11 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. McElrathgreen2 sentences1994As we noted in State v. McElrath, “the relevance standard to be applied in this and other cases is relatively lax.” State v. McElrath, 322 N.C. 1, 13 , 366 S.E.2d 442, 449 (1988). 1994As we noted in State v. McElrath, “the relevance standard to be applied in this and other cases is relatively lax.” State v. McElrath, 322 N.C. 1, 13 , 366 S.E.2d 442, 449 (1988). | 1 | 2 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.green1 sentence2016See Daubert, 509 U.S. at 591 ; Howerton, 358 N.C. at 462 , 597 S.E.2d at 688-89 . | 1 | 1 |
Warren v. Jacksongreen2 sentences2005Williams v. McCoy, 145 N.C.App. 111, 116-17 , 550 S.E.2d 796, 801 (2001); Warren v. Jackson, 125 N.C.App. 96, 98 , 479 S.E.2d 278, 279-80 (1997); see generally 1 Kenneth S. Broun, Brandis & Broun on North Carolina Evidence, § 108, p. 333 (5th ed.1998). 2005Williams v. McCoy, 145 N.C.App. 111, 116-17 , 550 S.E.2d 796, 801 (2001); Warren v. Jackson, 125 N.C.App. 96, 98 , 479 S.E.2d 278, 279-80 (1997); see generally 1 Kenneth S. Broun, Brandis & Broun on North Carolina Evidence, § 108, p. 333 (5th ed.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. McCoygreen2 sentences2005Williams v. McCoy, 145 N.C.App. 111, 116-17 , 550 S.E.2d 796, 801 (2001); Warren v. Jackson, 125 N.C.App. 96, 98 , 479 S.E.2d 278, 279-80 (1997); see generally 1 Kenneth S. Broun, Brandis & Broun on North Carolina Evidence, § 108, p. 333 (5th ed.1998). 2005Williams v. McCoy, 145 N.C.App. 111, 116-17 , 550 S.E.2d 796, 801 (2001); Warren v. Jackson, 125 N.C.App. 96, 98 , 479 S.E.2d 278, 279-80 (1997); see generally 1 Kenneth S. Broun, Brandis & Broun on North Carolina Evidence, § 108, p. 333 (5th ed.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Gibson v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New Yorkgreen1 sentence2004App. at 291 , 465 S.E.2d at 61 (“[T]he statements meet the relevance requirement as .they were made in connection with numerous questions [the witness] was asked during the course of the deposition.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. McGrady
green
2 sentences2019First the relevance inquiry requires that “the area of proposed testimony must be based on ‘scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge’ that ‘will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.’ ” Id. (quoting N.C.R. 2018This is the relevance inquiry." Id. | 3 | 2018–2019 |
Evans v. Cowan
green
1 sentence2017Notably, we observed that "no evidence in the record indicates plaintiff ever voiced her concerns publicly outside the employment setting, which would tend to indicate a public concern." Id. *645 Evans underscores the relevance to this inquiry of the context and form of the speech at issue. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.
red
1 sentence2016See Daubert, 509 U.S. at 591 ; Howerton, 358 N.C. at 462 , 597 S.E.2d at 688-89 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
In the Matter of Yocum
red
1 sentence2016See Daubert, 509 U.S. at 591 ; Howerton, 358 N.C. at 462 , 597 S.E.2d at 688-89 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Hayman v. Ramada Inn, Inc.
green
1 sentence1999Cf. Hayman v. Ramada Inn, Inc., 86 N.C. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Willis v. Duke Power Co.
green
2 sentences1992Willis, 291 N.C. at 34 , 229 S.E.2d at 200 . 1992Willis, 291 N.C. at 34 , 229 S.E.2d at 200 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
McDonald v. Missouri
green
2 sentences1989"The relevance standard to be applied is relatively lax." McElrath, 322 N.C. at 13 , 366 S.E.2d at 449 . "[T]he standard in criminal cases is particularly easily satisfied. `Any evidence calculated to throw light upon the crime charged' should be admitted by the trial court." Id., quoting State v. Huffstetler, 312 N.C. 92, 104 , 322 S.E.2d 110, 118 , cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1009 , 105 S.Ct. 1877 , 85 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984). 1989"The relevance standard to be applied is relatively lax." McElrath, 322 N.C. at 13 , 366 S.E.2d at 449 . "[T]he standard in criminal cases is particularly easily satisfied. `Any evidence calculated to throw light upon the crime charged' should be admitted by the trial court." Id., quoting State v. Huffstetler, 312 N.C. 92, 104 , 322 S.E.2d 110, 118 , cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1009 , 105 S.Ct. 1877 , 85 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Huffstetler
green
2 sentences1989"The relevance standard to be applied is relatively lax." McElrath, 322 N.C. at 13 , 366 S.E.2d at 449 . "[T]he standard in criminal cases is particularly easily satisfied. `Any evidence calculated to throw light upon the crime charged' should be admitted by the trial court." Id., quoting State v. Huffstetler, 312 N.C. 92, 104 , 322 S.E.2d 110, 118 , cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1009 , 105 S.Ct. 1877 , 85 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984). 1989"The relevance standard to be applied is relatively lax." McElrath, 322 N.C. at 13 , 366 S.E.2d at 449 . "[T]he standard in criminal cases is particularly easily satisfied. `Any evidence calculated to throw light upon the crime charged' should be admitted by the trial court." Id., quoting State v. Huffstetler, 312 N.C. 92, 104 , 322 S.E.2d 110, 118 , cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1009 , 105 S.Ct. 1877 , 85 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.