11 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1953–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King County
green
2 sentences2000South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King County, 101 Wash.2d 68, 73 , 677 P.2d 114 (1984). 2000South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King County, 101 Wash.2d 68, 73 , 677 P.2d 114 (1984). | 3 | 1994–2000 |
Smoke v. City of Seattle
green
2 sentences2009The exhaustion of remedies doctrine applies “in cases where a claim is originally cognizable by an agency which has clearly defined mechanisms for resolving complaints by aggrieved parties and the administrative remedies can provide the relief sought.” Smoke v. City of Seattle, 132 Wn.2d 214, 224 , 937 P.2d 186 (1997). 2009The exhaustion of remedies doctrine applies "in cases where a claim is originally cognizable by an agency which has clearly defined mechanisms for resolving complaints by aggrieved parties and the administrative remedies can provide the relief sought." Smoke v. City of Seattle, 132 Wash.2d 214, 224 , 937 P.2d 186 (1997). | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Smoke v. City of Seattle
green
2 sentences2009The exhaustion of remedies doctrine applies “in cases where a claim is originally cognizable by an agency which has clearly defined mechanisms for resolving complaints by aggrieved parties and the administrative remedies can provide the relief sought.” Smoke v. City of Seattle, 132 Wn.2d 214, 224 , 937 P.2d 186 (1997). 2009The exhaustion of remedies doctrine applies "in cases where a claim is originally cognizable by an agency which has clearly defined mechanisms for resolving complaints by aggrieved parties and the administrative remedies can provide the relief sought." Smoke v. City of Seattle, 132 Wash.2d 214, 224 , 937 P.2d 186 (1997). | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 9 v. Spokane County Boundary Review Board
green
2 sentences2000Boundary Review Bd., 97 Wash.2d 922, 928 , 652 P.2d 1356 (1982).[ [16] ] And as the Court of Appeals has similarly observed: Under the exhaustion of remedies doctrine, an agency's action cannot be appealed in the courts until all rights of administrative appeal have been exhausted. 2000Boundary Review Bd., 97 Wash.2d 922, 928 , 652 P.2d 1356 (1982).[ [16] ] And as the Court of Appeals has similarly observed: Under the exhaustion of remedies doctrine, an agency's action cannot be appealed in the courts until all rights of administrative appeal have been exhausted. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
State Ex Rel. Shomaker v. Superior Court
neutral
2 sentences1973Shomaker v. Superior Court, 193 Wash. 465, 476 , 76 P. (2d) 306 ; . . . 1973Shomaker v. Superior Court, 193 Wash. 465, 476 , 76 P. (2d) 306 ; . . . | 2 | 1953–1973 |
IGI Resources, Inc. v. City of Pasco
neutral
1 sentence2015IGI Res., Inc. v. City of Pasco, 180 Wn. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State Ex Rel. Klappsa v. City of Enumclaw
neutral
2 sentences1985Klappsa v. Enumclaw, 73 Wn.2d 451 , 439 P.2d 246 (1968). 1985Klappsa v. Enumclaw, 73 Wn.2d 451 , 439 P.2d 246 (1968). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Ace Delivery Service, Inc. v. Boyd
green
2 sentences1984The Court of Appeals, following Ace Delivery Serv., Inc. v. Boyd, 100 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1958), created an exception to the exhaustion of remedies doctrine for those agency deci sions which are merely recommendations rather than final decisions. 1984The Court of Appeals, following Ace Delivery Serv., Inc. v. Boyd, 100 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1958), created an exception to the exhaustion of remedies doctrine for those agency decisions *76 which are merely recommendations rather than final decisions. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Wright v. Woodard
green
2 sentences1976Wright v. Woodard, 83 Wn.2d 378, 381 , 518 P.2d 718 (1974). 1976Wright v. Woodard, 83 Wn.2d 378, 381 , 518 P.2d 718 (1974). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
McAvoy v. Ernst
neutral
2 sentences1953Shomaker v. Superior Court, 193 Wash. 465, 476 , 76 P. (2d) 306 ; McAvoy v. Ernst, 196 Wash. 416 , 83 P. (2d) 245 ; and Bowen v. Department of Social Security, 14 Wn. (2d) 148, 127 P. (2d) 682 . 1953Shomaker v. Superior Court, 193 Wash. 465, 476 , 76 P. (2d) 306 ; McAvoy v. Ernst, 196 Wash. 416 , 83 P. (2d) 245 ; and Bowen v. Department of Social Security, 14 Wn. (2d) 148, 127 P. (2d) 682 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Bowen v. Department of Social Security
green
1 sentence1953Shomaker v. Superior Court, 193 Wash. 465, 476 , 76 P. (2d) 306 ; McAvoy v. Ernst, 196 Wash. 416 , 83 P. (2d) 245 ; and Bowen v. Department of Social Security, 14 Wn. (2d) 148, 127 P. (2d) 682 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.