protective rule (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

protective rule in Pennsylvania

11 Pennsylvania opinions name it 5 courts 1953–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Gray v. Marylandgreen
scotus · 1998 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2002–2018
2 sentences

2002Most recently, in Gray v. Maryland, 523 U.S. 185 , 118 S.Ct. 1151 , 140 L.Ed.2d 294 (1998), the Court considered the scope of the protective rule first announced in Bruton by examining its decisions in both Bruton and Richardson.

2002Most recently, in Gray v. Maryland, 523 U.S. 185 , 118 S.Ct. 1151 , 140 L.Ed.2d 294 (1998), the Court considered the scope of the protective rule first announced in Bruton by examining its decisions in both Bruton and Richardson.

23
Blount v. Philadelphia Parking Authoritygreen
pa · 2009 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013See Blount v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, 600 Pa. 277 , 279 n. 4, 965 A.2d 226 , 228 n. 4 (2009). . 53 Pa.C.S. § 5714(b) states, in relevant part, that ”[e]ach taxicab within cities of the first class shall be equipped with a protective bar rier for the protection of the driver, separating the front seat from the back seat....''

2013See Blount v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, 600 Pa. 277 , 279 n. 4, 965 A.2d 226 , 228 n. 4 (2009). . 53 Pa.C.S. § 5714(b) states, in relevant part, that ”[e]ach taxicab within cities of the first class shall be equipped with a protective bar rier for the protection of the driver, separating the front seat from the back seat....''

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

CaseCitedYears
Cannon v. Bresch green
· 1932
2 sentences

1964A protective clause in a lease, whereby a tenant agrees to release a landlord from liability for non willful injury, commonly referred to as an exculpatory clause, is valid and enforcible if it does not contravene any policy of law, that is, if it is not a matter of interest to the public or State, but merely an agreement between persons relating entirely to their private affairs: Dilks v. Flohr Chevrolet, Inc., supra; Cannon v. Bresch, 307 Pa. 31 (1932).

1953Such a protective clause is undoubtedly valid and enforceable if it does not contravene any policy of the law, that is, if it is not a matter of interest to the public or the State but merely an agreement be *310 tween persons relating entirely to their private affairs : Cannon v. Bresch, 307 Pa. 31 , 160 A. 595 ; Jacob Siegal Co. v. Philadelphia Record Co., 348 Pa. 245 , 35 A. 2d 408 ; Manius v. Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh, 350 Pa. 512 , 39 A. 2d 614 ; Wright v. Sterling Land Co., Inc., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 625 , 43 A. 2d 614 .

31953–1977
Bruton v. United States green
scotus · 1968
2 sentences

2018However, the United States Supreme Court later held that redactions indicated with an obvious blank, the word "delete," symbols, or other markers violate the protective rule established in Bruton v. United States , 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968).

2018However, the United States Supreme Court later held that redactions indicated with an obvious blank, the word "delete," symbols, or other markers violate the protective rule established in Bruton v. United States , 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968).

22018–2018
Manius v. Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh green
pa · 1944
2 sentences

1953Such a protective clause is undoubtedly valid and enforceable if it does not contravene any policy of the law, that is, if it is not a matter of interest to the public or the State but merely an agreement be *310 tween persons relating entirely to their private affairs : Cannon v. Bresch, 307 Pa. 31 , 160 A. 595 ; Jacob Siegal Co. v. Philadelphia Record Co., 348 Pa. 245 , 35 A. 2d 408 ; Manius v. Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh, 350 Pa. 512 , 39 A. 2d 614 ; Wright v. Sterling Land Co., Inc., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 625 , 43 A. 2d 614 .

1953Such a protective clause is undoubtedly valid and enforceable if it does not contravene any policy of the law, that is, if it is not a matter of interest to the public or the State but merely an agreement be *310 tween persons relating entirely to their private affairs : Cannon v. Bresch, 307 Pa. 31 , 160 A. 595 ; Jacob Siegal Co. v. Philadelphia Record Co., 348 Pa. 245 , 35 A. 2d 408 ; Manius v. Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh, 350 Pa. 512 , 39 A. 2d 614 ; Wright v. Sterling Land Co., Inc., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 625 , 43 A. 2d 614 .

21953–1977
Jacob Siegel Co. v. Philadelphia Record Co. green
pa · 1943
2 sentences

1953Such a protective clause is undoubtedly valid and enforceable if it does not contravene any policy of the law, that is, if it is not a matter of interest to the public or the State but merely an agreement be *310 tween persons relating entirely to their private affairs : Cannon v. Bresch, 307 Pa. 31 , 160 A. 595 ; Jacob Siegal Co. v. Philadelphia Record Co., 348 Pa. 245 , 35 A. 2d 408 ; Manius v. Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh, 350 Pa. 512 , 39 A. 2d 614 ; Wright v. Sterling Land Co., Inc., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 625 , 43 A. 2d 614 .

1953Such a protective clause is undoubtedly valid and enforceable if it does not contravene any policy of the law, that is, if it is not a matter of interest to the public or the State but merely an agreement be *310 tween persons relating entirely to their private affairs : Cannon v. Bresch, 307 Pa. 31 , 160 A. 595 ; Jacob Siegal Co. v. Philadelphia Record Co., 348 Pa. 245 , 35 A. 2d 408 ; Manius v. Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh, 350 Pa. 512 , 39 A. 2d 614 ; Wright v. Sterling Land Co., Inc., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 625 , 43 A. 2d 614 .

21953–1977
Wright v. Sterling Lando Co., Inc. green
pasuperct · 1945
2 sentences

1953Such a protective clause is undoubtedly valid and enforceable if it does not contravene any policy of the law, that is, if it is not a matter of interest to the public or the State but merely an agreement be *310 tween persons relating entirely to their private affairs : Cannon v. Bresch, 307 Pa. 31 , 160 A. 595 ; Jacob Siegal Co. v. Philadelphia Record Co., 348 Pa. 245 , 35 A. 2d 408 ; Manius v. Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh, 350 Pa. 512 , 39 A. 2d 614 ; Wright v. Sterling Land Co., Inc., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 625 , 43 A. 2d 614 .

1953Such a protective clause is undoubtedly valid and enforceable if it does not contravene any policy of the law, that is, if it is not a matter of interest to the public or the State but merely an agreement be *310 tween persons relating entirely to their private affairs : Cannon v. Bresch, 307 Pa. 31 , 160 A. 595 ; Jacob Siegal Co. v. Philadelphia Record Co., 348 Pa. 245 , 35 A. 2d 408 ; Manius v. Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh, 350 Pa. 512 , 39 A. 2d 614 ; Wright v. Sterling Land Co., Inc., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 625 , 43 A. 2d 614 .

21953–1977
Richardson v. Marsh green
scotus · 1987
2 sentences

2002Richardson, 481 U.S. at 211 , 107 S.Ct. 1702 . [15] Most recently, in Gray v. Maryland, 523 U.S. 185 , 118 S.Ct. 1151 , 140 L.Ed.2d 294 (1998), the Court considered the scope of the protective rule first announced in Bruton by examining its decisions in both Bruton and Richardson.

2002Richardson, 481 U.S. at 211 , 107 S.Ct. 1702 . [15] Most recently, in Gray v. Maryland, 523 U.S. 185 , 118 S.Ct. 1151 , 140 L.Ed.2d 294 (1998), the Court considered the scope of the protective rule first announced in Bruton by examining its decisions in both Bruton and Richardson.

12002–2002
Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California red
cal · 1976
2 sentences

1998As succinctly stated by the court in Tarasojf, “The protective privilege ends where the public peril begins.” Tarasoff, 17 Cal.3d at 441 , 131 Cal.Rptr. at 27 , 551 P.2d at 347 .

1998As succinctly stated by the court in Tarasojf, “The protective privilege ends where the public peril begins.” Tarasoff, 17 Cal.3d at 441 , 131 Cal.Rptr. at 27 , 551 P.2d at 347 .

11998–1998
United States v. Ross green
scotus · 1982
2 sentences

1985The holding of Chambers v. Maroney, supra, cited with approval in Commonwealth v. Shaffer, supra, was recently reaffirmed and extended to permit the warrantless search of closed containers found within a vehicle, United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 , 102 S.Ct. 2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); But see Commonwealth v. Timko, supra; and, earlier, to permit the post-arrest warrantless seizure of the contents of a vehicle based upon plain view alone without regard to any exigent circumstances, Colorado v. Bannister, 449 U.S. 1 , 101 S.Ct. 42 , 66 L.Ed.2d 1 (1980). 6 Accordingly, the general rule of Ch

1985The holding of Chambers v. Maroney, supra, cited with approval in Commonwealth v. Shaffer, supra, was recently reaffirmed and extended to permit the warrantless search of closed containers found within a vehicle, United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 , 102 S.Ct. 2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); But see Commonwealth v. Timko, supra; and, earlier, to permit the post-arrest warrantless seizure of the contents of a vehicle based upon plain view alone without regard to any exigent circumstances, Colorado v. Bannister, 449 U.S. 1 , 101 S.Ct. 42 , 66 L.Ed.2d 1 (1980). 6 Accordingly, the general rule of Ch

11985–1985
Colorado v. Bannister green
scotus · 1980
2 sentences

1985The holding of Chambers v. Maroney, supra, cited with approval in Commonwealth v. Shaffer, supra, was recently reaffirmed and extended to permit the warrantless search of closed containers found within a vehicle, United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 , 102 S.Ct. 2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); But see Commonwealth v. Timko, supra; and, earlier, to permit the post-arrest warrantless seizure of the contents of a vehicle based upon plain view alone without regard to any exigent circumstances, Colorado v. Bannister, 449 U.S. 1 , 101 S.Ct. 42 , 66 L.Ed.2d 1 (1980). 6 Accordingly, the general rule of Ch

1985The holding of Chambers v. Maroney, supra, cited with approval in Commonwealth v. Shaffer, supra, was recently reaffirmed and extended to permit the warrantless search of closed containers found within a vehicle, United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 , 102 S.Ct. 2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); But see Commonwealth v. Timko, supra; and, earlier, to permit the post-arrest warrantless seizure of the contents of a vehicle based upon plain view alone without regard to any exigent circumstances, Colorado v. Bannister, 449 U.S. 1 , 101 S.Ct. 42 , 66 L.Ed.2d 1 (1980). 6 Accordingly, the general rule of Ch

11985–1985
Commonwealth v. Campana green
pa · 1974
2 sentences

1975Commonwealth v. Campana, 455 Pa. 622 , 314 A.2d 854 (1974) (addendum opinion). 4 See note 1, supra. 5 Pa. R.

1975Commonwealth v. Campana, 455 Pa. 622 , 314 A.2d 854 (1974) (addendum opinion). 4 See note 1, supra. 5 Pa. R.

11975–1975
State v. Kaluna green
haw · 1974
1 sentence

1975Commonwealth v. Campana, 455 Pa. 622 , 314 A.2d 854 (1974) (addendum opinion). 4 See note 1, supra. 5 Pa. R.

11975–1975
Bernard Rothman v. U-Steer-It, Inc. neutral
ca5 · 1957
1 sentence

1958Plaintiff submitted a supplemental brief in which he relies on the case of Rothman v. U-Steer-It, Inc., 247 F. 2d 803 .

11958–1958

Where else courts name it

CA 27 (1960–2025) NY 20 (1890–2020) WA 16 (1969–2023) NJ 16 (1957–2020) PA 11 (1953–2018) CO 10 (1959–2026) ME 9 (1971–2024) MD 8 (1970–2019) AZ 7 (1968–2026) AL 5 (1977–2010) CT 5 (2006–2025) MA 5 (2006–2018) TX 4 (1993–2015) OR 4 (1981–1998) GA 4 (1997–2022) MN 4 (1985–2005) MI 4 (1981–2008) OK 4 (1935–1999) DC 3 (1988–2011) WY 3 (1987–2018) WV 3 (1978–1980) TN 3 (1978–2016) KS 3 (1978–2019) IL 2 (1974–2021) UT 2 (2018–2018) OH 2 (1985–2019) SD 2 (2018–2018) DE 2 (1977–2019) ID 2 (1991–1997)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check