 S.E.2d 448, 452 (2010) ("Whether to award attorney's fees is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion."); E.D.M. v. T.A.M., 307 S.C. 471 , 476-77, 415 S.E.2d 812, 816 (1992) ("In determining whether an attorney's fee should be awarded, the following factors should be considered: (1) the party's ability to pay his/her own attorney's fee; (2) beneficial results obtained by the attorney; (3) the parties' respective financial conditions; (4) effect of the attorney's fee on e

11
Thompson v. Stategreen
scctapp · 2014 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016In dissent, Judge Thomas found that Thompson’s claim presented a justiciable controversy because of the SCDC’s current classification of Thompson as a sex offender, noting that the classification “could have immediate and harmful ramifications.” Id. at 390-91 , 762 S.E.2d at 53 (Thomas, J., dissenting).

2016In dissent, Judge Thomas found that Thompson’s claim presented a justiciable controversy because of the SCDC’s current classification of Thompson as a sex offender, noting that the classification “could have immediate and harmful ramifications.” Id. at 390-91 , 762 S.E.2d at 53 (Thomas, J., dissenting).

11
Obergefell v. Hodgesgreen
scotus · 2015 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016In July 2015, while the instant appeal was pending, the Supreme Court of the United States held "that same-sex couples may exercise the right to marry." Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584, 2599 (2015).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc. green
sc · 1993
2 sentences

2019Accordingly, the court weighed the evidence and finally determined a substantial matter forming part of Stone's causes of action, as well as Thompson's defense, which satisfies the test we clarified in Mid-State . 310 S.C. at 334 , 426 S.E.2d at 780 .

2019Accordingly, the court weighed the evidence and finally determined a substantial matter forming part of Stone's causes of action, as well as Thompson's defense, which satisfies the test we clarified in Mid-State . 310 S.C. at 334 , 426 S.E.2d at 780 .

12019–2019
Hazel v. State green
sc · 2008
2 sentences

2014The plaintiff in Hazel was convicted of kidnapping in 1979 and released from prison on parole in 2002. 377 S.C. at 62 , 659 S.E.2d at 138 .

2014The plaintiff in Hazel was convicted of kidnapping in 1979 and released from prison on parole in 2002. 377 S.C. at 62 , 659 S.E.2d at 138 .

12014–2014
State v. Brown green
sc · 1994
2 sentences

2003A leading case in South Carolina in regard to evidence offered for the purpose of explaining why a government investigation was undertaken is State v. Brown, 317 S.C. 55 , 451 S.E.2d 888 (1994).

2003A leading case in South Carolina in regard to evidence offered for the purpose of explaining why a government investigation was undertaken is State v. Brown, 317 S.C. 55 , 451 S.E.2d 888 (1994).

12003–2003

Where else courts name it

TX 47 (1942–2026) CA 37 (1971–2025) OH 26 (1990–2026) WA 24 (1996–2026) PA 23 (1985–2025) GA 23 (1987–2026) FL 22 (1985–2019) IL 20 (1978–2026) IA 18 (1992–2025) AL 14 (1985–2025) MS 11 (1979–2025) IN 10 (1999–2020) KS 8 (1973–2025) AR 8 (1979–2025) MI 8 (1902–2025) OR 7 (1995–2025) MD 7 (1987–2021) AZ 7 (1968–2022) ND 6 (1985–2011) SC 6 (2003–2019) ME 6 (1977–2022) DC 6 (1983–2016) MO 5 (1995–2025) NE 5 (1990–2023) MN 4 (1985–2016) NY 4 (1984–2011) VA 4 (1997–2023) WI 4 (1987–2023) UT 4 (2014–2025) DE 4 (1982–2026) ID 4 (1992–2016) CT 3 (2004–2010) MT 3 (1934–2015) VT 3 (2011–2024) NC 3 (1990–2014) CO 2 (2001–2021) WV 2 (2010–2017) SD 2 (1985–1997) TN 2 (1999–2004) KY 2 (1914–2000) OK 2 (2010–2015) NJ 2 (1971–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check