Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pindergreen2 sentences2019See State v. Pinder , 250 Conn. 385 , 417, 736 A.2d 857 (1999) (finding it unnecessary to reach defendant's claim that state constitution requires police to ask clarifying questions when its federal counterpart does not); State v. Anonymous , supra, 240 Conn. at 717 n.11, 694 A.2d 766 (declining to reach claim under state constitution because defendant did not provide independent analysis). 2019See State v. Pinder , 250 Conn. 385 , 417, 736 A.2d 857 (1999) (finding it unnecessary to reach defendant's claim that state constitution requires police to ask clarifying questions when its federal counterpart does not); State v. Anonymous , supra, 240 Conn. at 717 n.11, 694 A.2d 766 (declining to reach claim under state constitution because defendant did not provide independent analysis). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Bryantgreen2 sentences2008See State v. Bryant, 106 Conn. App. 97 , 105 n.5, 940 A.2d 858 , cert. granted on other grounds, 287 Conn. 905 , 950 A.2d 1282 (2008). 30 Even if we were inclined to accept the defendant’s invitation, he has offered no argument that the Connecticut constitution requires a more protective test than the Blockburger test. 2008See State v. Bryant, 106 Conn. App. 97 , 105 n.5, 940 A.2d 858 , cert. granted on other grounds, 287 Conn. 905 , 950 A.2d 1282 (2008). 30 Even if we were inclined to accept the defendant’s invitation, he has offered no argument that the Connecticut constitution requires a more protective test than the Blockburger test. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bryantgreen2 sentences2008See State v. Bryant, 106 Conn. App. 97 , 105 n.5, 940 A.2d 858 , cert. granted on other grounds, 287 Conn. 905 , 950 A.2d 1282 (2008). 30 Even if we were inclined to accept the defendant’s invitation, he has offered no argument that the Connecticut constitution requires a more protective test than the Blockburger test. 2008See State v. Bryant, 106 Conn. App. 97 , 105 n.5, 940 A.2d 858 , cert. granted on other grounds, 287 Conn. 905 , 950 A.2d 1282 (2008). 30 Even if we were inclined to accept the defendant’s invitation, he has offered no argument that the Connecticut constitution requires a more protective test than the Blockburger test. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Geisler
green
2 sentences2025In the present case, the defendant argues that Reid is not dispositive because ‘‘[t]he court did not do a full analysis of the independent constitutional claim but simply adopted the rationale of Harris in a conclusory footnote.’’ The majority acknowledges that the court in Reid ‘‘lacked the benefit of full briefing or analysis of the issue based on the now familiar factors articulated in Geisler, which was decided approximately eight years after Reid,’’ but nonetheless declines to engage in a more robust analysis of the exclusionary rule under our state constitution.9 Part I of the majority o 2025In the present case, the defendant argues that Reid is not dispositive because ‘‘[t]he court did not do a full analysis of the independent constitutional claim but simply adopted the rationale of Harris in a conclusory footnote.’’ The majority acknowledges that the court in Reid ‘‘lacked the benefit of full briefing or analysis of the issue based on the now familiar factors articulated in Geisler, which was decided approximately eight years after Reid,’’ but nonetheless declines to engage in a more robust analysis of the exclusionary rule under our state constitution.9 Part I of the majority o | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Anonymous
green
2 sentences2019See State v. Pinder , 250 Conn. 385 , 417, 736 A.2d 857 (1999) (finding it unnecessary to reach defendant's claim that state constitution requires police to ask clarifying questions when its federal counterpart does not); State v. Anonymous , supra, 240 Conn. at 717 n.11, 694 A.2d 766 (declining to reach claim under state constitution because defendant did not provide independent analysis). 2019See State v. Pinder , 250 Conn. 385 , 417, 736 A.2d 857 (1999) (finding it unnecessary to reach defendant's claim that state constitution requires police to ask clarifying questions when its federal counterpart does not); State v. Anonymous , supra, 240 Conn. at 717 n.11, 694 A.2d 766 (declining to reach claim under state constitution because defendant did not provide independent analysis). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Burns v. Board of Education
green
2 sentences2006Burns v. Board of Education, supra, 228 Conn. at 649 , 638 A.2d 1 . 2006Burns v. Board of Education, supra, 228 Conn. at 649 , 638 A.2d 1 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.