Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1962–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
BMC Software Belgium, NV v. Marchandgreen2 sentences2018See BMC Software, 83 S.W.3d at 795 . 2018See BMC Software , 83 S.W.3d at 795 . | 3 | 3 |
Texas Department of Transportation v. Sefzikgreen2 sentences2016See Tex. Dep’t of Transp. v. Sefzik, 355 S.W.3d 618, 622 (Tex. 2011) (“But Sefzik is not challenging the validity of a statute; instead, he is challenging TxDOT’s actions under it, and he does not direct us to any provision of the UDJA that expressly waives immunity for his claim.”). 2016See id. at 622 (“But Sefzik is not challenging the validity of a statute; instead, he is challenging the TxDOT’s actions under it, and he does not direct us to any 6 provision of the UDJA that expressly waives immunity for his claim.”). | 2 | 2 |
Wallace L. Hall, Jr., in His Official Capacity as a Regent for the University of Texas System v. William H. McRaven, in His Official Capacity as Chancellor for the University of Texas Systemgreen1 sentence2018See Hall v. McRaven, 508 S.W.3d 232, 242 (Tex. 2017) (“[A]n ultra vires doctrine that requires nothing more than an identifiable mistake would not be a narrow exception to immunity: it would swallow immunity.”); see also City of Carrollton v. Hamrla, No. 02-15-00119-CV, 2016 WL 93031 , at *5 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 7, 2016, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (“It is not enough for a litigant to challenge the actions of a governmental entity under a statute . . .; the validity of the statute . . . itself must be challenged for governmental immunity to be waived.”). | 1 | 1 |
Jordan v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Jordan v. State, 54 S.W.3d 783 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Carmell v. Texasgreen1 sentence2012Carmell v. Texas, 529 U.S. 513, 530 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. Hillgreen2 sentences1983Co. v. Hill, 281 U.S. 673, 678 [ 50 S.Ct. 451, 453 , 74 L.Ed. 1107 ]. 1983Co. v. Hill, 281 U.S. 673, 678 [ 50 S.Ct. 451, 453 , 74 L.Ed. 1107 ]. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. State
green
1 sentence1977Wood v. Wood, 159 Tex. 350 , 320 S.W.2d 807 (1959); Hammonds v. Hammonds, 158 Tex. 516 , 373 S.W.2d 603 (1958); Reaugh v. McCollum Exploration Co., supra; Hartzell Propeller Inc. v. Alexander, 517 S.W.2d 455 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1974, no writ); Smith v. State, supra. It is interesting to note, however, that prior to the amendment of Art. 2324 (Supp. 1977) the motion to retax the costs was available to a litigant to test the reasonableness of a court reporter’s fee in the Court of Civil Appeals. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Wood v. Wood
green
2 sentences1977Wood v. Wood, 159 Tex. 350 , 320 S.W.2d 807 (1959); Hammonds v. Hammonds, 158 Tex. 516 , 373 S.W.2d 603 (1958); Reaugh v. McCollum Exploration Co., supra; Hartzell Propeller Inc. v. Alexander, 517 S.W.2d 455 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1974, no writ); Smith v. State, supra. It is interesting to note, however, that prior to the amendment of Art. 2324 (Supp. 1977) the motion to retax the costs was available to a litigant to test the reasonableness of a court reporter’s fee in the Court of Civil Appeals. 1977Wood v. Wood, 159 Tex. 350 , 320 S.W.2d 807 (1959); Hammonds v. Hammonds, 158 Tex. 516 , 373 S.W.2d 603 (1958); Reaugh v. McCollum Exploration Co., supra; Hartzell Propeller Inc. v. Alexander, 517 S.W.2d 455 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1974, no writ); Smith v. State, supra. It is interesting to note, however, that prior to the amendment of Art. 2324 (Supp. 1977) the motion to retax the costs was available to a litigant to test the reasonableness of a court reporter’s fee in the Court of Civil Appeals. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Hartzell Propeller, Inc. v. Alexander
green
1 sentence1977Wood v. Wood, 159 Tex. 350 , 320 S.W.2d 807 (1959); Hammonds v. Hammonds, 158 Tex. 516 , 373 S.W.2d 603 (1958); Reaugh v. McCollum Exploration Co., supra; Hartzell Propeller Inc. v. Alexander, 517 S.W.2d 455 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1974, no writ); Smith v. State, supra. It is interesting to note, however, that prior to the amendment of Art. 2324 (Supp. 1977) the motion to retax the costs was available to a litigant to test the reasonableness of a court reporter’s fee in the Court of Civil Appeals. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Hammonds v. Hammonds
green
1 sentence1977Wood v. Wood, 159 Tex. 350 , 320 S.W.2d 807 (1959); Hammonds v. Hammonds, 158 Tex. 516 , 373 S.W.2d 603 (1958); Reaugh v. McCollum Exploration Co., supra; Hartzell Propeller Inc. v. Alexander, 517 S.W.2d 455 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1974, no writ); Smith v. State, supra. It is interesting to note, however, that prior to the amendment of Art. 2324 (Supp. 1977) the motion to retax the costs was available to a litigant to test the reasonableness of a court reporter’s fee in the Court of Civil Appeals. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Love v. State Bank & Trust Co.
green
2 sentences1962While the precise question was not that decided in the case, a similar conclusion of the Commission of Appeals was recited as dictum in Love v. State Bank & Trust *638 Co. of San Antonio, 1936, 126 Tex. 591 , 90 S.W.2d 819 . 1962While the precise question was not that decided in the case, a similar conclusion of the Commission of Appeals was recited as dictum in Love v. State Bank & Trust *638 Co. of San Antonio, 1936, 126 Tex. 591 , 90 S.W.2d 819 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.