proponent challenge (Nevada) · Go Syfert
← Nevada issues

proponent challenge in Nevada

24 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2021 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

CaseFollowedCited
Purkett v. Elemgreen
scotus · 1995 · cited in 9 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 1998–2021
2 sentences

2021As the United States Supreme Court has admonished, "the proponent of a strike must give a clear and reasonably specific explanation of [the] legitimate reasons for exercising the challenges." Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 768-69 (1995) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted); see also State v. Giles, 754 S.E.2d 261, 265 (S.C. 2014) ("The proponent of the challenge must provide an objectively discernible basis for the challenge that permits the opponent of the SUPREME COURT OF PlEvADA 5 (I)) 1947A 40123.c. •' •-mkt • • , 7717.7;-/ •-?.!•"^. gender-based and thus impermissible.

2021As the United States Supreme Court has admonished, "the proponent of a strike must give a clear and reasonably specific explanation of [the] legitimate reasons for exercising the challenges." Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 768-69 (1995) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted); see also State v. Giles, 754 S.E.2d 261, 265 (S.C. 2014) ("The proponent of the challenge must provide an objectively discernible basis for the challenge that permits the opponent of the SUPREME COURT OF PlEvADA 5 (I)) 1947A 40123.c. •' •-mkt • • , 7717.7;-/ •-?.!•"^. gender-based and thus impermissible.

99
Ford v. Stategreen
nev · 2006 · cited in 15 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2011–2020
2 sentences

2016Ford, 122 Nev. at 403 , 132 P.3d at 577 (providing that once a prima facie case of discrimination is established "the production burden then shifts to the proponent of the challenge to assert a neutral explanation for the challenge").

2016Ford, 122 Nev. at 403 , 132 P.3d at 577 (providing that once a prima facie case of discrimination is established "the production burden then shifts to the proponent of the challenge to assert a neutral explanation for the challenge").

815
Johnson v. Californiagreen
scotus · 2005 · cited in 3 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2014–2015
2 sentences

2015Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 767 (1995). "[Al defendant satisfies the requirements of Batson's first step by producing evidence sufficient to permit the trial judge to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred." Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162, 170 (2005); see also Watson v. State, 130 Nev., Adv.

2015Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 767 (1995). "[Al defendant satisfies the requirements of Batson's first step by producing evidence sufficient to permit the trial judge to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred." Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162, 170 (2005); see also Watson v. State, 130 Nev., Adv.

33
McCarty v. Stategreen
nev · 2016 · cited in 3 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2020–2021
2 sentences

2021Id.

2021McCarty, 132 Nev. at 226, 371 P.3d at 1007.

13
State v. Gilesgreen
sc · 2014 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
2 sentences

2021As the United States Supreme Court has admonished, "the proponent of a strike must give a clear and reasonably specific explanation of [the] legitimate reasons for exercising the challenges." Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 768-69 (1995) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted); see also State v. Giles, 754 S.E.2d 261, 265 (S.C. 2014) ("The proponent of the challenge must provide an objectively discernible basis for the challenge that permits the opponent of the SUPREME COURT OF PlEvADA 5 (I)) 1947A 40123.c. •' •-mkt • • , 7717.7;-/ •-?.!•"^. gender-based and thus impermissible.

2021As the United States Supreme Court has admonished, "the proponent of a strike must give a clear and reasonably specific explanation of [the] legitimate reasons for exercising the challenges." Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 768-69 (1995) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted); see also State v. Giles, 754 S.E.2d 261, 265 (S.C. 2014) ("The proponent of the challenge must provide an objectively discernible basis for the challenge that permits the opponent of the SUPREME COURT OF PlEvADA 5 (I)) 1947A 40123.c. •' •-mkt • • , 7717.7;-/ •-?.!•"^. gender-based and thus impermissible.

11
Doyle v. Statered
nev · 1996 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Doyle v. State, 112 Nev. 879, 888 , 921 P.2d 901, 907 (1996) (citing Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 359 (1991)), overruled on other grounds by Kaczmarek v. State, 120 Nev. 314, 333 , 91 P.3d 16, 29 (2004).

2014Doyle v. State, 112 Nev. 879, 888 , 921 P.2d 901, 907 (1996) (citing Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 359 (1991)), overruled on other grounds by Kaczmarek v. State, 120 Nev. 314, 333 , 91 P.3d 16, 29 (2004).

11
Hernandez v. New Yorkgreen
scotus · 1991 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014Doyle v. State, 112 Nev. 879, 888 , 921 P.2d 901, 907 (1996) (citing Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 359 (1991)), overruled on other grounds by Kaczmarek v. State, 120 Nev. 314, 333 , 91 P.3d 16, 29 (2004).

11
Kaczmarek v. Stategreen
nev · 2004 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Doyle v. State, 112 Nev. 879, 888 , 921 P.2d 901, 907 (1996) (citing Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 359 (1991)), overruled on other grounds by Kaczmarek v. State, 120 Nev. 314, 333 , 91 P.3d 16, 29 (2004).

2014Doyle v. State, 112 Nev. 879, 888 , 921 P.2d 901, 907 (1996) (citing Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 359 (1991)), overruled on other grounds by Kaczmarek v. State, 120 Nev. 314, 333 , 91 P.3d 16, 29 (2004).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Watson v. State green
nev · 2014
1 sentence

2015Op 76, 335 P.3d 157 , 166 (2014).

12015–2015
McNair v. Eighth Judicial District Court green
nev · 1994
2 sentences

2011McNair, 110 Nev. at 1289 , 885 P.2d at 579 .

2011McNair, 110 Nev. at 1289 , 885 P.2d at 579 .

12011–2011

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.030 (6) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.602 (5) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 177.055 (4) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.380 (4) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.165 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.021 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.051 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.061 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.415 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.310 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.481 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 48.035 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

AZ 309 (1980–2026) VA 213 (1992–2026) TX 152 (1988–2025) OH 65 (1997–2026) NY 64 (1895–2026) MO 64 (1968–2025) CA 52 (1915–2026) MI 28 (1975–2025) KY 28 (2002–2025) NV 24 (1998–2021) IL 22 (1887–2025) PA 19 (1985–2025) WA 19 (1975–2023) FL 18 (1971–2023) CO 12 (1986–2025) SC 11 (1997–2026) NM 10 (1985–2025) OR 10 (1984–2025) MD 7 (1992–2019) CT 7 (2000–2021) DC 6 (1980–2025) TN 6 (1939–2021) MA 6 (1997–2016) MN 6 (1986–1991) IN 6 (1986–2019) DE 5 (1989–2022) WY 5 (1979–1982) VT 5 (2024–2026) ID 4 (1960–2023) AR 4 (2002–2025) RI 4 (2001–2007) MS 4 (1990–2010) NC 3 (2002–2011) GA 3 (2014–2024) ND 3 (1929–2012) LA 2 (1975–1996) WI 2 (2006–2011) SD 2 (1917–2004) NJ 2 (1993–1995) VI 2 (2012–2017) AL 2 (1982–2011) NE 2 (2023–2024) OK 2 (1992–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check