exhaustion of remedies doctrine in Connecticut

2001Maresca v. Ridgefield, 35 Conn. App. 769, 773 , 647 A.2d 751 (1994).

2001Maresca v. Ridgefield, 35 Conn. App. 769, 773 , 647 A.2d 751 (1994).

1998The plaintiff, however, claims that she "falls squarely within the exception to the exhaustion of remedies rule . . ." (Plaintiff's Memorandum, 12/11/97, p. 4.) Citing Scoville v. CT Page 5907 Ronalter, 162 Conn. 67 , 70 , 74 , 291 A.2d 222 (1973), and Cummings v. Tripp, 204 Conn. 67 , 75 , 527 A.2d 230 (1987), the plaintiff relies on the exception which states that "[a]ny person specifically and materially damaged by a violation of the zoning ordinances which has occurred or is likely to occur on another's land may seek injunctive relief restraining such violation [without exhausting administ

1998The plaintiff, however, claims that she "falls squarely within the exception to the exhaustion of remedies rule . . ." (Plaintiff's Memorandum, 12/11/97, p. 4.) Citing Scoville v. CT Page 5907 Ronalter, 162 Conn. 67 , 70 , 74 , 291 A.2d 222 (1973), and Cummings v. Tripp, 204 Conn. 67 , 75 , 527 A.2d 230 (1987), the plaintiff relies on the exception which states that "[a]ny person specifically and materially damaged by a violation of the zoning ordinances which has occurred or is likely to occur on another's land may seek injunctive relief restraining such violation [without exhausting administ

2008In both contexts, if a party has failed to avail itself of the arbitration or appeal process, the trial court is without subject matter jurisdiction to hear its claims.” (Citation omitted.) Neiman v. Yale University, 270 Conn. 244, 253 , 851 A.2d 1165 (2004).

2008In both contexts, if a party has failed to avail itself of the arbitration or appeal process, the trial court is without subject matter jurisdiction to hear its claims.” (Citation omitted.) Neiman v. Yale University, 270 Conn. 244, 253 , 851 A.2d 1165 (2004).

2004The exhaustion of remedies doctrine is applied in a number of different situations; Stepney, LLC v. Fairfield, 263 Conn. 558, 565 , 821 A.2d 725 (2003); including when an exclusive grievance or arbitration procedure is contained in a collective bargaining agreement and when an administrative appeal is taken.

2004The exhaustion of remedies doctrine is applied in a number of different situations; Stepney, LLC v. Fairfield, 263 Conn. 558, 565 , 821 A.2d 725 (2003); including when an exclusive grievance or arbitration procedure is contained in a collective bargaining agreement and when an administrative appeal is taken.

2002The exhaustion of remedies doctrine provides that "no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Hartford v. Hartford Municpal Employees Assn ., 259 Conn. 251 , 281 , 788 A.2d 60 (2002).

2002The exhaustion of remedies doctrine provides that "no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Hartford v. Hartford Municpal Employees Assn ., 259 Conn. 251 , 281 , 788 A.2d 60 (2002).

2002As has been stated aptly, "The law does not require the doing of a useless thing." Corsino v. Grover , 148 Conn. 299 , 308 , 170 A,2d 267 (1961).

2002As has been stated aptly, "The law does not require the doing of a useless thing." Corsino v. Grover , 148 Conn. 299 , 308 , 170 A,2d 267 (1961).

2001Maresca v. Ridgefield, 35 Conn. App. 769, 773 , 647 A.2d 751 (1994).” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) O’Halloran v. Charlotte Hungerford Hospital, 63 Conn. App. 460, 464-65 , 776 A.2d 514 (2001).

2001Maresca v. Ridgefield, 35 Conn. App. 769, 773 , 647 A.2d 751 (1994).” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) O’Halloran v. Charlotte Hungerford Hospital, 63 Conn. App. 460, 464-65 , 776 A.2d 514 (2001).

1998The plaintiff, however, claims that she "falls squarely within the exception to the exhaustion of remedies rule . . ." (Plaintiff's Memorandum, 12/11/97, p. 4.) Citing Scoville v. CT Page 5907 Ronalter, 162 Conn. 67 , 70 , 74 , 291 A.2d 222 (1973), and Cummings v. Tripp, 204 Conn. 67 , 75 , 527 A.2d 230 (1987), the plaintiff relies on the exception which states that "[a]ny person specifically and materially damaged by a violation of the zoning ordinances which has occurred or is likely to occur on another's land may seek injunctive relief restraining such violation [without exhausting administ

1998The plaintiff, however, claims that she "falls squarely within the exception to the exhaustion of remedies rule . . ." (Plaintiff's Memorandum, 12/11/97, p. 4.) Citing Scoville v. CT Page 5907 Ronalter, 162 Conn. 67 , 70 , 74 , 291 A.2d 222 (1973), and Cummings v. Tripp, 204 Conn. 67 , 75 , 527 A.2d 230 (1987), the plaintiff relies on the exception which states that "[a]ny person specifically and materially damaged by a violation of the zoning ordinances which has occurred or is likely to occur on another's land may seek injunctive relief restraining such violation [without exhausting administ

1996“Although resting on the doctrine of exhaustion of remedies, our decision in Norwich recognized that the legislative purpose behind the limitation periods for challenging tax assessments would be thwarted if an action for refund of taxes paid upon a disputed assessment could be brought far beyond the time limits for contesting an assessment established by these statutes.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Wilson v. Kelley, 224 Conn. 110, 122-23 , 617 A.2d 433 (1992).

1996“Although resting on the doctrine of exhaustion of remedies, our decision in Norwich recognized that the legislative purpose behind the limitation periods for challenging tax assessments would be thwarted if an action for refund of taxes paid upon a disputed assessment could be brought far beyond the time limits for contesting an assessment established by these statutes.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Wilson v. Kelley, 224 Conn. 110, 122-23 , 617 A.2d 433 (1992).

1994"The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies contemplates a situation where some administrative action has begun . . . ." Sharkey v. Stamford, 196 Conn. 253 , 255-56 , 492 A.2d 155 (1985).

1994"The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies contemplates a situation where some administrative action has begun . . . ." Sharkey v. Stamford, 196 Conn. 253 , 255-56 , 492 A.2d 155 (1985).

1994Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Sterling, 204 Conn. 551 , 556 , 529 A.2d 66 (1987); see 2 K.

1994Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Sterling, 204 Conn. 551 , 556 , 529 A.2d 66 (1987); see 2 K.

1990Id., 365; see also Pet v. Department of Health Services, 207 Conn. 346, 351 , 542 A.2d 672 (1988); Cahill v. Board of Education, 198 Conn. 229, 238 , 502 A.2d 410 (1985).

1990Id., 365; see also Pet v. Department of Health Services, 207 Conn. 346, 351 , 542 A.2d 672 (1988); Cahill v. Board of Education, 198 Conn. 229, 238 , 502 A.2d 410 (1985).