11 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2025 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnson and Henderson Partnership v. Hendersongreen2 sentences2024We have held that this fact does not of itself require the exclusion of such testimony.” (Emphasis added.)); see also Johnson and Henderson Partnership v. Henderson, 321 Or App 134 , 142 n 6, 516 P3d 726 (2022), rev den, 370 Or 714 (2023) (“Of course, all declarations or testimony by a proponent of a claim to prove that claim * * * are ‘self-serv- ing’ to an extent. 2024We have held that this fact does not of itself require the exclusion of such testimony.” (Emphasis added.)); see also Johnson and Henderson Partnership v. Henderson, 321 Or App 134 , 142 n 6, 516 P3d 726 (2022), rev den, 370 Or 714 (2023) (“Of course, all declarations or testimony by a proponent of a claim to prove that claim * * * are ‘self-serv- ing’ to an extent. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Jacksongreen1 sentence2025See Jackson, 334 Or App at 470 (“[C]onsidering the evidence in the light most favorable to the proponent of the instruction means that we do not attempt to resolve conflicts in the evidence * * *. | 1 | 1 |
Burgdorf v. Westongreen2 sentences2022See Burgdorf v. Weston, 259 Or App 755, 775-76 , 316 P3d 303 (2013), rev den, 355 Or 380 (2014) (stating the test for determining whether an affidavit fails to raise a genuine issue of material fact because it directly contradicts earlier evidence or testimony). 6 Of course, all declarations or testimony by a proponent of a claim to prove that claim or, here, oppose summary judgment on that claim, are “self-serving” to an extent. 2022See Burgdorf v. Weston, 259 Or App 755, 775-76 , 316 P3d 303 (2013), rev den, 355 Or 380 (2014) (stating the test for determining whether an affidavit fails to raise a genuine issue of material fact because it directly contradicts earlier evidence or testimony). 6 Of course, all declarations or testimony by a proponent of a claim to prove that claim or, here, oppose summary judgment on that claim, are “self-serving” to an extent. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hansengreen2 sentences2003See Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp., 173 Or App 127, 134 , 20 P3d 837 , rev den, 332 Or 518 (2001) (holding that it is incumbent on party seeking disclosure of privileged material to show that material is subject to exception to privilege); see also State v. Hansen, 82 Or App 178, 186 , 728 P2d 542 (1986), rev’d in part on other grounds, 304 Or 169 , 743 P2d 157 (1987) (holding that the defendant, as proponent, “had the burden of showing that [an] exception to the patient-psychotherapist privilege is applicable”). 2003See Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp., 173 Or App 127, 134 , 20 P3d 837 , rev den, 332 Or 518 (2001) (holding that it is incumbent on party seeking disclosure of privileged material to show that material is subject to exception to privilege); see also State v. Hansen, 82 Or App 178, 186 , 728 P2d 542 (1986), rev’d in part on other grounds, 304 Or 169 , 743 P2d 157 (1987) (holding that the defendant, as proponent, “had the burden of showing that [an] exception to the patient-psychotherapist privilege is applicable”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hansengreen1 sentence2003See Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp., 173 Or App 127, 134 , 20 P3d 837 , rev den, 332 Or 518 (2001) (holding that it is incumbent on party seeking disclosure of privileged material to show that material is subject to exception to privilege); see also State v. Hansen, 82 Or App 178, 186 , 728 P2d 542 (1986), rev’d in part on other grounds, 304 Or 169 , 743 P2d 157 (1987) (holding that the defendant, as proponent, “had the burden of showing that [an] exception to the patient-psychotherapist privilege is applicable”). | 1 | 1 |
Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.green2 sentences2003See Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp., 173 Or App 127, 134 , 20 P3d 837 , rev den, 332 Or 518 (2001) (holding that it is incumbent on party seeking disclosure of privileged material to show that material is subject to exception to privilege); see also State v. Hansen, 82 Or App 178, 186 , 728 P2d 542 (1986), rev’d in part on other grounds, 304 Or 169 , 743 P2d 157 (1987) (holding that the defendant, as proponent, “had the burden of showing that [an] exception to the patient-psychotherapist privilege is applicable”). 2003See Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp., 173 Or App 127, 134 , 20 P3d 837 , rev den, 332 Or 518 (2001) (holding that it is incumbent on party seeking disclosure of privileged material to show that material is subject to exception to privilege); see also State v. Hansen, 82 Or App 178, 186 , 728 P2d 542 (1986), rev’d in part on other grounds, 304 Or 169 , 743 P2d 157 (1987) (holding that the defendant, as proponent, “had the burden of showing that [an] exception to the patient-psychotherapist privilege is applicable”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Henrygreen2 sentences2000See Henry, 302 Or. at 521 , 732 P.2d 9 . 2000See Henry, 302 Or. at 521 , 732 P.2d 9 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Owen
green
2 sentences2025Because the error was not harmless, we reverse and remand.1 We describe the evidence “in the light most favorable to the proponent of the instruction” to determine whether the record “supported giving the instruction.” State v. Owen, 369 Or 288, 290 , 505 P3d 953 (2022). 2025Because the error was not harmless, we reverse and remand.1 We describe the evidence “in the light most favorable to the proponent of the instruction” to determine whether the record “supported giving the instruction.” State v. Owen, 369 Or 288, 290 , 505 P3d 953 (2022). | 2 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Hatchell
green
1 sentence2022In addition, to determine whether instructional error was harmless, we “consider[ ] in part the context of the evidence and record at trial, includ- ing the parties’ theories of the case.” Id. (internal quotation Cite as 322 Or App 309 (2022) 313 marks omitted). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Payne
green
2 sentences2022State v. Payne, 366 Or 588, 607 , 468 P3d 445 (2020). 2022State v. Payne, 366 Or 588, 607 , 468 P3d 445 (2020). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Chaffin v. Ramsey
green
1 sentence1984The dissent argued that the correct rule for testing the evidence was that of § 339(1) combined with the holding in Wright v. Schutt Construction, supra, that there must be a “genuine pre-estimate of injury as of the time when the contract was made.” 276 Or at 443-444 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.