general legal principle in New York

1886Ackley v. Dygert, 33 Barb., 176 ; Brown v. McCune, 5 Sandf., 224 .

1886(Ackley v. Dygert, 33 Barb., 176 ; Brown v. McCune, 5 Sandf., 224 .) These cases proceed upon the legal principle that a person under the age of twenty-one years will not be estopped from asserting the truth, by the mere circumstance appearing to have transpired in this case.

1886Ackley v. Dygert, 33 Barb., 176 ; Brown v. McCune, 5 Sandf., 224 .

1886(Ackley v. Dygert, 33 Barb., 176 ; Brown v. McCune, 5 Sandf., 224 .) These cases proceed upon the legal principle that a person under the age of twenty-one years will not be estopped from asserting the truth, by the mere circumstance appearing to have transpired in this case.

1992Turning to the general legal rule, in Atkins v Crosland (supra), the Texas Supreme Court took the basic view that an injury must occur before a cause of action accrues (citing 34 Am Jur, Limitations of Actions, § 160; 54 CJS, Limitations of Actions, § 168).

1990There are, however, exceptions to that rule (see, Ravo v Rogatnick, supraWiseman v 374 Realty Corp., 54 AD2d 119 ; cf., Zillman v Meadowbrook Hosp.

1990Although other grounds were originally advanced in support of the defendant Piccione’s summary judgment motion, dismissal of the cross claim was based solely on the general legal rule that a successive tort-feasor may not seek contribution from a prior tort-feasor (see, Derby v Prewitt, 12 NY2d 100, 103 ; see also, Ravo v Rogatnick, 70 NY2d 305, 310 ).

1980(See, e.g., Boyce Motor Lines v State of New York, 280 App Div 693, 696 , affd 306 NY 801 ; see, also, Court of Claims Act, § 12, subd 1.) Claimant’s second failure results from the reasonable interpretation and proper construction of the relevant statutory provisions under the circumstances at bar.

1980(See, e.g., Boyce Motor Lines v State of New York, 280 App Div 693, 696 , affd 306 NY 801 ; see, also, Court of Claims Act, § 12, subd 1.) Claimant’s second failure results from the reasonable interpretation and proper construction of the relevant statutory provisions under the circumstances at bar.

1979(See, also, Cruz v Collazo, 450 F Supp 235 .) This general legal principle appears equally applicable to duly adjudicated juvenile delinquents in the custodial care of the New York State Division for Youth.

1890That was held in People v. Railroad Co., 57 N. Y. 161 ; People v. Ingersoll, 58 N. Y. 1 ; and People v. Railroad Co., 89 N. Y. 75 .

1890That was held in People v. Railroad Co., 57 N. Y. 161 ; People v. Ingersoll, 58 N. Y. 1 ; and People v. Railroad Co., 89 N. Y. 75 .

1890That was held in People v. Railroad Co., 57 N. Y. 161 ; People v. Ingersoll, 58 N. Y. 1 ; and People v. Railroad Co., 89 N. Y. 75 .

1887Co., 98 N. Y., 211 .) The injury sustained by the plaintiff was solely attributable to the inattention or want of skill of liimself and bis immediate associates who were engaged in this work, and the general legal principle applicable to this class of cases, with these facts established against the plaintiff, will not permit him to maintain an action for damages against the defendants in whose employment each of these persons was engaged. the judgment dismissing the complaint at the circuit was right and it should be affirmed.

1853Mr. Justice Platt, also, in Ostrander v. Brown, ( 15 John. 89 ,) referring to this class of cases, says,- “ If the consignee1 would not take charge of the goods, the carrier ought to have secured them on board his vessel, Or in some other place of safety, and that would have entitled him to his freight, with all extra charges.” • The cas'e of Goold V.